Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani’s economic populism isn’t radical - it’s reactive.

After decades of corporate greed, stagnant wages, and soaring costs of housing, food, and everything else, his socialism is a direct response to a broken system that's failed the majority of Americans.

This is true. However, his reactionary policies won't address the causes of these bad economic outcomes but will instead make them worse.

Works just fine in many other countries. NYC is practically its own small country, so it’s a great place to pilot it in the US.

In which country does it work just fine?

Any democratic socialist country works to make things better for its population, and they run many public-private partnerships, as would be the case here.

This is not a radical idea, but it seems that some people have really been conditioned to hate the idea of people getting benefits from their tax money. Pretty weird if you ask me.

https://theweek.com/politics/mamdani-government-run-grocery-stores

https://www.modernretail.co/operations/unpacked-the-history-of-city-owned-grocery-stores-and-how-public-private-partnerships-have-worked-in-other-markets/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/06/25/zohran-mamdanis-most-surprising-proposals-from-city-owned-grocery-stores-to-arresting-netanyahu/

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/mamdani-city-run-groceries

LOL

Why is there no food in this government owned grocery store?

Mamdani apparently wants to starve poor New Yorkers.

Mamdani is sheer evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism not done right is the problem. Anything extreme doesn’t work. Why can’t people accept there are programs called socialist programs that are necessary and working alongside non corrupt capitalism would work.

Capitalism has a huge problem though, it’s greed and corruption. And capitalists are the first ones that want to eliminate regulations to keep corruption and greed in check.

Once the most corrupt broken administration leaves office maybe the country two can work together. Just like the most successful countries in the world

The institutions that make this a first world civilized nation are all socialist (public schools, police, fire departments, city water departments, libraries, public parks, even public restrooms).

The US is not a capitalist country and hasn’t been for over a century now. A real capitalist country is not one where most people would want to live

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.

-Milton Friedman

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think the establishment realizes that people love Mamdani’s ideas about expanding social services because it’s been gutted for so long.

Opposite is true.
It has been enlarged for so long.

For migrants yes. Not for Americans. Eric adams is toast for that. The city hates him for that and the city hates Cuomo. Those are Mamdani’s rivals in the general.

Mamdani’s biggest mistake would be trying to block ICE and he seems like he has the nerve to try. He doesn’t have authority to stop the Feds and if he tries to impede, Trump will probably get him arrested and possibly detained by ice as well

He loved his videos of blocking ICE and yelling and spitting in their faces and at their faces.

Those videos do t go away PP. Not the articles. Nor his behavior then or anytime the last five years of being an unemployed rich boy activist running around NY doing nothing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani’s economic populism isn’t radical - it’s reactive.

After decades of corporate greed, stagnant wages, and soaring costs of housing, food, and everything else, his socialism is a direct response to a broken system that's failed the majority of Americans.

This is true. However, his reactionary policies won't address the causes of these bad economic outcomes but will instead make them worse.

Works just fine in many other countries. NYC is practically its own small country, so it’s a great place to pilot it in the US.

In which country does it work just fine?

Any democratic socialist country works to make things better for its population, and they run many public-private partnerships, as would be the case here.

This is not a radical idea, but it seems that some people have really been conditioned to hate the idea of people getting benefits from their tax money. Pretty weird if you ask me.

https://theweek.com/politics/mamdani-government-run-grocery-stores

https://www.modernretail.co/operations/unpacked-the-history-of-city-owned-grocery-stores-and-how-public-private-partnerships-have-worked-in-other-markets/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/06/25/zohran-mamdanis-most-surprising-proposals-from-city-owned-grocery-stores-to-arresting-netanyahu/

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/mamdani-city-run-groceries

LOL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani’s economic populism isn’t radical - it’s reactive.

After decades of corporate greed, stagnant wages, and soaring costs of housing, food, and everything else, his socialism is a direct response to a broken system that's failed the majority of Americans.

This is true. However, his reactionary policies won't address the causes of these bad economic outcomes but will instead make them worse.

Works just fine in many other countries. NYC is practically its own small country, so it’s a great place to pilot it in the US.

In which country does it work just fine?

Any democratic socialist country works to make things better for its population, and they run many public-private partnerships, as would be the case here.

This is not a radical idea, but it seems that some people have really been conditioned to hate the idea of people getting benefits from their tax money. Pretty weird if you ask me.

https://theweek.com/politics/mamdani-government-run-grocery-stores

https://www.modernretail.co/operations/unpacked-the-history-of-city-owned-grocery-stores-and-how-public-private-partnerships-have-worked-in-other-markets/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/06/25/zohran-mamdanis-most-surprising-proposals-from-city-owned-grocery-stores-to-arresting-netanyahu/

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/mamdani-city-run-groceries

LOL

Why is there no food in this government owned grocery store?

Mamdani apparently wants to starve poor New Yorkers.

Mamdani is sheer evil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mamdani’s economic populism isn’t radical - it’s reactive.

After decades of corporate greed, stagnant wages, and soaring costs of housing, food, and everything else, his socialism is a direct response to a broken system that's failed the majority of Americans.

This is true. However, his reactionary policies won't address the causes of these bad economic outcomes but will instead make them worse.

Works just fine in many other countries. NYC is practically its own small country, so it’s a great place to pilot it in the US.

In which country does it work just fine?

Any democratic socialist country works to make things better for its population, and they run many public-private partnerships, as would be the case here.

This is not a radical idea, but it seems that some people have really been conditioned to hate the idea of people getting benefits from their tax money. Pretty weird if you ask me.

https://theweek.com/politics/mamdani-government-run-grocery-stores

https://www.modernretail.co/operations/unpacked-the-history-of-city-owned-grocery-stores-and-how-public-private-partnerships-have-worked-in-other-markets/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2025/06/25/zohran-mamdanis-most-surprising-proposals-from-city-owned-grocery-stores-to-arresting-netanyahu/

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/mamdani-city-run-groceries

LOL

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism not done right is the problem. Anything extreme doesn’t work. Why can’t people accept there are programs called socialist programs that are necessary and working alongside non corrupt capitalism would work.

Capitalism has a huge problem though, it’s greed and corruption. And capitalists are the first ones that want to eliminate regulations to keep corruption and greed in check.

Once the most corrupt broken administration leaves office maybe the country two can work together. Just like the most successful countries in the world

The institutions that make this a first world civilized nation are all socialist (public schools, police, fire departments, city water departments, libraries, public parks, even public restrooms).

The US is not a capitalist country and hasn’t been for over a century now. A real capitalist country is not one where most people would want to live

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s July 24 and the still ongoing hand ringing over an uber liberal candidate just because he is of partial Muslim descent tells me more about a certain group’s deep seated and frankly alarming hatred than anything else.

I hope he wins

New york city Jews can leave to Israel

Get out of the US. We don’t need murderers in the US

The world has turned on the Jews

Anonymous wrote:Capitalism not done right is the problem. Anything extreme doesn’t work. Why can’t people accept there are programs called socialist programs that are necessary and working alongside non corrupt capitalism would work.

Capitalism has a huge problem though, it’s greed and corruption. And capitalists are the first ones that want to eliminate regulations to keep corruption and greed in check.

Once the most corrupt broken administration leaves office maybe the country two can work together. Just like the most successful countries in the world