Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would an acceptable, face-saving exit even look like for Putin?
Unfortunately there isn’t one. Means that a whole country has no future now. I know it can’t be compared to what Ukraine is going through but I also feel sad for the kids of Russia who have been deprived of their future.
I don't believe this. I think this eventually ends with Putin forced out of power and a large part of Ukraine recognized as a sovereign nation with immediate acceptance into NATO and the EU - with a very, very heavy emphasis on eventually. I think we are in for a long haul, but with the West openly supporting an insurgency and maintaining sanctions it will happen eventually.
I do not believe the Russian military will facilitate the launch of nuclear weapons.
I think you are right. The sanctions should give the Russian population a reason to boot Putin. We’re going to make it so miserable there that they will have nothing to eat but beets and cucumbers. The next sanction will be to cancel visas and send Russians home. Putin will be (cough) done. The oligarchs are about to lose their yachts and condos this week.
The idea that Putin is ginning up a pretextural atomic bombing is scary. We see through it. Ukraine doesn’t have nuclear weapons and this is why we are trying to stay out of the fight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Some unconfirmed chatter on Twitter about Putin firing Valery Gerasimov, Russia’s Chief of the General Staff.
Is that a good thing in favor of calmer / sane next moves or a sign that Putin is spinning up and eliminating anyone who doesn’t agree with him?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What would an acceptable, face-saving exit even look like for Putin?
Unfortunately there isn’t one. Means that a whole country has no future now. I know it can’t be compared to what Ukraine is going through but I also feel sad for the kids of Russia who have been deprived of their future.
I don't believe this. I think this eventually ends with Putin forced out of power and a large part of Ukraine recognized as a sovereign nation with immediate acceptance into NATO and the EU - with a very, very heavy emphasis on eventually. I think we are in for a long haul, but with the West openly supporting an insurgency and maintaining sanctions it will happen eventually.
I do not believe the Russian military will facilitate the launch of nuclear weapons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/ng_ukraine/status/1497924614865002497?s=21
Azov fighters welcoming Chechen merc by dipping their bullets in lard first.
Based.
Why?
Probably religion, you know "consumption of pork." Although, I suspect Islam probably has exceptions for "ingestion" via ammunition.
Anonymous wrote:Some unconfirmed chatter on Twitter about Putin firing Valery Gerasimov, Russia’s Chief of the General Staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/ng_ukraine/status/1497924614865002497?s=21
Azov fighters welcoming Chechen merc by dipping their bullets in lard first.
Based.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://twitter.com/ng_ukraine/status/1497924614865002497?s=21
Azov fighters welcoming Chechen merc by dipping their bullets in lard first.
Based.
Why?
Anonymous wrote:Is Putin’s high alert a pretext for bombing other countries with nuclear weapons? This is the same schtick he used with Ukraine - that Ukraine was a threat and needed to be attacked to spare Russian lives. He’s essentially saying the same thing around the high alert. If the Russian military buys in, we are toast.
This is terrifying.
Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Is the new statement about nuclear arms different from the one this morning?
I thought they were already on high alert in Russia, but press is acting as if this is new?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/27/putin-nuclear-warning-requires-west-to-tread-extremely-carefully
Anonymous wrote:Why aren’t any of the 2A “Freedom Fighters” heading over to the Ukraine to help defend democracy?