Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t be more transparent
If it’s a center school with high performing kids and let’s say’s 4 other school feeds into it AAP
Level IV kids from 3rd grade.
Consider this scenario-
center school cutoff 140
Out of 4 schools that feed into it 2 have a cut off so 140 and other 2 have a cut off of 132, since they are not that high performing. The kids who come from the two schools with 132 cutoff will take the spots of kids from other 3 schools who have scored between 132 and 139.
This can happen, right? This is the reason they can’t be transparent.
Anonymous wrote:Somebody should do a FOIA.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t be more transparent
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand why they can’t be more transparent
Anonymous wrote:They must be using the local norms at both lower- and higher-performing schools. Sounds like the standard 132 cut-off is out the window.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got ours today in my daughter’s backpack. We are Oakton Pyramid. She scored a 138 composite but we didn’t get an in pool email. Could the cut off this year been higher than 132?
The most likely scenario is that Gatehouse has an incorrect or outdated email address, or the email was delivered to your spam folder.
So far 2 people claim that they had a score over 132 and were not notified of being in-pool.
I confirmed with our AART person and 138 (despite being 99th percentile) was not in pool this year. Apparently the pool is smaller than past years.
Wow. So they must be using local norms rather than national everywhere this year. Sounds like your school had some very high scores.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got ours today in my daughter’s backpack. We are Oakton Pyramid. She scored a 138 composite but we didn’t get an in pool email. Could the cut off this year been higher than 132?
The most likely scenario is that Gatehouse has an incorrect or outdated email address, or the email was delivered to your spam folder.
So far 2 people claim that they had a score over 132 and were not notified of being in-pool.
I confirmed with our AART person and 138 (despite being 99th percentile) was not in pool this year. Apparently the pool is smaller than past years.
Huh? I am confused138 and not in pool? This doesn't sound right.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got ours today in my daughter’s backpack. We are Oakton Pyramid. She scored a 138 composite but we didn’t get an in pool email. Could the cut off this year been higher than 132?
The most likely scenario is that Gatehouse has an incorrect or outdated email address, or the email was delivered to your spam folder.
So far 2 people claim that they had a score over 132 and were not notified of being in-pool.
I confirmed with our AART person and 138 (despite being 99th percentile) was not in pool this year. Apparently the pool is smaller than past years.
138 and not in pool? This doesn't sound right. Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got ours today in my daughter’s backpack. We are Oakton Pyramid. She scored a 138 composite but we didn’t get an in pool email. Could the cut off this year been higher than 132?
The most likely scenario is that Gatehouse has an incorrect or outdated email address, or the email was delivered to your spam folder.
So far 2 people claim that they had a score over 132 and were not notified of being in-pool.
I confirmed with our AART person and 138 (despite being 99th percentile) was not in pool this year. Apparently the pool is smaller than past years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got ours today in my daughter’s backpack. We are Oakton Pyramid. She scored a 138 composite but we didn’t get an in pool email. Could the cut off this year been higher than 132?
The most likely scenario is that Gatehouse has an incorrect or outdated email address, or the email was delivered to your spam folder.
So far 2 people claim that they had a score over 132 and were not notified of being in-pool.