Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
The high school boys are really taking over here, but back in grown up land Cosby plays Yorktown this week, which should provide some benchmark.
Well you are talking about us to be fair
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Stone Bridge could not buy a faceoff win last night- it's what killed them (and probably being cocky over their record beating up on crappy 4a LoCo teams).
Would agree with this! SB coaches need to learn to teach FO and wing play. The kid wasn't even lined up right.
However, Langley is very, very good at FO, but not that good. Almost wasn't fair.
Also, how many did #7 have? I mean after a few don't you adjust and lock him?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
The high school boys are really taking over here, but back in grown up land Cosby plays Yorktown this week, which should provide some benchmark.
Well you are talking about us to be fair
Talking about "Us"? Nobody is talking about the water boys like you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
The high school boys are really taking over here, but back in grown up land Cosby plays Yorktown this week, which should provide some benchmark.
Well you are talking about us to be fair
Talking about "Us"? Nobody is talking about the water boys like you
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This new kid Reid Poston transfer to robo, supposed to be good, plays attack
Yep heard that too, lethal left handed player also considering the fact he literally doesn't have a hand on his right arm. LOL
Was that the transfer from florida?? that kids a stud i watched him growing up so glad hes finally coming down to some real nova lax
Might have been, not sure where hes from but kids quite the player, kinda plays like that sunburn #7 kid from langley
Agree completely, Delirious McLean High moms are ignorant and refuse to accept this new prodigy. Kids gonna be a great. J.J. #2 level maybe??
JJ as in Jack Joy? wow what a pull, remember those days, I would only let that kid on the bermuda
I still remember the days this kid would peer pressure me to rip bag in big cafe... Kid was one hell of a stud
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This new kid Reid Poston transfer to robo, supposed to be good, plays attack
Yep heard that too, lethal left handed player also considering the fact he literally doesn't have a hand on his right arm. LOL
Was that the transfer from florida?? that kids a stud i watched him growing up so glad hes finally coming down to some real nova lax
Might have been, not sure where hes from but kids quite the player, kinda plays like that sunburn #7 kid from langley
Agree completely, Delirious McLean High moms are ignorant and refuse to accept this new prodigy. Kids gonna be a great. J.J. #2 level maybe??
JJ as in Jack Joy? wow what a pull, remember those days, I would only let that kid on the bermuda
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
The high school boys are really taking over here, but back in grown up land Cosby plays Yorktown this week, which should provide some benchmark.
Well you are talking about us to be fair
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
The high school boys are really taking over here, but back in grown up land Cosby plays Yorktown this week, which should provide some benchmark.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.
Yea, hard to have holes in your game when you’re literally playing the worst competition in Virginia. Also your logic makes no sense, that’s like saying if the Vikings beat up on the Titans, but played well, that they are better than the Seahawks. Anyone could beat the teams that Cosby played, they have yet to show this skill your talking about, and Cosby doesn’t deserve recognition until they play a team that is actually capable of passing and catching the ball.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Well I looked it up and they literally haven’t played anyone good at all, so I don’t understand what logic there is at even having them within top 10 in rankings
Me thinks you don't understand much than. It not necessarily who you play, its how you play and anyone who knows a sport, not just lacrosse, can tell you that.
There are two teams right now in VHSL that I would say have no to very minimal holes in their game. (I admit I have not seen Cosby play)
I would take those two teams, at this moment, against anyone else.