Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that’s super interesting about this hearing is that it turns out the homeowner actually did use a contractor who misrepresented himself as licensed but previously had his licensed taken away for telling people they had to put down owner as contractor and pull their own permits. That’s a huge mitigating factor for the homeowner.
Don't homeowners need to do their own due diligence?
It is not as if licenses are not public info.
Anonymous wrote:One thing that’s super interesting about this hearing is that it turns out the homeowner actually did use a contractor who misrepresented himself as licensed but previously had his licensed taken away for telling people they had to put down owner as contractor and pull their own permits. That’s a huge mitigating factor for the homeowner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just watched the hearing.
It is annoying that the homeowner cried about how this huge addition is for his family but made zero - zero - comments about how it affects his neighbors. Uncool.
Agree with the comments on how overturning the denial will lead to people doing whatever they want, then crying for relief later from the county.
All they'd have to do is claim they were "taken in by an unscrupulous contractor." Due diligence should absolutely be the standard; otherwise, why have standards at all?
Also agree with the neighbors that this is a homeowner that repeatedly flouted zoning and permitting requirements in the past. (They built additions/enclosed their garage without permits/inspections). They also clearly understood things needed permits, having had started but not completed the processes at the time. Shady
That’s contrary to how fraud works in Virginia. If you’re thrown off your guard by a fraudster’s false representation, they’re liable even if you could have discovered their fraud with research. Review Van Deusen v. Snead.
Anonymous wrote:These multiple Greenbriar residents are CRYING making statements. I’m rolling my eyes.
These people should’ve bought in an HOA, especially since Fairfax County is majority HOAs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HO lost appeal.
I thought they didn’t rule?
Anonymous wrote:Just watched the hearing.
It is annoying that the homeowner cried about how this huge addition is for his family but made zero - zero - comments about how it affects his neighbors. Uncool.
Agree with the comments on how overturning the denial will lead to people doing whatever they want, then crying for relief later from the county.
All they'd have to do is claim they were "taken in by an unscrupulous contractor." Due diligence should absolutely be the standard; otherwise, why have standards at all?
Also agree with the neighbors that this is a homeowner that repeatedly flouted zoning and permitting requirements in the past. (They built additions/enclosed their garage without permits/inspections). They also clearly understood things needed permits, having had started but not completed the processes at the time. Shady
Anonymous wrote:HO lost appeal.
Anonymous wrote:So, what happens now?