Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

If national public health guidance, local public health guidance, the behavior of nearly all schools globally and nationally, and the behavior of most schools locally isn't enough to make them calm, what's two weeks going to do?

I wonder if there are parents that just believe that their charters will...uh....not lift the indoor mask mandates, particularly for 3-4 YOs. That's what parents in my charter are advocating for.

Parents at our charter do not seem to want PK3-4 to lift indoor mask mandates until a vaccine is available - which seems reasonable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

If national public health guidance, local public health guidance, the behavior of nearly all schools globally and nationally, and the behavior of most schools locally isn't enough to make them calm, what's two weeks going to do?

I wonder if there are parents that just believe that their charters will...uh....not lift the indoor mask mandates, particularly for 3-4 YOs. That's what parents in my charter are advocating for.

LOL the people in my neighborhood (speaking of my two blocks) all have their kids go to charter or OOB. Like, the people that have been here for 30 years don't send their kids to the neighborhood school. Gasp! It's also true that we have charters IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, so some of my neighbors attend our same charter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

This is such a cheap shot. Guess what: deciding to send your kid to a charter school does not mean you have no right yo criticize the administration of your charter just because your IB is an option. I am SO SICK of people shutting down people who ask questions, especially when admins make frankly stupid decisions. I am grateful to the people who challenge our charter leadership to do better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

If national public health guidance, local public health guidance, the behavior of nearly all schools globally and nationally, and the behavior of most schools locally isn't enough to make them calm, what's two weeks going to do?

This. This should really be decided at the state level for all schools, whether private, public, or charter. School administrators aren't public health officials or experts, and neither are parents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

If national public health guidance, local public health guidance, the behavior of nearly all schools globally and nationally, and the behavior of most schools locally isn't enough to make them calm, what's two weeks going to do?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

It gives those parents time to calm down. I am not one of them but I could have been.

Its not killing your kid to wear a mask for two more weeks. Also, its a charter. You are choosing to be there and now you are pissed they don't do what you say. Its not a private school. You can go IB but then gasp you will be around people in your neighborhood.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Your HS English teacher must be rolling over in her grave.

You must not know what parochial means.

The grammar police just come in when they don't have any other point to make. It's like an ad hominem but somewhat more pathetic.

I'm just trying to figure out what was wrong with my sentence. I'm not a native speaker and always eager to learn!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Your HS English teacher must be rolling over in her grave.

You must not know what parochial means.

The grammar police just come in when they don't have any other point to make. It's like an ad hominem but somewhat more pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Your HS English teacher must be rolling over in her grave.

You must not know what parochial means.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Indeed. So small-minded. They've turned into the people from The Village.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Your HS English teacher must be rolling over in her grave.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

You're saying that each individual charter leader is going to conduct a study that will quell the fears of the anxious parents in two weeks? Because charter leaders are epidemiologists or public health experts?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?

Ha! This. People are so incredibly parochial about this.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe they want to give a little time to see if the unmasking (combined with regular testing) leads to a lot of positives, which would keep a lot of kids out of school. What’s a couple weeks? Let the rest of DC experiment first.

There's data from other places. It's not like DC is going first, or that science is different here. A couple weeks more is a couple weeks more of ignoring public health guidance. It's not enough to be in the last 10% of schools to mask, we're really competing to be in that last 1%?