Anonymous wrote:He doesn’t make you pay for anyone but yourselves it seems like. Not sure how this is an issue.

I don't get why you are upset. Are you just looking for a hand out and are mad he's not doing it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blue collar boomers assume all physicians are very wealthy. FIL sees his SIL as having deep pockets and being blue collar expects the deep pocket guy to pay. It’s a scarcity mindset. Even though FIL has unexpectedly made a lot of money, he doesn’t want to share it and he wants others to give him more money. Generational wealth building is something very foreign to him. FIL would probably also love to get his fingers into some of the OPs parents’ money.

FIL may also lose his money or not be as solidly wealthy as he lets on. If he is a tradesman who became a contractor, he could very well blow up at some point. Real estate developers who can come from blue or white collar backgrounds often skate between being worth millions and being bankrupt. If he’s built a successful plumbing or HVAC company and sells to PE he could make a lot but then invests it poorly with a developer friend where he could lose it.

OP is wealthy.

So is FIL.

Everyone is mocking the wife's usless degree as a probable justification for why her father wants her to pay the money back but did OP even say what the degree was? Because relative to his career as a physician I'm sure everything seems low paying.

Regardless of what the undergrad degree is in, by OP's admission, she is going to get a masters in an area that is low pay. So, she is making one bad decision after another knowing that she would not be able to pay her father back like she promised she would.

OP is an elitist who thinks how he uses his wealth is the right way (look at me, aren't I great for helping my extended family), and the FIL is a tightwad a$$ (who made his wealth rather than inherited it) for expecting his daughter to pay back money she agreed to.

OP's wife is kind of an idiot and a leech for expecting the men in her life to keep subsidizing her so she can do whatever she wants. If she weren't married to a rich man, how would she pay back the loan and get a masters in a low paying field?

FIL is a bit harsh, but he built his wealth by himself and knows how hard it is to make that money. IMO, him letting his daughter pay back the loan with no interest and no maturity date signals to me that this isn't about money but about teaching his adult daughter the value of money and the consequences of her choices. Seems to me that she has yet to learn that lesson.

As for the expensive dinners and trips, OP can say no, but why should FIL subsidize OP's choice in using his wealth to help his extended family members (while kind), and then OP turns around and says to the FIL that they will no longer be paying the debt owed.

OP here. I am not providing financial help to my family. They do not need it. I have obtained prestigious research internships and gotten their names on publications for when they apply to medical school. I also help elderly family members with managing their affairs - I work 0.8 FTE to make time for this.

I don’t consider my wife’s degree useless. I encouraged her to go back school and if she wants to stay at home after school I am happy with that as well.

Ultimately, I find my FIL’s stinginess embarrassing. He has a mid eight figure net worth and is still a poor tipper. He will gobble up all the bread at the table. In my family we are generous with our time, money, and other resources. FIL has the opposite mindset. If he were less fortunate I would happily pay for his dinner and vacation. I paid for the last semester of college for a friend who is in a tough spot so I consider myself very charitable. But, a wealthy old man who is stingy with their own family and the less fortunate will never receive money from me.

Meh, I bet you’re intimidated by him. He’s probably put you in your place a few times, and you’re feeling bitter and resentful. Plus it’s your wife’s father and we women always have a soft spot for our dads. It may be hard for you to measure up! You aren’t a self made man and that’s got to be emasculating to a certain degree. Weather you admit it or not.

Are you sure FIL is serious? I cannot imagine some dad in his 60s-70s truly wanting his daughter to pay him back when that money could help her own family. My dad would be mortified at the idea, and we are middle class.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There's something off with you. This is not how normal people think or talk.

That much is clear. I suspect OP is high-functioning autistic and just does not understand how other people can live by different values.

OP should pay his fair share of expenses when he spends time with in-laws. If the suggested trips are too expensive, OP can politely decline and tell them they're too expensive. The whole "my parents are subsidizing my in-laws" premise doesn't hold up. OP's family rules apply only when OP is interacting with his own family. When he's interacting with the outside world (including in-laws), he needs to pay his own way. Personally, this is easy for me to understand. I don't know why OP has such a hard time with it, but that's why I suspect he's on the spectrum - he's displaying a highly recognizable rigid mentality that is associated with autism.

The thing about arguments by people on the spectrum is that they are usually logical and rational. OP's family is in effect subsidizing his rich in-laws if OP has to pay back his nonworking wife's student loan, especially if OP is relying on family money to live during his residency, which it kind of sounds like may be the case. Now, he has already shut down the "loan" repayment nonsense, and rightfully so.

OP is all about subsidizing people, he calls it "paying forward" but it's so odd how these terribly rich, successful, prosperous people need so much help. It's like a hoarding mentality. They are terrified they will be poor again.

Anonymous wrote:So all the money goes to the leeching elders on your side? And your wife’s debts get ignored? Great family values.

Yep…OP is TA.

I haven't read all the posts, but I'm am with you OP. If they didn't want to pay for college so be it, though strange for a wealthy person, but you at least guide your kid toward scholarships and state school or community college first. They sound cheap and super strange with money.

My father made a lot and my parents lived well. They insisted I must go to any ivy, when I was perfectly happy to go to state school. Then no thank you was enough for my mother-guilt trips constantly over the cost. She used to make all sorts of offers like if I didn't have a wedding, we'd get the money to use as we please. We didn't have a wedding and didn't get the money. I could write for pages about all the dances with money. I basically didn't engage with her at all when it came to money-your money-your choice but stop dangling carrots. We also stopped doing anything with her that involves money. She would then try to make me jealous telling me the expensive financial gifts she gave to others and I had to make it clear again-your money your choice, but I will not engage with this.

