Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Where do you get this "duffel bags and backpacks full of cash" bullshit? There is absolutely ZERO in introduced evidence or testimony to support this. Did she have a few k in cash at her home? Sure. And it was probably less than $10k based on the testimony she gave. And so what? Since when is that some kind of crime? I could name a dozen or more people who probably have more than that in their till or wallet at any given time, whether contractors going to buy materials or restauranteurs et cetera and those numbers will easily scale out to the millions nationally. If it's some kind of big crime then why aren't we focusing on the commercials to buy gold bullion that come on conservative talk radio literally every 5 minutes? And if you don't know what I'm talking about here then maybe you need to step away from this conversation completely because you are definitely and unequivocably clueless on the subject.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Evidently, Nathan Wade is a fan of cash too. He testified that he has clients who pay his law firm in cash all the time.
Really?
And, these two are in charge of one of the most high profile cases ever.
This would be hilarious if it weren't so serious.

Is using cash illegal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

You have to be kidding.

She brought this on herself by making bad decisions.

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

Anonymous wrote:Fani was very entertaining yesterday. Signing those forms that she didn’t receive any gifts from prohibited sources such as one of the DA’s office contract employees and not understanding what gifts are was quite the act. Judge is giving her plenty of rope that she is using very effectively.

Anonymous wrote:Fani was very entertaining yesterday. Signing those forms that she didn’t receive any gifts from prohibited sources such as one of the DA’s office contract employees and not understanding what gifts are was quite the act. Judge is giving her plenty of rope that she is using very effectively.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid situation is shameful.

It's obvious that Trump is the criminal here. How is this getting turned around. No one is focusing on the real issues. Just some kind of stupid kangaroo court.

Of course it is. None of this makes Trump's criminality go away. This is entirely "shoot the messenger" circus.

I think this needs to be reiterated every 5 posts or so.

Anonymous wrote:Wow this whole case is going to be thrown out because of the corrupt da

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid situation is shameful.

It's obvious that Trump is the criminal here. How is this getting turned around. No one is focusing on the real issues. Just some kind of stupid kangaroo court.

Of course it is. None of this makes Trump's criminality go away. This is entirely "shoot the messenger" circus.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I’m sorry but I see no connection between her ability to do an excellent job on this case and her private relationship with a member of her team.

If the relationship is consensual, I see no problem with it. I’ve always thought this whenever government work place relationships crop up, regardless of whether it’s a democrat or republican held up to public shame.

It’s ridiculous how small-minded people get whenever sex is involved.

Your mistress steering you millions of public dollars during pillow talk is no big deal? Banging each other on taxpayer and business credit card funded trips is no big deal? Claiming she reimbursed him with sacks of cash for every trip and he omitted those expenses from his tax returns? Come on. These are not serious or ethical people. They are power drunk dunces busted red handed.

If I pay for tickets for a trip and it costs $5,000 and the person going on a trip with me repays me the $2,500 for their portion in cash, one or both of us have to claim that on our taxes? Is that what you’re saying? I’m not an accountant, but I haven’t received a gift or earned money.

Nobody carries around thousands of dollars in cash. Give me a break. And nobody as corrupt and stupid as these nitwits is going back through their credit card “BUSINESS” expenses during tax season and subtracts the “cash” their mistress gave them.

I know several people who do and they have legitimate businesses. You are the nitwit.

Legitimate businesses and mistresses? Do they carry their thousands of dollars in cash in duffel bags or backpacks?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watching three white attorneys grill two African Americans about their sex life and relationship sure felt like a lynching.

+1 Plus everyone knows that Wade had (I assume prostate) cancer, which doesn’t seem like it was public knowledge, and there will be lines outside Willis’s house of burglars trying to get that cash.