Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is the administration is relatively young. Some older administrators retired, but Kowalik brought in colleagues from his old school and cleared out many as well. Administrators and teachers compare parenting their toddlers and early elementary aged children to parenting high school students which is very different. This creates the arrogant attitude that they know better than the parent body, and in my opinion from where some of the mental health issues arise. I am curious to see if their attitude changes when their children come of high school age.
This is highly distressing. Am I reading correctly that the administrators have little experience with children other than their own?? Learning on the job or waiting for their kids to age is highly what I would expect at that price point. I have friends who attended Potomac and who’ve been noncommittal about sending their own kids there (though I think they eventually will) and we’re considering it. Some of the comments here are disappointing even though I know it is all biased
Anonymous wrote:There is an honors science program, a world politics program, and an arts program, all of which have limited admissions that are competitive. I don't think there is anything wrong with a competitive entry program - not everyone gets in so that there can be a smaller class with more focus. That said, Potomac has let that approach spread, so there are now barriers to a number of other honors courses. In theory, those are just intended to make sure the student can handle the work but with things like AP English (or its equivalent, now that Potomac dumped APs), but that is overkill. Kids should be able to challenge themselves if they want (maybe subject to parent approval). Some of the admins are a little power crazed. It is exceedingly irritating to have the school talk about mental health/pressure so frequently and then create all these extra stressors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is the administration is relatively young. Some older administrators retired, but Kowalik brought in colleagues from his old school and cleared out many as well. Administrators and teachers compare parenting their toddlers and early elementary aged children to parenting high school students which is very different. This creates the arrogant attitude that they know better than the parent body, and in my opinion from where some of the mental health issues arise. I am curious to see if their attitude changes when their children come of high school age.
This is highly distressing. Am I reading correctly that the administrators have little experience with children other than their own?? Learning on the job or waiting for their kids to age is highly what I would expect at that price point. I have friends who attended Potomac and who’ve been noncommittal about sending their own kids there (though I think they eventually will) and we’re considering it. Some of the comments here are disappointing even though I know it is all biased
Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is the administration is relatively young. Some older administrators retired, but Kowalik brought in colleagues from his old school and cleared out many as well. Administrators and teachers compare parenting their toddlers and early elementary aged children to parenting high school students which is very different. This creates the arrogant attitude that they know better than the parent body, and in my opinion from where some of the mental health issues arise. I am curious to see if their attitude changes when their children come of high school age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who was thinking about applying to Potomac for 7th grade entry year, this thread is beyond depressing.
As a current Potomac family with children in multiple divisions, I would not believe a lot of it. Tour the school, talk to current families, attend events (not just admissions ones but sports, theater, festivals, etc) and see what you think. A lot of things said on here are not true. We have been thrilled with the school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who was thinking about applying to Potomac for 7th grade entry year, this thread is beyond depressing.
As a current Potomac family with children in multiple divisions, I would not believe a lot of it. Tour the school, talk to current families, attend events (not just admissions ones but sports, theater, festivals, etc) and see what you think. A lot of things said on here are not true. We have been thrilled with the school
You are an absolute fool if you think people would come on an anonymous chat board and make things up. Just because what people are saying isn’t your reality doesn’t mean everything being said is not 100% true. The school has a lot to offer but not every child has an amazing experience and it’s not just sour grapes to blame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who was thinking about applying to Potomac for 7th grade entry year, this thread is beyond depressing.
As a current Potomac family with children in multiple divisions, I would not believe a lot of it. Tour the school, talk to current families, attend events (not just admissions ones but sports, theater, festivals, etc) and see what you think. A lot of things said on here are not true. We have been thrilled with the school
Anonymous wrote:As someone who was thinking about applying to Potomac for 7th grade entry year, this thread is beyond depressing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The prior posts are garbled to the extent that they are unclear whether poster is talking about Langley or Potomac. But we had 3 go through Potomac and never were asked to sign anything
So weird how two parents at the same school had such different experiences! Different time periods? No overlap in teachers? Someone lying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t we hear this kind of thing about other schools though? Are the Saint Albans academic awards pure meritocracy? Does Sidwell help every student with college equally? Is GDS not filled with children of Ivy grads? Et cetera.
Even if the case that a subjective selection is through its very nature (humans decide) intrinsically flawed, it is no different from what many schools do for a variety of reasons. I would want to know more about the selection process.
These are separate formal programs within the school that students apply for with applications and interviews in 10th grade. Only about ten are accepted into each program so about 30 students of a class of about 125 benefit. It is not open to all, and the criteria is not transparent. The students in these programs are fast tracked with combined and extra classes, have access to field trips (pre-Covid) and speakers, and receive additional mentoring on applying for research positions. I pay the same tuition as the parents of students in these programs even though their children are receiving a better, more tailored and enhanced experience than my child. If my child wants to participate and does not get accepted to one of these programs, the burden is on her to do research on her own, do her own projects, ask for help from teachers where as the students accepted do this as part of their coursework. In many ways, it creates a divide, and the halo effect of the programs carries over to other classes, college counseling and other opportunities. For example, the students in the science program are coached to produce research submitted to national competitions. These research opportunities make them more competitive for colleges and other programs. It is a micro Gladwell effect.