Anonymous wrote:How many super y teams does GFR usually carry? signed up my DD for tryouts and didn't go and still got an offer. supposed to be coached by certain departure, not sure if that still stands/how that will work.

Historically I think they've usually had one team per age group, and occasionally combined years when necessary for numbers, although I think they are trying for a higher participation level this year and hopefully that won't happen.

on the coach, I think it'd be reasonable to email the USL-Y director (DB) with questions about coaching before accepting if you're in one of the potentially affected age groups.

How many super y teams does GFR usually carry? signed up my DD for tryouts and didn't go and still got an offer. supposed to be coached by certain departure, not sure if that still stands/how that will work.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bigger concern is she still hasn’t said anything to her players’ parents. With no GFR coaching slate for fall, many littles who wete expecting to play w/ her don’t know whether to stay or go. Plus resident camp, Super Y…..

No clue why GFR gave her the "Age Group Director" title after the Riverbend circus. Are the parents that were willing to go along with that going along for the TSJ ride now?

Anyone that willingly takes their DD to TSJ should be referred to child protective services. It might be the worst-performing GA club in the country with management to match.

They don't even have GA anymore. They got demoted to Aspire. SO yeah, anyone taking their kid from a top RL program to a club with Aspire is making questionable decisions.

TSJ and GFR don't have pathways. So you're quibbling over who has the better 2 tier option?

I am not quibbling over that at all b/c I know if my kid is good enough to play national level I can take them to a tryout/ID session and I don't need a "pathway" for that. I am pointing out that TSJ is a mess and GFR has a great girls program. I also think RL is superior to Aspire for girls so yeah, I guess if you want to argue 2nd tier.....we can do that.

GFR had a good, not great, girls program but it is being gutted by players and coaches moving on and will be a shell of itself in September.

We shall see. Plenty of good players and good coaches staying.

People said the same thing last spring and it turned out to be wishful thinking by a handful of haters.

Offers are out for GFR?

They didnt send out anything for boys yet?

Anonymous wrote:Have they sent it out a similar email for the older girls?

I think they plan to release the full slate later this week or early next week, but they sent this subset earlier for the younger girls because there were questions after a certain departure/TSJ hire was announced.

Have they sent it out a similar email for the older girls?

Anonymous wrote:We are pleased to announce that for the 2026-2027 season the slate is as follows:
U9 Blue, Danny Butler
U9 White, Carter Berg
U10 Blue, Matt Lee
U10 White, Gino Leon
U10 Green, TBA (employment agreement pending)
U11G Blue, Danny Butler
U11G White, TBD (employment agreement pending)
U11G Green, Gino Leon

Nice work, GFR. Wasted no time!

We are pleased to announce that for the 2026-2027 season the slate is as follows:
U9 Blue, Danny Butler
U9 White, Carter Berg
U10 Blue, Matt Lee
U10 White, Gino Leon
U10 Green, TBA (employment agreement pending)
U11G Blue, Danny Butler
U11G White, TBD (employment agreement pending)
U11G Green, Gino Leon

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What coaches? Can you give names and teams. Thanks

they sent one for u11 and under (many slots TBD) to parents and said full slate this week

There were only 2 TBD slots out of the 8 teams listed and both said they are pending contract agreements which means they probably have coaches and are just not able to announce them yet because they haven't communicated it if they're coming from other clubs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What coaches? Can you give names and teams. Thanks

they sent one for u11 and under (many slots TBD) to parents and said full slate this week

can you post it

Anonymous wrote:What coaches? Can you give names and teams. Thanks

they sent one for u11 and under (many slots TBD) to parents and said full slate this week

Anonymous wrote:What coaches? Can you give names and teams. Thanks

I was told the coaching slates will be announced by the end of the week.

What coaches? Can you give names and teams. Thanks

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bigger concern is she still hasn’t said anything to her players’ parents. With no GFR coaching slate for fall, many littles who wete expecting to play w/ her don’t know whether to stay or go. Plus resident camp, Super Y…..

No clue why GFR gave her the "Age Group Director" title after the Riverbend circus. Are the parents that were willing to go along with that going along for the TSJ ride now?

Anyone that willingly takes their DD to TSJ should be referred to child protective services. It might be the worst-performing GA club in the country with management to match.

They don't even have GA anymore. They got demoted to Aspire. SO yeah, anyone taking their kid from a top RL program to a club with Aspire is making questionable decisions.

TSJ and GFR don't have pathways. So you're quibbling over who has the better 2 tier option?

I am not quibbling over that at all b/c I know if my kid is good enough to play national level I can take them to a tryout/ID session and I don't need a "pathway" for that. I am pointing out that TSJ is a mess and GFR has a great girls program. I also think RL is superior to Aspire for girls so yeah, I guess if you want to argue 2nd tier.....we can do that.

GFR had a good, not great, girls program but it is being gutted by players and coaches moving on and will be a shell of itself in September.

We shall see. Plenty of good players and good coaches staying.

People said the same thing last spring and it turned out to be wishful thinking by a handful of haters.

Some upgraded coaching additions being made too! Super excited about DB and a few others I've heard are coming over!

Yippee!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bigger concern is she still hasn’t said anything to her players’ parents. With no GFR coaching slate for fall, many littles who wete expecting to play w/ her don’t know whether to stay or go. Plus resident camp, Super Y…..

No clue why GFR gave her the "Age Group Director" title after the Riverbend circus. Are the parents that were willing to go along with that going along for the TSJ ride now?

Anyone that willingly takes their DD to TSJ should be referred to child protective services. It might be the worst-performing GA club in the country with management to match.

They don't even have GA anymore. They got demoted to Aspire. SO yeah, anyone taking their kid from a top RL program to a club with Aspire is making questionable decisions.

TSJ and GFR don't have pathways. So you're quibbling over who has the better 2 tier option?

I am not quibbling over that at all b/c I know if my kid is good enough to play national level I can take them to a tryout/ID session and I don't need a "pathway" for that. I am pointing out that TSJ is a mess and GFR has a great girls program. I also think RL is superior to Aspire for girls so yeah, I guess if you want to argue 2nd tier.....we can do that.

GFR had a good, not great, girls program but it is being gutted by players and coaches moving on and will be a shell of itself in September.

We shall see. Plenty of good players and good coaches staying.

People said the same thing last spring and it turned out to be wishful thinking by a handful of haters.

Some upgraded coaching additions being made too! Super excited about DB and a few others I've heard are coming over!