Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad Daisy has a new home.

Wow, assh0le. I bet Daisy would rather be with her owner.

Most of you posting on this thread are disgusting human beings.

Why don't you help instead of splitting hairs over details that don't matter https://www.gofundme.com/f/harold-riley

But details do matter.

Pets should not be allowed on metro.

Daisy is a pet. There no proof Daisy was an ADA-approved service animal.

But for the victim’s act of bringing his pet into metro, the victim would still be alive today.

Arguing the facts does not make one an “a-hole” as you claimed.

There is no such thing. Neither the ADA nor any similar agency "approves" service animals. Yes, there are definitions and guidelines about what a service dog should be and do, but there is no certifying or enforcing agency. So much for your facts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrifying and I hope it gets deleted before his family sees it.

I bet some of y'all fixated on the status of his dog's qualifications instead of his death and the trauma experienced by the witnesses claim to be pro-life.

God people in this area are freaking bizarre and soulless. Take up your dog rules agenda with your state and local governments. Advocate for real service animal policies.

It's why Jeff has to have a 48 hour rule. Although I see it doesn't apply to death by Metro.

This is not death by Metro. This is death by personal carelessness.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad Daisy has a new home.

Wow, assh0le. I bet Daisy would rather be with her owner.

Most of you posting on this thread are disgusting human beings.

Why don't you help instead of splitting hairs over details that don't matter https://www.gofundme.com/f/harold-riley

What is the GoFundMe (that the daughter set up?!?!) even for?

Cash grab.

I think it's weird that she set it up the day he died. (She says "We tragically lost my father today in a train accident.") Seems oddly rushed.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrifying and I hope it gets deleted before his family sees it.

I bet some of y'all fixated on the status of his dog's qualifications instead of his death and the trauma experienced by the witnesses claim to be pro-life.

God people in this area are freaking bizarre and soulless. Take up your dog rules agenda with your state and local governments. Advocate for real service animal policies.

Think of it this way. People get dogs for protection, right? Especially pitbulls, for protection. Well, your protection is a threat to everyone else. For people with dog phobias or who have been attacked as children, it's visceral. So if you're going to have a dog in public with other people, especially in a confined train car, it better be trained and qualified. Because many people see an unleashed dog as an unpredictable threat.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is horrifying and I hope it gets deleted before his family sees it.

I bet some of y'all fixated on the status of his dog's qualifications instead of his death and the trauma experienced by the witnesses claim to be pro-life.

God people in this area are freaking bizarre and soulless. Take up your dog rules agenda with your state and local governments. Advocate for real service animal policies.

It's why Jeff has to have a 48 hour rule. Although I see it doesn't apply to death by Metro.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy is dead for chrissakes. You people are petty and cold.

+1

This thread is depressing insight to our culture.

Dog people are often inconsiderate of others and regularly break rules that they consider to be ridiculous. Many people have real phobias and the danger is sometimes real. This thread illustrates the disconnect between dog people and those who have "had a bad experience".

This.

People are fed up with a culture of putting dogs above people. It's wonderful to love your dog, and treat it like a king or queen at home. But in public, human beings come first. And the inability of some dog owners to acknowledge this says a loit about their ill character. Not to mention the harm it does to people who actually NEED to have service animals and dogs with them for legitimate, real medical needs.

I can’t stand the dog-as-child culture but I’m still not going to be an a-hole about this man’s death. Some of you are contributing to our crappy culture too- just in another way: you don’t care about people, obviously.

+1

This thread is horrifying and I hope it gets deleted before his family sees it.

I bet some of y'all fixated on the status of his dog's qualifications instead of his death and the trauma experienced by the witnesses claim to be pro-life.

God people in this area are freaking bizarre and soulless. Take up your dog rules agenda with your state and local governments. Advocate for real service animal policies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so glad Daisy has a new home.

Wow, assh0le. I bet Daisy would rather be with her owner.

Most of you posting on this thread are disgusting human beings.

Why don't you help instead of splitting hairs over details that don't matter https://www.gofundme.com/f/harold-riley

But details do matter.

Pets should not be allowed on metro.

Daisy is a pet. There no proof Daisy was an ADA-approved service animal.

But for the victim’s act of bringing his pet into metro, the victim would still be alive today.

Arguing the facts does not make one an “a-hole” as you claimed.

You're clearly a moron. You are arguing about something I didn't say. I called that poster an a hole because their response to this story was to be gleeful about this dog going to a new home (read: not with her owner whom everyone apparently thinks he deserves what happened because he broke a rule, allegedly.)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy is dead for chrissakes. You people are petty and cold.

+1

This thread is depressing insight to our culture.

Dog people are often inconsiderate of others and regularly break rules that they consider to be ridiculous. Many people have real phobias and the danger is sometimes real. This thread illustrates the disconnect between dog people and those who have "had a bad experience".

This.

People are fed up with a culture of putting dogs above people. It's wonderful to love your dog, and treat it like a king or queen at home. But in public, human beings come first. And the inability of some dog owners to acknowledge this says a loit about their ill character. Not to mention the harm it does to people who actually NEED to have service animals and dogs with them for legitimate, real medical needs.

I can’t stand the dog-as-child culture but I’m still not going to be an a-hole about this man’s death. Some of you are contributing to our crappy culture too- just in another way: you don’t care about people, obviously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy is dead for chrissakes. You people are petty and cold.

+1

This thread is depressing insight to our culture.

Dog people are often inconsiderate of others and regularly break rules that they consider to be ridiculous. Many people have real phobias and the danger is sometimes real. This thread illustrates the disconnect between dog people and those who have "had a bad experience".

No. I’m not a dog person. I’m a little afraid of them really. But I’m not going to be callous and judgmental about this man’s death. It appears his family loved him and it’s tragic a violent death and tragic loss for his family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guy is dead for chrissakes. You people are petty and cold.

+1

This thread is depressing insight to our culture.

Dog people are often inconsiderate of others and regularly break rules that they consider to be ridiculous. Many people have real phobias and the danger is sometimes real. This thread illustrates the disconnect between dog people and those who have "had a bad experience".

This.

People are fed up with a culture of putting dogs above people. It's wonderful to love your dog, and treat it like a king or queen at home. But in public, human beings come first. And the inability of some dog owners to acknowledge this says a loit about their ill character. Not to mention the harm it does to people who actually NEED to have service animals and dogs with them for legitimate, real medical needs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was a pitbull.

https://twitter.com/adamtuss/status/1626224469936340996?s=46&t=6wJqFUd4gJdaUhQQR0tr1Q

Wow so his irresponsibility went even deeper than first suspected, and he didn't even have control of the animal.

Daisy is super cute!!! I wish he could be my service dog.

Anonymous wrote:
Service dogs are incredibly well-trained and compliant. This dog was not.

Were you THERE???