Anonymous
05/13/2024 22:04
Subject: Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Who said that? It is the prosecutors trying to imply that NDAs and this 'conspiracy' or 'scheme' is illegal.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 21:28
Subject: Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Wait I thought the story was that Trump didn’t have anything to do with this.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 21:18
Subject: Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Thanks for agreeing that Trump did this.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 19:13
Subject: Indictment Monday?
National Enquirer guy said he did this for Trump going back decades. Trump wasn't running for President then.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 17:48
Subject: Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:Trump's excuse is that he didn't want Melania finding out. Somehow I doubt wife #3 would find any of this surprising.
He used to feed the tabloids tales of his own philandering, under the name John Baron.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 17:10
Subject: Indictment Monday?
Trump's excuse is that he didn't want Melania finding out. Somehow I doubt wife #3 would find any of this surprising.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 17:02
Subject: Re:Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
In what ways did it contradict them?
Dp. It didn’t. Remember bannon’s maxim: flood the zone with shit so everyone gets too exhausted to care.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 16:59
Subject: Re:Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
In what ways did it contradict them?
Anonymous
05/13/2024 16:54
Subject: Re:Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
The Trump family is a mob family. Cohen is credible when he talks about what he did for years to advance Mr Trump’s interests.
Anonymous
05/13/2024 16:44
Subject: Re:Indictment Monday?
Anonymous wrote:No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Directly conflicting the testimony of Hope Hicks and Madeleine Westerhout.
Who is more credible? (It's not a convicted felon and serial liar)
Anonymous
05/13/2024 16:39
Subject: Re:Indictment Monday?
No surprise in Cohen’s testimony today. But he’s certainly clarifying that Trump was worried about the damage the porn stars would do to his presidential campaign.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous