Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser sadly just keeps saying the deal is done. Keeping the pressure on may help get other options for kids in the area and stop future similar backroom deals - but the odds of this reversing are slim to none.
DC backs out of "done deals" with schools and sports teams all the time.
The reason the original deal was done as an encumbrance on the deed and not a contract or MOU was that Maret had no confidence DC wouldn't try to back out once the field was built. DPR has done that to other partners.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hardy field access in exchange for sending the archaic urban school uniforms back to the Nineties? Now that would be the art of a deal.
You've been arguing about that for so long that uniforms are no longer archaic; they are back in vogue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser sadly just keeps saying the deal is done. Keeping the pressure on may help get other options for kids in the area and stop future similar backroom deals - but the odds of this reversing are slim to none.
DC backs out of "done deals" with schools and sports teams all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowser sadly just keeps saying the deal is done. Keeping the pressure on may help get other options for kids in the area and stop future similar backroom deals - but the odds of this reversing are slim to none.
DC backs out of "done deals" with schools and sports teams all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Hardy field access in exchange for sending the archaic urban school uniforms back to the Nineties? Now that would be the art of a deal.
Anonymous wrote:Bowser sadly just keeps saying the deal is done. Keeping the pressure on may help get other options for kids in the area and stop future similar backroom deals - but the odds of this reversing are slim to none.
Anonymous wrote:Bowser needs to go. She’s the old DC attitude that DC’s assets are hers to dole out as it pleases her. She is not serving the city well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those in the neighborhood, the Palisades Citizens' Association will be discussing Jelleff at their monthly Town Hall today (Wednesday) at the Palisades Rec Center from 7pm to 8:30pm. Councilmember Robert White will also be in attendance.
Resolution opposing the extension passed easily.
Not surprising because it’s a rotten deal for DC that only benefits Maret, but does the resolution have any effect to reverse the Maret deal?
Anonymous wrote:Bowser sadly just keeps saying the deal is done. Keeping the pressure on may help get other options for kids in the area and stop future similar backroom deals - but the odds of this reversing are slim to none.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those in the neighborhood, the Palisades Citizens' Association will be discussing Jelleff at their monthly Town Hall today (Wednesday) at the Palisades Rec Center from 7pm to 8:30pm. Councilmember Robert White will also be in attendance.
Resolution opposing the extension passed easily.
Not surprising because it’s a rotten deal for DC that only benefits Maret, but does the resolution have any effect to reverse the Maret deal?
It keeps the pressure on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For those in the neighborhood, the Palisades Citizens' Association will be discussing Jelleff at their monthly Town Hall today (Wednesday) at the Palisades Rec Center from 7pm to 8:30pm. Councilmember Robert White will also be in attendance.
Resolution opposing the extension passed easily.
Not surprising because it’s a rotten deal for DC that only benefits Maret, but does the resolution have any effect to reverse the Maret deal?