Anonymous
07/05/2022 13:03
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Depp nutters are the Trump nutters.
No, actually they are the same people whose Trump memes you enjoyed for years.
All the people that I know who followed the trial and sided with Johnny are democrats.
Pp you’re replying to. The Trump memes were great! So were the Biden memes (miss them). I haven’t done a survey of the people I know. I suspect they didn’t get caught up in it. If they did, they’re probably with the crowd that thinks they’re both crazy. I watched the entire trial without social media (binged every night to stay current). I do think Chewy and his team’s behavior, language, word salad, gotcha attempts resembled nutters. When I did occasionally check social media, it was clear. The language, over the top alpaca crazies, courtroom watchers were def Trumpers. As far as the women nutters, a pp was spot on with the penis envy analysis. Very MTG vibe.
I don't know what you're talking about, it wasn't clear from my social media that those were Trump supporters, quite the opposite.
If "penis envy" existed it would suit only one person here: Amber Heard (there's an audio of her telling Johnny over and over again to suck her, I'm assuming, non-existent penis).
I watched every minute of that trial and work in a creative field. Aside from people who thought they are both crazy, there wasn't a single person who sided with AH.
NP. Although I'm fairly liberal, I'm from Indiana and know a lot of Trumpers. One thing we've all agreed on is that Amber Turd is an abuser and Johnny was her victim. I don't know a single person, left or right, that thinks the jury got it wrong. When there's unanimity from the left and right, it's got to be the correct choice.
I think they got it wrong. They should have thrown out both claims. They were both abusers.
Liberal. Jury got it right. AH was a liar. You don’t write an OpEd like that when you are also an abuser.
Anonymous
07/05/2022 07:28
Subject: Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Remember that the title of Heards op-ed in question said
“ I spoke up against sexual violence”
It wasn’t sufficient for her lawyers to claim that depp engaged in domestic abuse in general: hitting, shouting, gaslighting etc. They had to prove that he engaged in sexual violence specifically to claim that his defamation suit is without grounds.
“ I spoke up against sexual violence”
It wasn’t sufficient for her lawyers to claim that depp engaged in domestic abuse in general: hitting, shouting, gaslighting etc. They had to prove that he engaged in sexual violence specifically to claim that his defamation suit is without grounds.
Anonymous
07/05/2022 06:36
Subject: Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Plenty of women support Johnny Depp. This isn’t about the rule of law. Plenty of women watched the trial and decided for themselves that Amber Heard and her testimony and evidence did not appear credible. I don’t think I believe Johnny is a flawless human, but I do think she lied enough to cause the jury to turn against her. In any event, Amber won one charge herself, so it’s clear the jury didn’t just “go against women” not to mention there were two female jurors and the decision was unanimous.
Anonymous
07/05/2022 02:57
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Because Amber is a woman, duh. Misogyny is the Rule of Law.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:42
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:They just confirmed this is fake news.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/johnny-depp-rep-addresses-claim-165101494.html
Oops wrong thread. My bad.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 19:41
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
They just confirmed this is fake news.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/johnny-depp-rep-addresses-claim-165101494.html
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/johnny-depp-rep-addresses-claim-165101494.html
Anonymous
06/29/2022 15:35
Subject: Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD should post here and find his next narcissist's supply. Seems many women are willing and will be happy to be smacked and beaten by him.
There's a sucker born every day.
https://nypost.com/2022/05/23/johnny-depp-talks-to-fans-outside-of-court-in-jack-sparrow-voice/
He will be like Robert Blake, soon, marrying a nobody gold digger instead of a famous, beautiful gold digger. We know how that ended for the gold digger. (Actually for both gold diggers.)
Wonder if the fan girls in video know that Depp calls them barnacles or parasites or both, I can’t remember. And thats a VA crowd. None have jobs or attend school? His legal team is from MA, the state that could be VA if it weren’t for college students. The line between Rep and Dem is very thin. He would have lost in CA.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 15:24
Subject: Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t believe Johnny either. Two druggie abusers. Yuck.
That's what one juror said, basically spot on.
My take as well. Neither would have gotten a penny from me so they are lucky I wasn't called.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 14:59
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Depp nutters are the Trump nutters.
No, actually they are the same people whose Trump memes you enjoyed for years.
All the people that I know who followed the trial and sided with Johnny are democrats.
Pp you’re replying to. The Trump memes were great! So were the Biden memes (miss them). I haven’t done a survey of the people I know. I suspect they didn’t get caught up in it. If they did, they’re probably with the crowd that thinks they’re both crazy. I watched the entire trial without social media (binged every night to stay current). I do think Chewy and his team’s behavior, language, word salad, gotcha attempts resembled nutters. When I did occasionally check social media, it was clear. The language, over the top alpaca crazies, courtroom watchers were def Trumpers. As far as the women nutters, a pp was spot on with the penis envy analysis. Very MTG vibe.
