Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
I wonder if AP screwed up original plan by coming back to the house for the lunches?
Are you suggesting that AP screwed up JR's plan to randomly stab some woman he had never met in person?![]()
She just so happened to have recently been trained on how to shoot a gun! Perfect!
She also just so happened to have moved in to the dead woman's bed before it was even cold!
She's such a hero!
JR did not randomly stab anyone. AP screwed up BB's plot to kill the wife and blame the JR.
Then how would they have explained why they caught JR at the house in the first place? BB was supposedly out of the house as well. Coming back for the lunches makes it look like they just so happened to catch JR off guard. AP definitely was in on the plan. She never would have kept silent this long if she wasn't in on it from day 1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
Agree he is the likely stabber.
BB is not going to confess. Forensics can't easily prove who was the stabber. They can try with angles, heights, etc. Without testimony from the only other living person there, will be hard to make that case against him imho.
Will be interesting to see if Ring cameras caught shots and timing of cars arriving back, etc. Shame they did not have Alexa, etc., that has been helpful re: evidence in other cases. That the 4 year old was in the house takes the depravity to the next level for sure.
Why do you say that forensics can't easily prove who the stabber is, PP? Wouldn't/shouldn't there be fingerprints and possibly some blood from the stabber (they often cut themselves during stabbings)?
A knife is easily wiped. Any injury could be explained by his "struggle" trying to save his wife's life. The room and BB were awash in blood, remember his heroically trying to administer "aid."
JR could have been induced to bring a knife as a prop for the "scene" as one PP speculated. Curious what happened to the knife and if it was found? Since the shooting case against AP is separate, we don't know much about the stabbing evidence. Very difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that BB was the stabber without testimony, imo.
Not to trigger anyone, but I did click on one of the Winger links. That case was solved in part by testimony of a woman Winger had been having an affair with prior to the murder who came forward after years. Winger got too arrogant and was trying to civilly sue the employer of the patsy he tried to frame. No testimony yet re: the stabbing. BB and AP may have kept their plans tight. The whole sequence of 2 shots and 2 guns is odd, but, still not proof the knife was in BB's hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
Agree he is the likely stabber.
BB is not going to confess. Forensics can't easily prove who was the stabber. They can try with angles, heights, etc. Without testimony from the only other living person there, will be hard to make that case against him imho.
Will be interesting to see if Ring cameras caught shots and timing of cars arriving back, etc. Shame they did not have Alexa, etc., that has been helpful re: evidence in other cases. That the 4 year old was in the house takes the depravity to the next level for sure.
Why do you say that forensics can't easily prove who the stabber is, PP? Wouldn't/shouldn't there be fingerprints and possibly some blood from the stabber (they often cut themselves during stabbings)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
Agree he is the likely stabber.
BB is not going to confess. Forensics can't easily prove who was the stabber. They can try with angles, heights, etc. Without testimony from the only other living person there, will be hard to make that case against him imho.
Will be interesting to see if Ring cameras caught shots and timing of cars arriving back, etc. Shame they did not have Alexa, etc., that has been helpful re: evidence in other cases. That the 4 year old was in the house takes the depravity to the next level for sure.
Anonymous wrote:
If he is charged with shooting JR he can claim self defense, defense of wife, etc. I think they are likely right about it being a ruse and lure for a patsy but not sure how they get from that to probable cause re: him stabbing. Sounded like the EMT did not see the knife in the excellent reporting from attendees yesterday. Wonder what happened to it? Wonder if BB's leg "injury" was a slash? Even that could be explained in his "story
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I could see the plan being for each to take a shot. BB was more likely to be able to make a non instant kill shot and did, but JR, a tall guy who was martial arts trained, was then incapacitated and blinded. AP was trained to shoot for the torso. Sounds like either shot could have been grounds for homicide charges? I fear he may skate on the stabbing, hard to prove without testimony.
They are going to have to offer AP a killer of a plea deal.
Anonymous wrote:I could see the plan being for each to take a shot. BB was more likely to be able to make a non instant kill shot and did, but JR, a tall guy who was martial arts trained, was then incapacitated and blinded. AP was trained to shoot for the torso. Sounds like either shot could have been grounds for homicide charges? I fear he may skate on the stabbing, hard to prove without testimony.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
I wonder if AP screwed up original plan by coming back to the house for the lunches?
No - that was definitely part of the OG plan. They needed a ruse for why they would have "caught" JR in action.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.
I wonder if AP screwed up original plan by coming back to the house for the lunches?
Are you suggesting that AP screwed up JR's plan to randomly stab some woman he had never met in person?![]()
She just so happened to have recently been trained on how to shoot a gun! Perfect!
She also just so happened to have moved in to the dead woman's bed before it was even cold!
She's such a hero!
JR did not randomly stab anyone. AP screwed up BB's plot to kill the wife and blame the JR.
Then how would they have explained why they caught JR at the house in the first place? BB was supposedly out of the house as well. Coming back for the lunches makes it look like they just so happened to catch JR off guard. AP definitely was in on the plan. She never would have kept silent this long if she wasn't in on it from day 1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What am I missing here- if BB fires the first shot, why on earth would he ask the AP to get another gun? Why wouldn’t he, the trained LE, fire the second? If in a juror, what possible reasoning is there for that?
Yep.
2 guns vs 1 knife (if you buy the bs story that JR was the one who actually stabbed CB)
Makes no sense. Even if they try to argue that JR was still alive and trying to fight back. A trained cop (BB) would have just shot him again.
Someone screwed up the original plan. I think AP was supposed to have been the only shooter but choked.
BB was clearly the one that stabbed CB. That takes a certain level of dedication to be able to pull off.