Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m having a wedding this fall and inviting a handful of nieces and nephews, but none age 5 and under, and none who are young adults I’ve not seen for over 5 years. It’s not my responsibility to host a family reunion.
THISSSSSS
Anonymous wrote:I hate weddings and I no longer go out of my way to attend them. I'd be annoyed too but I have learned my lesson. Next time don't overexert yourself and skip it if it's a hassle.
Anonymous wrote:Being “pet peeved” is not a thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If I could do it over again (my wedding was 10 years ago), I would have explicitly invited kids. I remember going to family weddings as a kid and thinking the bride was a princess and that eating cake and dancing and staying up a little late was the most magical thing in the world. We had one kid crash our wedding and some of my favorite photos are with her on the dance floor. I think brides get so caught up in trying to be classy or formal and it’s not what you remember many years later.
Or they just really like kids and don't want bands of them flying through what is one of the biggest and potentially most expensive days of their life. I had a no kids wedding and no regrets, I don't like being around tons of kids. I love my two, but for a night out? Forget it. Don't need my kids with me or to be around other people's.
When I got married we were 25 and none of our friends had kids yet so, though we welcomed kids, there weren’t many there; maybe 10 tops. It was a lot of fun and it worked out well. I love kids but if I got married now and invited everyone’s kids there would be like 75 kids there! I’m not saying it couldn’t work but I definitely don’t fault brides and grooms who limit kids to family as not doing so could be pretty hectic and would add considerably to the overall cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This thread is ridiculous. Your kids aren’t entitled to an invite.
If only you could read....nobody is saying kids are entitled to be invited. The OP was saying that she was rightfully annoyed that the bride/groom lied to her about this issue.
NP. Show me exactly where OP said she was literally told by the bride and groom this was 100% a child free wedding, guaranteed. Oh wait, you can’t because not even OP said that happened. Seems like OP simply ASSumed that not her kids = guaranteed no kids.
Well, her title said "No Kids Wedding," suggesting that she was under the impression that it was a wedding without kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We went way out of our way to go to a wedding, brought the kids because there is no where to leave them, found a babysitter in the wedding town and arrive to see tons of kids at the wedding. They were all "in the wedding party" but still I was really pet peeved to see that they basically allowed the entire grooms family to bring their kids and no one else.
Is that normal? I thought no kids meant 0 kids not even in the wedding party.
Why is this in quotes? They were in the wedding party. Fact. They were therefore probably important to the bride and groom. This isn't rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think this issue here was transparency. If you say you are having a kid free wedding, that is what guests expect. And when they have gone out of their way to accommodate that and then find out that you made an exception for 10 kids, they will be annoyed. The bride and groom decide who to invite, but if my kids aren’t invited and other people’s are, I will decline if it is a hassle for me to attend without my kids. Clearly, in that scenario, the bride and groom value other people more than me (as is their right), so I get to decide how much inconvenience I am willing to put up with for them.
Bottom line, don’t lie to your guests to get them to come to your wedding.
My husband and I were recently invited to a wedding; my children were not. It never occurred to me to wonder or ask whether any other kids would be there. When I arrived, I didn’t sniff around to find out if that 6yo eating cake at Table 3 was the bride’s niece/the child of the sister in the wedding party. Know why? Because I was at Table 4, enjoying my own damn cake.
What is wrong with you people, honestly? Sometimes, DH and I attend wedding and have my parents stay with our kids. In some cases, the one of us directly connected to the bride or groom attends the wedding, and the other one of us stays home with the kids. If our kids are invited, great! If not, fine. An invitation is not a summons, and so we know if attending would be a hardship, we decline. Or one of us goes. Or both of us go and we eat cake and have hotel sex.
Honestly, again, what is wrong with you hall monitor types?
Oh come on. The OP didn’t have half the resources you do, yet she still went, brought her husband, and got a babysitter for her child. She’s not even going to get to have hotel sex because the kid is going to be there. What else do you want her to do?
Anonymous wrote:We went way out of our way to go to a wedding, brought the kids because there is no where to leave them, found a babysitter in the wedding town and arrive to see tons of kids at the wedding. They were all "in the wedding party" but still I was really pet peeved to see that they basically allowed the entire grooms family to bring their kids and no one else.
Is that normal? I thought no kids meant 0 kids not even in the wedding party.
Anonymous wrote:We went way out of our way to go to a wedding, brought the kids because there is no where to leave them, found a babysitter in the wedding town and arrive to see tons of kids at the wedding. They were all "in the wedding party" but still I was really pet peeved to see that they basically allowed the entire grooms family to bring their kids and no one else.
Is that normal? I thought no kids meant 0 kids not even in the wedding party.