Over the years we have occasionally had friends who were strange with money. One couple would order the most expensive dishes and then drink like fish. We are on a budget and order low price and only drink water. Of course they would want to split 50-50 and then they wanted to be cheap for the tip so ended up paying 75% of the tip so the server got more money. We just won't do dinner with them. We'll meet up for a free outdoor concert or something like that. It works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There's something off with you. This is not how normal people think or talk.

That much is clear. I suspect OP is high-functioning autistic and just does not understand how other people can live by different values.

OP should pay his fair share of expenses when he spends time with in-laws. If the suggested trips are too expensive, OP can politely decline and tell them they're too expensive. The whole "my parents are subsidizing my in-laws" premise doesn't hold up. OP's family rules apply only when OP is interacting with his own family. When he's interacting with the outside world (including in-laws), he needs to pay his own way. Personally, this is easy for me to understand. I don't know why OP has such a hard time with it, but that's why I suspect he's on the spectrum - he's displaying a highly recognizable rigid mentality that is associated with autism.

The thing about arguments by people on the spectrum is that they are usually logical and rational. OP's family is in effect subsidizing his rich in-laws if OP has to pay back his nonworking wife's student loan, especially if OP is relying on family money to live during his residency, which it kind of sounds like may be the case. Now, he has already shut down the "loan" repayment nonsense, and rightfully so.

PP you replied to. The loan thing was ridic, so I agree that he was right to put his foot down. But for current expenses, I think his FIL is right to not pay for the entire family group when they go on vacation. OP shouldn't complain about having to pay for his share of restaurant meals and hotel rooms and such.

OP is going to be a nightmare in divorce court. Wow.

In a perfect world, two educated individuals would have discussed finances and worked this out before marriage. Unless it was a surprise elopement, most parents would have wanted to know about student loan debt of prospective son or daughter-in-law. Especially parents still subsidizing an adult child. In my experience.

I'm leaning toward bot, but enjoying the thread.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
There's something off with you. This is not how normal people think or talk.

That much is clear. I suspect OP is high-functioning autistic and just does not understand how other people can live by different values.

OP should pay his fair share of expenses when he spends time with in-laws. If the suggested trips are too expensive, OP can politely decline and tell them they're too expensive. The whole "my parents are subsidizing my in-laws" premise doesn't hold up. OP's family rules apply only when OP is interacting with his own family. When he's interacting with the outside world (including in-laws), he needs to pay his own way. Personally, this is easy for me to understand. I don't know why OP has such a hard time with it, but that's why I suspect he's on the spectrum - he's displaying a highly recognizable rigid mentality that is associated with autism.

The thing about arguments by people on the spectrum is that they are usually logical and rational. OP's family is in effect subsidizing his rich in-laws if OP has to pay back his nonworking wife's student loan, especially if OP is relying on family money to live during his residency, which it kind of sounds like may be the case. Now, he has already shut down the "loan" repayment nonsense, and rightfully so.

Anonymous wrote:
There's something off with you. This is not how normal people think or talk.

That much is clear. I suspect OP is high-functioning autistic and just does not understand how other people can live by different values.

OP should pay his fair share of expenses when he spends time with in-laws. If the suggested trips are too expensive, OP can politely decline and tell them they're too expensive. The whole "my parents are subsidizing my in-laws" premise doesn't hold up. OP's family rules apply only when OP is interacting with his own family. When he's interacting with the outside world (including in-laws), he needs to pay his own way. Personally, this is easy for me to understand. I don't know why OP has such a hard time with it, but that's why I suspect he's on the spectrum - he's displaying a highly recognizable rigid mentality that is associated with autism.

Anonymous wrote:Her loans are her responsibility. Those need to be on hold until she starts working.

For dining and travel, just accept what works for you.

Overall, be generous but don't feel obligated to go out of your comfort zone.

You and your FIL sound like more alike than you and your family.

Any undocumented quasi-agreements made between an 18-year-old and her parents are not a "loan". Its not enforceable.

Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe anyone can possibly agree with OP. It’s clear that the wife was paying her father back because there previously were payments to be stopped. However, OP and his wife decided she would stop having an income, which their decision to make, but OP refused to accept one of the results of that decision which is that he would need to foot all of his wife’s bills, which includes the one to her parents, whether he likes it or not. Instead he decided her father didn’t deserve to be paid back, so he just wouldn’t. His FIL is not choosing not to cut off his daughter over this but is upset.

OP sounds like a physician with a god complex who enjoys having his wife dependent on him so he can call the shots and force his own agenda based on how he views her family. He clearly enjoys feeling like a benefactor and still doesn’t understand that it’s easy to be generous when you have a ton of money and resources and have never had to struggle.

The father in law sounds like an interesting person who has done a lot with very little. I am not going to make the same decisions but I have a lot of respect for someone who likely really hustled and sacrificed in a way OP will probably never understand.

The FIL sucks if he has a mid-8-figure income and wants his SIL to pay back his daughter's "loan" for college that was never even documented. I don't respect that at all. My father is similar to OP's FIL, and even though he never went to college, he paid for all of our education - law school, medical school, pilot training - we pretty much got a blank check if it was in furtherance of our path toward self-sufficiency. Now we cover our own expenses, but education? Of course, he paid.

One issue, if you two decide, she stays home to raise kids then guess you pay her loans as you are benefiting from unpaid labor and she is missing out on paying back what she promised to pay back to him.

Her loans are her responsibility. Those need to be on hold until she starts working.

For dining and travel, just accept what works for you.

Overall, be generous but don't feel obligated to go out of your comfort zone.

You and your FIL sound like more alike than you and your family.