Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
That’s absurd. Do you know who cares about parking? Hardy’s neighbors. Do you think they would allow the school to *not* have parking?!
You know who else cares about parking? The students, because the best available teachers to be interested in jobs at Hardy, not just the few candidates who happen to live within walking distance or along the Wisconsin Ave bus routes.
Do you even know how much parking Hardy has? Not very much.
Do you know how much parking Maret has? About 4 times as much as Hardy.
Do you know who has a site that can accommodate far more parking and athletic space than currently? Maret and their 7 acres. But they would rather squat on public resources and deprive less privileged kids than use their political capital and their strong ‘community’ ethos to work with their neighbors to solve their needs with their own land (like every other independent school does, except Lab).
You do realize that DC-resident Maret parents are paying twice for education, don’t you? Once for Maret tuition and assessments and then in the substantial annual income, property as sales taxes that go to support DCPS. It a more just world, private school parents would get a tax rebate to reflect the fact that they are saving the public school system substantial money rather than using public school resources. And yes, Maret kids who live in the Hardy zone no doubt open up student placed at Hardy for kids who otherwise would be stuck with a more s...hole local middle school — and so their parents then get a chance to whine about the shocking social justice inequity that Maret gets a couple of practice hours in exchange for funding capital improvements to a field.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
That’s absurd. Do you know who cares about parking? Hardy’s neighbors. Do you think they would allow the school to *not* have parking?!
You know who else cares about parking? The students, because the best available teachers to be interested in jobs at Hardy, not just the few candidates who happen to live within walking distance or along the Wisconsin Ave bus routes.
Do you even know how much parking Hardy has? Not very much.
Do you know how much parking Maret has? About 4 times as much as Hardy.
Do you know who has a site that can accommodate far more parking and athletic space than currently? Maret and their 7 acres. But they would rather squat on public resources and deprive less privileged kids than use their political capital and their strong ‘community’ ethos to work with their neighbors to solve their needs with their own land (like every other independent school does, except Lab).
Lots of public schools don’t offer parking for teachers. Are you saying that they aren’t getting the best teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
That’s absurd. Do you know who cares about parking? Hardy’s neighbors. Do you think they would allow the school to *not* have parking?!
You know who else cares about parking? The students, because the best available teachers to be interested in jobs at Hardy, not just the few candidates who happen to live within walking distance or along the Wisconsin Ave bus routes.
Do you even know how much parking Hardy has? Not very much.
Do you know how much parking Maret has? About 4 times as much as Hardy.
Do you know who has a site that can accommodate far more parking and athletic space than currently? Maret and their 7 acres. But they would rather squat on public resources and deprive less privileged kids than use their political capital and their strong ‘community’ ethos to work with their neighbors to solve their needs with their own land (like every other independent school does, except Lab).
Anonymous wrote:Shouldn’t Hardy have the right to use the nearby DCPS field (Ellington field). Why is Hardy barred from it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
That’s absurd. Do you know who cares about parking? Hardy’s neighbors. Do you think they would allow the school to *not* have parking?!
You know who else cares about parking? The students, because the best available teachers to be interested in jobs at Hardy, not just the few candidates who happen to live within walking distance or along the Wisconsin Ave bus routes.
Do you even know how much parking Hardy has? Not very much.
Do you know how much parking Maret has? About 4 times as much as Hardy.
Do you know who has a site that can accommodate far more parking and athletic space than currently? Maret and their 7 acres. But they would rather squat on public resources and deprive less privileged kids than use their political capital and their strong ‘community’ ethos to work with their neighbors to solve their needs with their own land (like every other independent school does, except Lab).
Lots of public schools don’t offer parking for teachers. Are you saying that they aren’t getting the best teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
That’s absurd. Do you know who cares about parking? Hardy’s neighbors. Do you think they would allow the school to *not* have parking?!
You know who else cares about parking? The students, because the best available teachers to be interested in jobs at Hardy, not just the few candidates who happen to live within walking distance or along the Wisconsin Ave bus routes.
Do you even know how much parking Hardy has? Not very much.
Do you know how much parking Maret has? About 4 times as much as Hardy.
