Anonymous wrote:If Ukraine can take back some or all of their land, more power to them.
Just make it quick…
I think frozen conflict is more likely though
The general singled out the role of Turkish-made Bayraktar drones. “Enemy infantry and motorised artillery units unprotected by air defence systems become easy prey for our Bayraktars, the quantity of which is always increasing, thanks to our volunteers,” he said.
A top US general, Mark Milley, described the progress of Ukraine’s counteroffensive as “steady” and “deliberate”, and pointed in particular to the impact of US-supplied high-mobility artillery rocket systems (Himars) in supporting Ukraine’s advance.
“We are seeing real and measurable gains from Ukraine in the use of these systems,” Gen Milley, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, said in Ramstein, Germany. “For example, Ukrainians have struck over 400 targets with the Himars and they’ve had a devastating effect.
“Russian lines of communication and supply channels are severely strained. It is having a direct impact on the Russian ability to project and sustain combat power. Russian command and control in their headquarters have been disrupted and they’re having great difficulty in supplying their forces and replacing their combat losses.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, its more like, why should Ukraine cede Crimea? Ukraine has a borders. It is a country. Russia needs to get out.
It's not that hard.
Crimea is never coming back. Ukraine knows it and the world knows it so there's no point focusing on the unrealistic goals.
I mean is Israel getting out of the West Bank? Nope. A full ocean of Palestinian tears won't change that.
Never say never—history is long. But I suspect Ukraine would settle for something without the peninsula but can’t give up the southern shore. And Russia feels like it needs that southern shore to lock down the Black Sea which has always been its military obsession since C the Great at least. I’ve looked at the map a lot and I just don’t see how anyone can let Russia have that lane bridge they want. It cuts off Ukraine too sharply and leaves Odessa hanging. It’s literally a bridge too far.
I've said that before like a hundred times...that's exactly what Istanbul talks offered. Retreat to Feb 24 lines, and tabling Crimea/Donetsk for 15 years. They could have had their south back.
Someone in State wanted this war badly, and for it to go on.
A "cheap" way to contain Russia, I guess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, its more like, why should Ukraine cede Crimea? Ukraine has a borders. It is a country. Russia needs to get out.
It's not that hard.
Crimea is never coming back. Ukraine knows it and the world knows it so there's no point focusing on the unrealistic goals.
I mean is Israel getting out of the West Bank? Nope. A full ocean of Palestinian tears won't change that.
Never say never—history is long. But I suspect Ukraine would settle for something without the peninsula but can’t give up the southern shore. And Russia feels like it needs that southern shore to lock down the Black Sea which has always been its military obsession since C the Great at least. I’ve looked at the map a lot and I just don’t see how anyone can let Russia have that lane bridge they want. It cuts off Ukraine too sharply and leaves Odessa hanging. It’s literally a bridge too far.
I've said that before like a hundred times...that's exactly what Istanbul talks offered. Retreat to Feb 24 lines, and tabling Crimea/Donetsk for 15 years. They could have had their south back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No, its more like, why should Ukraine cede Crimea? Ukraine has a borders. It is a country. Russia needs to get out.
It's not that hard.
Crimea is never coming back. Ukraine knows it and the world knows it so there's no point focusing on the unrealistic goals.
I mean is Israel getting out of the West Bank? Nope. A full ocean of Palestinian tears won't change that.
Never say never—history is long. But I suspect Ukraine would settle for something without the peninsula but can’t give up the southern shore. And Russia feels like it needs that southern shore to lock down the Black Sea which has always been its military obsession since C the Great at least. I’ve looked at the map a lot and I just don’t see how anyone can let Russia have that lane bridge they want. It cuts off Ukraine too sharply and leaves Odessa hanging. It’s literally a bridge too far.
I've said that before like a hundred times...that's exactly what Istanbul talks offered. Retreat to Feb 24 lines, and tabling Crimea/Donetsk for 15 years. They could have had their south back.
Anonymous wrote:The Ukrainians have had a significant military breakthrough today. Russians are fleeing in certain parts of the country. Perhaps the rout to the Dnieper is on!