Anonymous wrote:Please provide these stats and and facts as from what I see, GC goalies have a significantly lower GAA in conference than other teams.

GC didn't give up 10 to AHC.

Stats don't always tell the story on a goalie. GAA might be more attributable to the defense (or draw control and offense) than to the goalie. Save percentage similarly can be a function of the quality of the defense (or lack thereof).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Saw all the WCAC goalies play this year.
BI Goalie was the best that I observed.

Are you the mom of the junior or dad of the senior?

I hate these kinds of responses. No one should say anything negative, which is right, but no one can say anything positive either without being accused of being a parent of the kid they are complimenting.

Annoying.

Call out the obvious self-promotion that does happen at times on these pages if you must, but in an anodyne post like the one above, or in a line of posts where others are posting about the good players making all-league or all-conference, it's just not enlightening.

Anonymous wrote:Saw all the WCAC goalies play this year.
BI Goalie was the best that I observed.

Are you the mom of the junior or dad of the senior?

Saw all the WCAC goalies play this year.
BI Goalie was the best that I observed.

Anonymous wrote:Is everyone sick of hearing about the GC-SJC game? Make it stop.

THAT CONVERSATION STOPPED SEVERAL DAYS AGO....

Is everyone sick of hearing about the GC-SJC game? Make it stop.

Anonymous wrote:Please provide these stats and and facts as from what I see, GC goalies have a significantly lower GAA in conference than other teams.

GC didn't give up 10 to AHC.

The lower GAA is because they do not see even remotely close to the same volume of shots as any of the other conference goalies, and it is not even close and that is due to the amazing ride and defense they have, kudos to the defenders.

In the 1st BI game, the 1st teamer faced 2 shots on goal and gave up 2 goals, 0 saves, save percentage of 0%..
The Honorable Mention (HM) goalie also played in that game and allowed 5 goals on 7 shots. 2 saves, save percentage of 28%
Then in the BI playoff game, the First Team goalie made 1 save on 5 shots on goal, save percentage of 20%
The HM gave up 5 goals on 5 shots, one of which was a turnover that led to an open-net goal.
Their performance in all of the conference games I watched was relatively the same.
Vs SJC in the title game, 1st team faced 1 shot on goal, gave up 1 goal, 0 saves save percentage 0%.
HM gave up 4 goals on 5 shots on goal, had 1 save, save percentage 20%
The FB commit played very well in that game and had several key saves when she was in. gave up 2 goals on 5 shots on goal. save percentage 40%

Now, explain what the comment GC didn't give up 10 to AHC is even supposed to mean?

Head-to-head also matters when evaluating the top tier. And GC comes out on top.

SJC's 2 1st team players carried quite the load and the rest were inconsistent throughout the year. I'd imagine the 2nd team freshman could have been first if she was more consistent because when she was on, she was very strong.

Please provide these stats and and facts as from what I see, GC goalies have a significantly lower GAA in conference than other teams.

GC didn't give up 10 to AHC.

Anonymous wrote:For WCAC, the best players are on GC had have been since COVID. And for the most part it isn't even close. Only real close conference game for them was a game without their head coach on senior night. If the championship had been closer there may have been more arguments, but it wasn't. Other than the 2 that did make 1st team, it was the right call. It's about the best players in the conference not giving each team a few slots. Every coach gets to pick their own 3 HM players. 1st and 2nd team are voted on.

Since we have seen GC, SJC, and BI post but PVI hasn't posted, it looks highly likely that their Florida commit got POTY. You could have argued Ryken goalie for 1st team since GC split time often with their goalies (all 3 played in title game) but realistically it is just not close.

Agree that GC clearly should have the most selectees, but 7 first team is certainly a lot. Not going to quibble with individual selections, because that's not appropriate.

PVI middle getting POTY makes sense if your analysis is correct. Great player, seems like a nice kid, and carried a lot of the weight for PVI on both sides of the ball. BI and SJC first team selections also make sense, in my view. BI Florida commit and SJC Yale commit were outstanding this season. Two impressive Sophomores (GC and SJC) on First Team as well. Will be exciting to see where they commit..

Some really good players on Second Team and a few in HM as well. Good to see some younger players get noticed.

But do you watch film of every single game of every single team? No you don't. You don't see how these goalies play against the other opponents.

When you can not argue against the facts that they do not see enough shots, and of the ones they do see, they are not saving most of them try and divert the attention. Oh, everyone, hey hey don't pay attention to that look over here at this shiny object... dips**t

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For WCAC, the best players are on GC had have been since COVID. And for the most part, it isn't even close. Only real close conference game for them was a game without their head coach on senior night. If the championship had been closer, there may have been more arguments, but it wasn't. Other than the 2 that did make 1st team, it was the right call. It's about the best players in the conference not giving each team a few slots. Every coach gets to pick their own 3 HM players. 1st and 2nd team are voted on.

Since we have seen GC, SJC, and BI post but PVI hasn't posted, it looks highly likely that their Florida commit got POTY. You could have argued Ryken goalie for 1st team since GC split time often with their goalies (all 3 played in title game) but realistically it is just not close.

I've watched them play in person four times and reviewed plenty of film.

I wish I had the same amount of time on my hands.

I guess you're doing life wrong, maybe if you had chosen a different profession you would have more free time to do things...

Hope you are getting paid the big dollar to watch all of that film of high school girls lacrosse after going to so many games in person. I prefer the actual time with my kids.

I watch film with my daughters, you tool..

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For WCAC, the best players are on GC had have been since COVID. And for the most part, it isn't even close. Only real close conference game for them was a game without their head coach on senior night. If the championship had been closer, there may have been more arguments, but it wasn't. Other than the 2 that did make 1st team, it was the right call. It's about the best players in the conference not giving each team a few slots. Every coach gets to pick their own 3 HM players. 1st and 2nd team are voted on.

Since we have seen GC, SJC, and BI post but PVI hasn't posted, it looks highly likely that their Florida commit got POTY. You could have argued Ryken goalie for 1st team since GC split time often with their goalies (all 3 played in title game) but realistically it is just not close.

I've watched them play in person four times and reviewed plenty of film.

I wish I had the same amount of time on my hands.

I guess you're doing life wrong, maybe if you had chosen a different profession you would have more free time to do things...

Hope you are getting paid the big dollar to watch all of that film of high school girls lacrosse after going to so many games in person. I prefer the actual time with my kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For WCAC, the best players are on GC had have been since COVID. And for the most part, it isn't even close. Only real close conference game for them was a game without their head coach on senior night. If the championship had been closer, there may have been more arguments, but it wasn't. Other than the 2 that did make 1st team, it was the right call. It's about the best players in the conference not giving each team a few slots. Every coach gets to pick their own 3 HM players. 1st and 2nd team are voted on.

Since we have seen GC, SJC, and BI post but PVI hasn't posted, it looks highly likely that their Florida commit got POTY. You could have argued Ryken goalie for 1st team since GC split time often with their goalies (all 3 played in title game) but realistically it is just not close.

I've watched them play in person four times and reviewed plenty of film.

I wish I had the same amount of time on my hands.

I guess you're doing life wrong, maybe if you had chosen a different profession you would have more free time to do things...