Anonymous wrote:Rick is a good coach, but the program turned around because his daughter was amazing. There were some other girls in that area who were also excellent, and they wanted to play together. That got the ball rolling and now they have a program with a nearby talent pool that is strong and the school is 2x cheaper than SSSAS.
SSSAS is always going to be excellent, but they are relying more than ever on girls outside of Alexandria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there such a disparity between the BI girls lax program and BI boys lax program? It seems given the strength of the lax programs near the school (ALC, Fort Hunt, etc), they both should be strong not just the girls.
Because of Rick Sofield. He built the girls program from scratch. No one has ever been interested in the boys program.
Why not? Ireton has the area talent. With PVI moving further west, there may be a gap that BI can fill.
O'Connell will be the beneficary of PVI's move to Loudoun, not BI. To get things going, BI needs a minimum of: a good/great coach AND a number of kids that form the nucleus of a strong team to get the school some publicity. Then hopefully better kids come and it becomes self-sustaining.
They've been trying for years with no success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there such a disparity between the BI girls lax program and BI boys lax program? It seems given the strength of the lax programs near the school (ALC, Fort Hunt, etc), they both should be strong not just the girls.
Because of Rick Sofield. He built the girls program from scratch. No one has ever been interested in the boys program.
Why not? Ireton has the area talent. With PVI moving further west, there may be a gap that BI can fill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is there such a disparity between the BI girls lax program and BI boys lax program? It seems given the strength of the lax programs near the school (ALC, Fort Hunt, etc), they both should be strong not just the girls.
Because of Rick Sofield. He built the girls program from scratch. No one has ever been interested in the boys program.
Anonymous wrote:Why is there such a disparity between the BI girls lax program and BI boys lax program? It seems given the strength of the lax programs near the school (ALC, Fort Hunt, etc), they both should be strong not just the girls.
Anonymous wrote:its simple... they are offering MONEY / waiving tuition.
ASK the STAB transfer.
If I was an outstanding lacrosse player I'd look at Bullis. It seems that the Bullis program has been on a steep rise the past few years. But I wonder, why do these players want to transfer? Were they unhappy at their prior school? Is the Bullis coaching staff that good? Is it the new academic building on campus? Is it about financial aid? Does the team need the players? College connections? (Recent grads have gone on to play at top lacrosse and academic school) What is it that makes these players transfer to Bullis? What is IT that Bullis is selling, that kids and parents are buying?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One things is clear: NL DCE and Next Level are really hurting Madlax. Madlax is getting very few kids from Montgomery County any more. Most kids from suburban MD are going either to those clubs with some going to Crabs, FCA, BW and VLC. You are really seeing it affecting Madlax, which used to have a much bigger pool.
I almost feel sorry for Mr. Madlax. He's made money hand over first in part because he cornered the market on talent. His was the only game in town. That's changed. Take Next Level. Just look at the rosters for Next Level just published. A decade ago most of those players would have only one real choice - Madlax. No more.
Oh, if anyone had any doubt about why this "sports" thread is so popular (and is a natural intersect with) the private school community, just look at those rosters. Chockfull of the ritzy private schools.
Take that DELETE THIS THREAD maniac.