Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Wow, 9 months. Longest sentence to date.

It's gonna be ugly for Aunt Becky

I’m thinking 15 months minimum for her AND for her husband.

This dude plead guilty to less charges while Aunt Becky has 4 including federal wire fraud on her plate.

What's the status of Aunt Becky's case? Can't wait to see that play out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Wow, 9 months. Longest sentence to date.

It's gonna be ugly for Aunt Becky

I’m thinking 15 months minimum for her AND for her husband.

This dude plead guilty to less charges while Aunt Becky has 4 including federal wire fraud on her plate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Wow, 9 months. Longest sentence to date.

It's gonna be ugly for Aunt Becky

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Love how they say stuff like, “I unfairly .. tipped the scales in favor of my children over others" when they mean, "I kicked four qualified kids out of schools that could have been their dream schools that they'd worked their whole lives for, that could have really made a big difference to their futures, so my entitled and unqualified bunch could be there instead".

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Wow, 9 months. Longest sentence to date.

Anonymous wrote:next person in line to be sentenced:

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-02-07/douglas-hodge-ex-pimco-chief-sentenced-to-in-admissions-scandal?fbclid=IwAR2hKoZG1-dYRRhpUmifNmrfNY26SoMUNWc710Zq5fhQrz-TcRcz4C4n-_o

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Felicity Huffman will do ZERO days in jail -- Taking a plea early will be rewarded...

HA. She's been sentenced to jail time. And she had the least amount in the scandal. Those other parents, and especially Loughlin -- are looking at half a year to years in jail.

Fourteen days. Huffman was wise to be humble and take full responsibility for her bad choices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Felicity Huffman will do ZERO days in jail -- Taking a plea early will be rewarded...

HA. She's been sentenced to jail time. And she had the least amount in the scandal. Those other parents, and especially Loughlin -- are looking at half a year to years in jail.

Anonymous wrote:Felicity Huffman will do ZERO days in jail -- Taking a plea early will be rewarded...

Anonymous wrote: I'm reading the actual prosecutions are not going well. Difficult for judges and juries to understand what mail fraud, money-laundering etc. have to do with bribing college coaches. Problem is, of course, that paying big money to get into college is legal. Te defendants just chose to go through the side door rather than the front door.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Lori Loughlin Wants to ‘Expose’ USC’s Admission Practices Amid College Scam

And stuff about USC and her and her husband having the same law firm except the article was kinda confusing in the particulars and implications

http://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/celebrity/lori-loughlin-wants-to-expose-usc-s-admission-practices-amid-college-scam/ar-AACxteZ?ocid=ientp

I am not a lawyer. As a layman, the way I understand the link, Lori Loughlin has information about a family that made a substantial donation to USC and got their son/daughter offered admission - akin to Harvard's development case (admission offer in exchange for a large sum of donation). If in future USC files a civil suit against Lori Loughlin and her husband for bringing about bad reputation to USC, she plans to conduct extensive discovery process and make public how USC trades admission offers for large donations.

I truly hope USC and Lori Loughlin will fight it out in the civil court so that admission offer for large donations will become tpxic and all universities will abandon such an abhorent practice. I also hope legacy admissions will also be a thing of the past - Harvard already has such a bad reputation through it's own law suit.

Harvard has

[b]Hoping big donors stop donating to colleges[/b]. So that maybe your kid has a tiny slice higher chance to get in, but poor kids have a more difficult time paying. Nice goal.

That is the falsehood being spread and gullible people like you believe. Harvard's endowment fund was $39.2 billions at the end of the fiscal year 2018 (June 30, 2018). Harvard uses part of its earnings from only two of its 13000 different funds (albeit two largest funds) to support faculty and students.

https://www.harvard.edu/about-harvard/harvard-glance/endowment

https://www.harvardmagazine.com/endowment-18

Do you think the endowment came from the endowment elves?

Or from big donors?

If that is how you justify wealthy people buying Harvard admission, and Harvard selling admission to wealthy people, let me give you some other real-life scenarios and you think about them if you can justify/tolerate:
1. In some countries a wealthy killer can pay money (called blood money) to a victim's family and with the consent of that family avoid conviction from courts.
2. What if a State govt or Federal govt in the US institutes "pay to play" in awarding govt contracts and uses the money given to fund some public works projects.

In short, the end doesn't justify the means.

Utter imbecile.

No, the PP offering scenarios is absolutely correct. The utter imbecile is the PP who just calls names because he can't actually refute the PP offering scenarios.