Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that’s super interesting about this hearing is that it turns out the homeowner actually did use a contractor who misrepresented himself as licensed but previously had his licensed taken away for telling people they had to put down owner as contractor and pull their own permits. That’s a huge mitigating factor for the homeowner.
The HO is shady. If he thought he was using a legit contractor, he should never signed the permitting paperwork with that he was contractor. He certified that he was the contractor in all the permitting paperwork. Not buying is naive persona
Not everyone has the same sophistication or experience as you. It takes most of us learning our lesson the hard way to start checking things like that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that’s super interesting about this hearing is that it turns out the homeowner actually did use a contractor who misrepresented himself as licensed but previously had his licensed taken away for telling people they had to put down owner as contractor and pull their own permits. That’s a huge mitigating factor for the homeowner.
The HO is shady. If he thought he was using a legit contractor, he should never signed the permitting paperwork with that he was contractor. He certified that he was the contractor in all the permitting paperwork. Not buying is naive persona
Anonymous wrote:One thing that’s super interesting about this hearing is that it turns out the homeowner actually did use a contractor who misrepresented himself as licensed but previously had his licensed taken away for telling people they had to put down owner as contractor and pull their own permits. That’s a huge mitigating factor for the homeowner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
The contractor the homeowner used falsely represented himself as licensed and previously had his licensed revoked.
There's websites where you can verify these things...
You still can’t make a material misrepresentation of fact. That’s fraud and also a crime (when it comes to misrepresenting that you’re a licensed professional). Not everyone (especially immigrant families) has the same sophistication as you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
The contractor the homeowner used falsely represented himself as licensed and previously had his licensed revoked.
There's websites where you can verify these things...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
The contractor the homeowner used falsely represented himself as licensed and previously had his licensed revoked.
There's websites where you can verify these things...
Also, the first time H.O. was asked, he said Soto represented himself as an architect and something else, not a contractor. Only when asked a third time later did he claim Soto misrepresented himself as a contractor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
The contractor the homeowner used falsely represented himself as licensed and previously had his licensed revoked.
There's websites where you can verify these things...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
The contractor the homeowner used falsely represented himself as licensed and previously had his licensed revoked.
Anonymous wrote:Exhibit A as to why you should always use a licensed and bonded contractor!
Anonymous wrote:For anyone interested in some background listening, the BZA is currently meeting at this moment and the live feed is available here:
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/cableconsumer/channel-16/stream