Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't worry our fearless leader, Joe, has got this! He will stop the nuclear threat without fail. lol.
If only he had adopted his predecessor’s strategy with Putin: bending over and coquettishly spreading his ass cheeks.
Better that then the idiot we have now.
Oh, sweetie.
Anonymous wrote:Northern Idaho?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone else stressed enough in life that the thought of being vaporized by a nuclear missile is almost comforting?
no, just me?
I'm not depressed but between my job, husband, 3 teenagers and high school drama/academics/spring sports tryouts, etc I'm kind of ok with vaporization.
I don’t think you really understand what being *dead* means. This isn’t a video game. You don’t get to re-spawn and start playing again.
Every other problem you have in your life is pretty damn trivial compared to being DEAD. You don’t seem to get that.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else stressed enough in life that the thought of being vaporized by a nuclear missile is almost comforting?
no, just me?
I'm not depressed but between my job, husband, 3 teenagers and high school drama/academics/spring sports tryouts, etc I'm kind of ok with vaporization.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone else stressed enough in life that the thought of being vaporized by a nuclear missile is almost comforting?
no, just me?
I'm not depressed but between my job, husband, 3 teenagers and high school drama/academics/spring sports tryouts, etc I'm kind of ok with vaporization.
Anonymous wrote:But seriously, where would be safe? Just hypothetically? Spearman Texas? Every time someone says a place, people counter by saying, no, that’s actually a strategic area that would be nuked. So where would be safest?
Anonymous wrote:But seriously, where would be safe? Just hypothetically? Spearman Texas? Every time someone says a place, people counter by saying, no, that’s actually a strategic area that would be nuked. So where would be safest?
Anonymous wrote:New Jersey?
Anonymous wrote:But seriously, where would be safe? Just hypothetically? Spearman Texas? Every time someone says a place, people counter by saying, no, that’s actually a strategic area that would be nuked. So where would be safest?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe the movie War Games hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread! Maybe it's because I'm also Gen X, but I saw that movie many times.
Global Thermonuclear War. "A curious game. The only winning move is not to play."
+1.
Nice. Might have to rewatch again with the kids this weekend.
Watch Jericho -- someone said on Netflix. Read Alas, Babylon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Two nuclear bombs used in WWII were about 15-20KT. The old AEC building in Germantown (currently DOEnergy) was built just outside of blast zone (30 miles from downtown DC) of similar sized weapon. Modern nuclear weapons are thousands of times more powerful than the Little Boy and the Fat Man used in WWII. So, yeah, you will have no chance surviving. But you can try.
+1. I don't you think people understand the magnitude of modern day nuclear weapons.
No chance in an all out attack. That is not the only scenario.