Do you know who has a site that can accommodate far more parking and athletic space than currently? Maret and their 7 acres. But they would rather squat on public resources and deprive less privileged kids than use their political capital and their strong ‘community’ ethos to work with their neighbors to solve their needs with their own land (like every other independent school does, except Lab).
Anonymous wrote:Typical entitled DC government bureaucrats. It’s all about their perks and other free stuff they can get. It’s seldom about the people, the kids, the customers. Putting parking ahead of play-space is selfish and disgusting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anybody have any updates, other than Bowser saying she supports this deal? Is there a plan on how to proceed?
I'm going to piggyback on this. What can the Council do? Can the Council unilaterally rescind the deal?
If so, let's try to game this out:
Definitely oppose Maret deal: Silverman, Cheh, Robert White
Lean oppose: Trayvon White, Gray
Unknown views: Mendelsohn, Bonds, Grosso, Nadeau, McDuffie, Allen,
Lean support: Todd (he is Bowser's lackey)
Definitely support Maret deal: Evans
I think the Council would have momentum to take action on this deal. It would be quicker than going through the courts.
You need to go look at a map. That parking lot couldnt even fit a raquetball court. It's also beside the point.
I think Bowser killed momentum on Kojo. Only so many fights the council is willing to pick. Maret — this is the last public good you’ll get from DC taxpayers. Everyone is watching you now. Start your fundraising if you need more stuff.
Oh, and Hardy... get rid of the on-site staff parking and give it to the kids for recreational needs. So selfish for staff to hoard this scarce resource. Take the Metro or bus like the rest of us or pay for commercial parking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anybody have any updates, other than Bowser saying she supports this deal? Is there a plan on how to proceed?
I'm going to piggyback on this. What can the Council do? Can the Council unilaterally rescind the deal?
If so, let's try to game this out:
Definitely oppose Maret deal: Silverman, Cheh, Robert White
Lean oppose: Trayvon White, Gray
Unknown views: Mendelsohn, Bonds, Grosso, Nadeau, McDuffie, Allen,
Lean support: Todd (he is Bowser's lackey)
Definitely support Maret deal: Evans
I think the Council would have momentum to take action on this deal. It would be quicker than going through the courts.
I think Bowser killed momentum on Kojo. Only so many fights the council is willing to pick. Maret — this is the last public good you’ll get from DC taxpayers. Everyone is watching you now. Start your fundraising if you need more stuff.
Oh, and Hardy... get rid of the on-site staff parking and give it to the kids for recreational needs. So selfish for staff to hoard this scarce resource. Take the Metro or bus like the rest of us or pay for commercial parking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anybody have any updates, other than Bowser saying she supports this deal? Is there a plan on how to proceed?
I'm going to piggyback on this. What can the Council do? Can the Council unilaterally rescind the deal?
If so, let's try to game this out:
Definitely oppose Maret deal: Silverman, Cheh, Robert White
Lean oppose: Trayvon White, Gray
Unknown views: Mendelsohn, Bonds, Grosso, Nadeau, McDuffie, Allen,
Lean support: Todd (he is Bowser's lackey)
Definitely support Maret deal: Evans
I think the Council would have momentum to take action on this deal. It would be quicker than going through the courts.
I think Bowser killed momentum on Kojo. Only so many fights the council is willing to pick. Maret — this is the last public good you’ll get from DC taxpayers. Everyone is watching you now. Start your fundraising if you need more stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Bowser’s kid has a guaranteed scholarship spot at Maret. The rowing coach vouches for the family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anybody have any updates, other than Bowser saying she supports this deal? Is there a plan on how to proceed?
I'm going to piggyback on this. What can the Council do? Can the Council unilaterally rescind the deal?
If so, let's try to game this out:
Definitely oppose Maret deal: Silverman, Cheh, Robert White
Lean oppose: Trayvon White, Gray
Unknown views: Mendelsohn, Bonds, Grosso, Nadeau, McDuffie, Allen,
Lean support: Todd (he is Bowser's lackey)
Definitely support Maret deal: Evans
I think the Council would have momentum to take action on this deal. It would be quicker than going through the courts.
I think Bowser killed momentum on Kojo. Only so many fights the council is willing to pick. Maret — this is the last public good you’ll get from DC taxpayers. Everyone is watching you now. Start your fundraising if you need more stuff.