Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:reading all the details on project 2025's website is absolutely terrifying.
trump & vance must be defeated!
And that’s what they felt empowered to write down. Imagine how insane the rest of their plans are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by why they put all this out there in the first place. Why tie an anchor around the neck of the guy that can help execute your plans?
They're Trump supporters. They think all patriotic Americans agree with them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by why they put all this out there in the first place. Why tie an anchor around the neck of the guy that can help execute your plans?
Another unforced error amongst many.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Depends on the job. A Washington bureaucrat could work until they are 90 unless they first die of boredom.
A road worker a Washington bureaucracy is supposed to help might have to retire at 62 because of body damage because OSHA laws are not enforced by the bureaucracy.
So they want people to work longer, but what happens when an elderly employee is no longer able to function at the level they were — be it due to early dementia, physical issues, etc? They (Project 2025) on one hand want to fire lower-performing employees (at least in the federal government), but they also want people to work longer. You can’t have it both ways.
Then the old employees retire and the low performing employees are fired.
Would you want it any other way?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Depends on the job. A Washington bureaucrat could work until they are 90 unless they first die of boredom.
A road worker a Washington bureaucracy is supposed to help might have to retire at 62 because of body damage because OSHA laws are not enforced by the bureaucracy.
So they want people to work longer, but what happens when an elderly employee is no longer able to function at the level they were — be it due to early dementia, physical issues, etc? They (Project 2025) on one hand want to fire lower-performing employees (at least in the federal government), but they also want people to work longer. You can’t have it both ways.
Then the old employees retire and the low performing employees are fired.
Would you want it any other way?
Anonymous wrote:reading all the details on project 2025's website is absolutely terrifying.
trump & vance must be defeated!
Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by why they put all this out there in the first place. Why tie an anchor around the neck of the guy that can help execute your plans?
Anonymous wrote:I'm really puzzled by why they put all this out there in the first place. Why tie an anchor around the neck of the guy that can help execute your plans?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Depends on the job. A Washington bureaucrat could work until they are 90 unless they first die of boredom.
A road worker a Washington bureaucracy is supposed to help might have to retire at 62 because of body damage because OSHA laws are not enforced by the bureaucracy.
So they want people to work longer, but what happens when an elderly employee is no longer able to function at the level they were — be it due to early dementia, physical issues, etc? They (Project 2025) on one hand want to fire lower-performing employees (at least in the federal government), but they also want people to work longer. You can’t have it both ways.
Anonymous wrote:reading all the details on project 2025's website is absolutely terrifying.
trump & vance must be defeated!