Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?
Do we get to vote on who our fathers are? I thought we were voting for the presidential/vice presidential ticket?
It’s an interesting thought experiment, along the lines of - JD, Walz, or Bear?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well let’s see, for decades they were both teachers who don’t make much money. They needed IVF to have their kids, and one of them has a learning disability. Sent both kids to college. He was in Congress where you need to maintain a place to stay here as well as your residence. Now he’s the Governor. Not sure they really ever had a lot of extra money. But I’m sure we’ll find out more when we see their tax returns.
Yeah this sounds like most people I know. Other poster is in a sweet bubble.
I’m a bit worried about his money management skills, honestly. Time will tell, I guess.
This isn’t helping the socialist/commie accusations. Not owning a home at 60+ as a current governor is embarrassing. He was former military so there’s no excuse to not owning a home.
He’s cheap
DP. He sold his home. He is the real deal—a public servant, a leader, a National Guardsman, and someone who cares about people. That money and property ownership may not matter that much to him is admirable. Having said that, if and when he wants to write a book or whatever, he will quickly have more money than pretty much anyone posting here. Tim Walz will be vp and, eventually, president. He will take this country to a better place.
Ok but my money better matter to this loony socialist. When I am 60, I don’t want to be broke like he is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?
Exactly.
Exactly WRONG. The idiocy from the right was that THEY were claiming via leaders of their clown car that simply putting sanitary napkins in bathrooms would ENCOURAGE transition. In other words, the usual stupidity from the right-wing. A boy who is hetero will see the dispenser and just decide he wants to become a woman.
So per usual, the reich-wing tries to engage in hysterics and hyperbole when 99.9% of the ones using the dispenser are GIRLS and it was meant for girls, but because teh right has NOTHING to offer the American people but their bile, they want to focus on a baker's dozen of trans kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?
Do we get to vote on who our fathers are? I thought we were voting for the presidential/vice presidential ticket?
Anonymous wrote:Who would you rather have as a father - JD (shut the hell up) Vance or Tim Walz?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?
Exactly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well let’s see, for decades they were both teachers who don’t make much money. They needed IVF to have their kids, and one of them has a learning disability. Sent both kids to college. He was in Congress where you need to maintain a place to stay here as well as your residence. Now he’s the Governor. Not sure they really ever had a lot of extra money. But I’m sure we’ll find out more when we see their tax returns.
Yeah this sounds like most people I know. Other poster is in a sweet bubble.
I’m a bit worried about his money management skills, honestly. Time will tell, I guess.
This isn’t helping the socialist/commie accusations. Not owning a home at 60+ as a current governor is embarrassing. He was former military so there’s no excuse to not owning a home.
He’s cheap
DP. He sold his home. He is the real deal—a public servant, a leader, a National Guardsman, and someone who cares about people. That money and property ownership may not matter that much to him is admirable. Having said that, if and when he wants to write a book or whatever, he will quickly have more money than pretty much anyone posting here. Tim Walz will be vp and, eventually, president. He will take this country to a better place.
Ok but my money better matter to this loony socialist. When I am 60, I don’t want to be broke like he is.
Or like Trump who has to use his political funds to pay his legal bills because he’s BROKE?
I’d rather be Trump broke than Walz broke
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
Um... no one has mocked him for providing girls with sanitary products. The point is, why is he also providing BOYS with the same sanitary products??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.
I think it’s that he’s putting menstrual products in the boys’ room that’s an issue, not free menstrual products. Doesn’t anyone have common sense now?
Anonymous wrote:There are gains that can be excluded from income for personal residences. Also you can put money into teacher pension plans. So if he had money he probably put it there.
Anonymous wrote:
Imagine thinking that mocking a governor who is providing feminine hygiene products for (low income) students so they don't have the extra burden of blood-stained clothing, is some sort of "own"?
Who in the hell could support such an insidious, selfish, hateful political party as the GOP? And I don't even care if you hate the Dems, but the GOP is just scummy.