Anonymous wrote:So many unanswered questions. Especially about CB not having clothes on. That would have to be perfectly timed by BB for Joe to show up when she was in the shower. And how hard would it have been to take her clothes off her after she was wounded?

Another horrifying thought is the amount of time that elapsed between just CB and Joe before the others showed up. What did they both think was going on? Did he think he was role playing and she thought she was actually being assaulted?

I know no one has answers. I assume so much of this timeline doesn't make sense because we don't know the evidence. I hope LE has it.

Anonymous wrote:So many unanswered questions. Especially about CB not having clothes on. That would have to be perfectly timed by BB for Joe to show up when she was in the shower. And how hard would it have been to take her clothes off her after she was wounded?

Another horrifying thought is the amount of time that elapsed between just CB and Joe before the others showed up. What did they both think was going on? Did he think he was role playing and she thought she was actually being assaulted?

I know no one has answers. I assume so much of this timeline doesn't make sense because we don't know the evidence. I hope LE has it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also, if BB was trying to make it look like Joe stabbed CB, wouldn't Joe's fingerprints have to be on the knife? Somebody's fingerprints have to be on that knife. Even if BB wiped them off, how was he planning to tie the knife to Joe?

Maybe it was Joe's knife. Maybe whoever set it up told him come over at set time "the door will be unlocked" and come in with a knife to make it more exciting. Maybe whoever set it up (BB) made her cell phone unavailable so she couldn't call for help. He comes in room shoots JR then begins stabing CB. AP comes in but JR is still alive. BB is busy killing CB while possibly fighting off injured JR and instructed AP to get gun. Just a random thought.

Anonymous wrote:Also, if BB was trying to make it look like Joe stabbed CB, wouldn't Joe's fingerprints have to be on the knife? Somebody's fingerprints have to be on that knife. Even if BB wiped them off, how was he planning to tie the knife to Joe?

Anonymous wrote:https://imgur.com/a/w87p8fN

Here is an image of the safe where the second gun was retrieved. It appears to be a dial style safe. First, in the chaos of the moment, we are supposed to believe the AP can correctly dial in the combination quickly? Second, why would your AP ever need to know your gun safe combination? Was BB shouting it out to her? Did she already have it memorized? Was is conveniently left open that morning? A lot of questions.

Anonymous wrote:I see the "CSI effect" in these posts.

There is certainly probably cause to arrest him. There are bodies and he was there.

There are plenty of holes in his story. Plenty of fishy facts -- gun range; affair; phones wiped. I am sure there are more.

He had motive. JR did not.

A jury could convict. Of course, better to have the AP flip, so they are trying that.

Not a given a jury would convict, but definitely a possibility. They don't need an eye witness; that typically doesn't happen.

Yes, the fact the AP will tell the same story is an issue, but the jury could also find her not credible, in on the murders, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have so many questions about the second gun and the need for the AP to use it...

*Why would BB, a trained LEO with a service weapon on him which he had already used once, need assistance from his employee to access a second gun and finish off the "intruder" when he could have easily done that himself? What possible reason could he have thought up to give authorities for the need for assistance from the AP?

*Obviously, having the AP shoot the second gun was part of BB's plan, but how was BB planning to explain to authorities why his employee knew the location of the gun, the combination of the safe, and how to use the gun? It can't be common practice for households that employ au pairs and have gun safes with guns in them to instruct the au pair on how to access and use the gun. You might instruct them on how to use an alarm system or dial 911 but teach them how to access a gun? Doesn't make sense.

*It seems like BB wanted the AP to be complicit in the shooting, which is why he took her to the gun range to train her on how to use the gun, subsequently purchased a gun for her to use, told her how to access it, and then told her to use it on Joe. But what convoluted reason could he have possibly given her for why she needed to do that in the first place? Was he thinking it would somehow make him personally less culpable if there was a second shooter?

Make it make sense!

It isn't just that he was incapacitated by the first shot. But the fact that JR couldn't have posed a real danger, if they had time to go get a gun from a safe. That was the killer admission by her. That that time elapsed and she had time to do that (versus running away).

I have had the same questions. If they thought Ryan was still a threat even after being shot/ blinded, why did they take the time for her to go to the safe get the code to open the safe, retrieve the gun and shoot it instead of him just shooting again. It just doesn’t make sense.

It makes perfect sense if you think of it more like a gang initiation. She would have reason to keep silent.

Aren't Law Enforcement Officers are trained to keep shooting until they have neutralized the threat? So, it really makes no sense for BB to stop with one shot... unless he is claiming he was in a physical fight with JR or JR knocked BB's gun away. I haven't heard that. So, the only other reason for BB to seek help from the AP to finish the job of killing JR is for her to get her hands dirty as well.

Since BB knows that HE stabbed CB, and AP knows that BB stabbed CB --- BB needed to bring AP into the crime as much as he was in it. She had to be willing to kill for him and then they would both claim self-defense.

Yep. And she did not realize her claim would be somewhat neutralized by being the 2nd shot. He was incapacitated already.

It's going to be hard to PROVE that he was the one communicating with JR, even if true. I think charging her first and trying to gain her testimony was the most prudent approach, especially since her visa was expiring. If she left and went back to Brazil would have been an even higher chance of BB skating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone is going on about flipping the AP and offering her a plea deal. That can be picked apart just like offering her citizenship (after some jail time) as part of the plea.

BB was federal law enforcement. I could make the case that it is in the feds interests to put away this guy for life. He killed two people.

Plea deals are pretty routine. A state cannot offer US citizenship.

It's in everyone's interests to put him away. Will require solid proof that he was the stabber to do so.

People like him operate with a world view that rules don't apply to them. There may be other antisocial acts or abuse of power at IRS. Again, would likely take someone coming forward. That is not in the jurisdiction of the Commonwealth of VA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is the trial set to April 15? Where?

No, April 15 is when the grand jury will hear the evidence to see if there’s enough for her to be indicted in the circuit court… if they move forward which hopefully they will, they will then set a trial date. No way will that be anytime soon.

I don’t know where you found this info. I was there yesterday, and there’s no info in the VA court records that show a date in april 15.
But the judge yesterday already approved the process to move forward. That’s what was done yesterday.