Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

You're asking the person to have blind faith in your utterances when you can't back it up with anything factually accurate of substance

I don't see where they’re either defending DC or showing blind faith allegiance to DC

I'm just seeing them calling out your anti DC talking points by asking you to provide real evidence that can pass scrutiny

There are PAGES of evidence. Read all the posts...it's all there.

There are PAGES of evidence that tariffs will bring back manufacturing jobs and lower prices

You just have to keep repeating it

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

You're asking the person to have blind faith in your utterances when you can't back it up with anything factually accurate of substance

I don't see where they’re either defending DC or showing blind faith allegiance to DC

I'm just seeing them calling out your anti DC talking points by asking you to provide real evidence that can pass scrutiny

There are PAGES of evidence. Read all the posts...it's all there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

You're asking the person to have blind faith in your utterances when you can't back it up with anything factually accurate of substance

I don't see where they’re either defending DC or showing blind faith allegiance to DC

I'm just seeing them calling out your anti DC talking points by asking you to provide real evidence that can pass scrutiny

There are PAGES of evidence. Read all the posts...it's all there.

Shut Up and go find a hobby will ya

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

You're asking the person to have blind faith in your utterances when you can't back it up with anything factually accurate of substance

I don't see where they’re either defending DC or showing blind faith allegiance to DC

I'm just seeing them calling out your anti DC talking points by asking you to provide real evidence that can pass scrutiny

There are PAGES of evidence. Read all the posts...it's all there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

You're asking the person to have blind faith in your utterances when you can't back it up with anything factually accurate of substance

I don't see where they’re either defending DC or showing blind faith allegiance to DC

I'm just seeing them calling out your anti DC talking points by asking you to provide real evidence that can pass scrutiny

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

It's obvious. You're the only one that doesn't see it. Blind faith in DCU, one of the crappiest organizations in pro sports is just a precarious position to be in. Don't envy you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

If being at DCU is a bad spot for a youth player, then what about the rest of players in the DMV?
Zero chance?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

If being at DCU is a bad spot for a youth player, then what about the rest of players in the DMV?
Zero chance?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Curious to know your role in all of this.

How would you know the situation of every individual kid who went through or is at the academy?
Because you would have to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they entered the academy.

Then you'd need to know their individual personal experiences there.

You would need to know their technical, psychological and soccer iq levels when they left.
For each individual.

How else can you be making blanket supposedly statements of fact regarding the development happening or not happening there?

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...

If being at DCU is a bad spot for a youth player, then what about the rest of players in the DMV?
Zero chance?

Anonymous wrote:And one of the worst first teams in the league. Meaning that it should be easier for an academy prospect to break through if they were developing them. But they aren't developing them. If you're at DCU, you're in a bad spot. That is just the reality. But you have to try and make the best of it. Which is most likely college soccer, without a scholarship. Just is what it is...