Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman is standing her ground!
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClO9YM8vxau/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Wow, that’s disappointing.
I always assumed her kids didn’t want much to do with her because they were alienated by Tom Cruise, but now I wonder.
It’s a little weird that she posted that Balenciaga photo to her Instagram in the middle of all of this and that she’s kept it up. Perhaps it’s a contractual thing?
All about $$
Yes, but she could be hurting her image.
Her contract/attorneys aren't as good as KK's in this respect, but then influence is KK's primary function, so this shouldn't be surprising. Regardless this will blow over. If Kidman completes her contractual obligations, and doesn't otherwise engage, it won't stick to her.
Are you saying in the meantime you think Nicole is cringing and isn'r intentionally showing support but instead is obligated to post?
Yes, she's obligated to post, the timeline was probably fully spelled out. No doubt Balenciaga's contract had an out if NK did anything embarrassing, but seems she doesn't have similar protections. Why wouldn't she be cringing? surely she was completely blindsided. She's not in the controversial images, how could she have known or prevented this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Balenciaga has updated your apology and outlined their course of action. Is it enough?
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClrHlMzqjt9/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
For me? No. Their stuff just makes me feel gross now. I feel like it’s tainted permanently for me.
This. If you want to know how someone really feels, it isn't the apology drafted by a crisis management PR firm
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Balenciaga has updated your apology and outlined their course of action. Is it enough?
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClrHlMzqjt9/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
For me? No. Their stuff just makes me feel gross now. I feel like it’s tainted permanently for me.
Anonymous wrote:Balenciaga has updated your apology and outlined their course of action. Is it enough?
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClrHlMzqjt9/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman is standing her ground!
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClO9YM8vxau/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Wow, that’s disappointing.
I always assumed her kids didn’t want much to do with her because they were alienated by Tom Cruise, but now I wonder.
It’s a little weird that she posted that Balenciaga photo to her Instagram in the middle of all of this and that she’s kept it up. Perhaps it’s a contractual thing?
All about $$
Yes, but she could be hurting her image.
Her contract/attorneys aren't as good as KK's in this respect, but then influence is KK's primary function, so this shouldn't be surprising. Regardless this will blow over. If Kidman completes her contractual obligations, and doesn't otherwise engage, it won't stick to her.
Are you saying in the meantime you think Nicole is cringing and isn'r intentionally showing support but instead is obligated to post?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman is standing her ground!
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClO9YM8vxau/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Wow, that’s disappointing.
I always assumed her kids didn’t want much to do with her because they were alienated by Tom Cruise, but now I wonder.
It’s a little weird that she posted that Balenciaga photo to her Instagram in the middle of all of this and that she’s kept it up. Perhaps it’s a contractual thing?
All about $$
Yes, but she could be hurting her image.
Her contract/attorneys aren't as good as KK's in this respect, but then influence is KK's primary function, so this shouldn't be surprising. Regardless this will blow over. If Kidman completes her contractual obligations, and doesn't otherwise engage, it won't stick to her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Balenciaga has updated your apology and outlined their course of action. Is it enough?
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClrHlMzqjt9/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Ha! Knew that lawsuit was just for show and would be dropped.
They need a better English translator.
Anonymous wrote:Balenciaga has updated your apology and outlined their course of action. Is it enough?
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClrHlMzqjt9/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman is standing her ground!
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClO9YM8vxau/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Wow, that’s disappointing.
I always assumed her kids didn’t want much to do with her because they were alienated by Tom Cruise, but now I wonder.
It’s a little weird that she posted that Balenciaga photo to her Instagram in the middle of all of this and that she’s kept it up. Perhaps it’s a contractual thing?
All about $$
Yes, but she could be hurting her image.
Her contract/attorneys aren't as good as KK's in this respect, but then influence is KK's primary function, so this shouldn't be surprising. Regardless this will blow over. If Kidman completes her contractual obligations, and doesn't otherwise engage, it won't stick to her.
Anonymous wrote:This is not a good look:
https://www.instagram.com/p/Cfp3fXRLo2N/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nicole Kidman is standing her ground!
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClO9YM8vxau/?igshid=NTdlMDg3MTY=
Wow, that’s disappointing.
I always assumed her kids didn’t want much to do with her because they were alienated by Tom Cruise, but now I wonder.
It’s a little weird that she posted that Balenciaga photo to her Instagram in the middle of all of this and that she’s kept it up. Perhaps it’s a contractual thing?
All about $$
Yes, but she could be hurting her image.