A Texas obstetrician watched as the pregnant woman she was caring for got sicker and sicker.
The woman was 19 weeks pregnant, the fetus too young to survive outside the womb. Her water had broken, an ultrasound showing no amniotic fluid around the baby. In states where abortion is allowed, doctors would offer to terminate the pregnancy, since pregnant women in this situation have a high likelihood of developing an infection and becoming septic, which is a life-threatening emergency.
But in Texas, where strict limitations on abortion took effect more than a year ago, doctors fear criminal and civil prosecution if they offer termination before the mother is on the brink of death.
“Literally, we’ve had to watch patients deteriorate in front of our eyes,” said the doctor, a specialist in high-risk pregnancies who works at a public university.
Since the passage of the Texas laws, some women have been denied abortions even when their lives were in danger and the fetus had fatal birth defects and would die within minutes of birth. Others have been denied abortions even after the fetus had died.
In the past year, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center has issued more than 150 news releases detailing advances in the lab, studies conducted by its doctors, awards for its researchers and a new culinary medicine program, among dozens of other topics.
But when five of its doctors published a study – one of the first of its kind – about the effect of abortion bans in real life, the medical center didn’t issue a news release. The research, published in the American Journal of Gynecology, found that at two Texas hospitals, the abortion bans were “associated with significant maternal morbidity.”
CNN reached out to two oncologists at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, one of the largest cancer centers in the US, to ask them about their experiences treating pregnant patients, considering that Texas has had strict abortion limitations for more than a year.
Oncologists have expressed concern that abortion bans could hurt pregnant cancer patients. Pregnant women can’t receive certain cancer tests, and treatments that can harm a fetus, so if abortion is not an option, they sometimes have to delay lifesaving cancer care. As two breast cancer doctors wrote in August in The New England Journal of Medicine, abortion bans “will harm some of our patients” because sometimes, “we cannot offer complete or safe treatment to a pregnant person with a breast cancer diagnosis.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another beautiful day to say: There is no constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
😘
There's no Constitutional right to a Quadruple bypass either. But can you imagine politicians trying to tell you you can't have one if you and your dr. feel it's warranted? Imagine having to take an ambulance to NC to get one, to possibly save your life?
Anonymous wrote:Another beautiful day to say: There is no constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
😘
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another beautiful day to say: There is no constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
😘
I can’t begin to imagine what it must be like to be this insecure and insignificant. Just a hollow shell craving validation.
Anonymous wrote:Another beautiful day to say: There is no constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
😘
Anonymous wrote:Another beautiful day to say: There is no constitutional right to abortion in the United States.
😘
Anonymous wrote:A fetus with constitutional rights?
Rights to citizenship too?
Suppose a fetus is conceived in USA but born abroad?