I don't know what you're talking about, it wasn't clear from my social media that those were Trump supporters, quite the opposite.
If "penis envy" existed it would suit only one person here: Amber Heard (there's an audio of her telling Johnny over and over again to suck her, I'm assuming, non-existent penis).
I watched every minute of that trial and work in a creative field. Aside from people who thought they are both crazy, there wasn't a single person who sided with AH.
NP. Although I'm fairly liberal, I'm from Indiana and know a lot of Trumpers. One thing we've all agreed on is that Amber Turd is an abuser and Johnny was her victim. I don't know a single person, left or right, that thinks the jury got it wrong. When there's unanimity from the left and right, it's got to be the correct choice.
You calling woman names like that tells us all we need to know. You are an enforcer of patriarchy and think supporting an abusive POS is awesome! You do not even know what liberal means.
Liberal doesn't mean what you think it means.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 13:39
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Depp nutters are the Trump nutters.
No, actually they are the same people whose Trump memes you enjoyed for years.
All the people that I know who followed the trial and sided with Johnny are democrats.
Pp you’re replying to. The Trump memes were great! So were the Biden memes (miss them). I haven’t done a survey of the people I know. I suspect they didn’t get caught up in it. If they did, they’re probably with the crowd that thinks they’re both crazy. I watched the entire trial without social media (binged every night to stay current). I do think Chewy and his team’s behavior, language, word salad, gotcha attempts resembled nutters. When I did occasionally check social media, it was clear. The language, over the top alpaca crazies, courtroom watchers were def Trumpers. As far as the women nutters, a pp was spot on with the penis envy analysis. Very MTG vibe.
I don't know what you're talking about, it wasn't clear from my social media that those were Trump supporters, quite the opposite.
If "penis envy" existed it would suit only one person here: Amber Heard (there's an audio of her telling Johnny over and over again to suck her, I'm assuming, non-existent penis).
I watched every minute of that trial and work in a creative field. Aside from people who thought they are both crazy, there wasn't a single person who sided with AH.
NP. Although I'm fairly liberal, I'm from Indiana and know a lot of Trumpers. One thing we've all agreed on is that Amber Turd is an abuser and Johnny was her victim. I don't know a single person, left or right, that thinks the jury got it wrong. When there's unanimity from the left and right, it's got to be the correct choice.
You calling woman names like that tells us all we need to know. You are an enforcer of patriarchy and think supporting an abusive POS is awesome! You do not even know what liberal means.
np here. Isn't it narrowminded to say only men can be called names? POS is fine, Turd is a big problem? She is the abuser and instigator. Some women are abusive and deserve their day in court, nothing to do with patriarchy.
Anonymous
06/29/2022 12:48
Subject: Re:Jurors explain why they sided with Johnny Depp
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Depp nutters are the Trump nutters.
No, actually they are the same people whose Trump memes you enjoyed for years.
All the people that I know who followed the trial and sided with Johnny are democrats.
Pp you’re replying to. The Trump memes were great! So were the Biden memes (miss them). I haven’t done a survey of the people I know. I suspect they didn’t get caught up in it. If they did, they’re probably with the crowd that thinks they’re both crazy. I watched the entire trial without social media (binged every night to stay current). I do think Chewy and his team’s behavior, language, word salad, gotcha attempts resembled nutters. When I did occasionally check social media, it was clear. The language, over the top alpaca crazies, courtroom watchers were def Trumpers. As far as the women nutters, a pp was spot on with the penis envy analysis. Very MTG vibe.
I don't know what you're talking about, it wasn't clear from my social media that those were Trump supporters, quite the opposite.
If "penis envy" existed it would suit only one person here: Amber Heard (there's an audio of her telling Johnny over and over again to suck her, I'm assuming, non-existent penis).
I watched every minute of that trial and work in a creative field. Aside from people who thought they are both crazy, there wasn't a single person who sided with AH.
NP. Although I'm fairly liberal, I'm from Indiana and know a lot of Trumpers. One thing we've all agreed on is that Amber Turd is an abuser and Johnny was her victim. I don't know a single person, left or right, that thinks the jury got it wrong. When there's unanimity from the left and right, it's got to be the correct choice.
You calling woman names like that tells us all we need to know. You are an enforcer of patriarchy and think supporting an abusive POS is awesome! You do not even know what liberal means.