Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Can't tell if this is a dig at Langley for having the suspensions, or passive-aggressive as though non-Langley people would know about this resolution.
10/10 on DC Urban Mom lacrosse posting for maximum snark and tone.
What were the suspensions at Langley about? Academic or based on behavior during a game?
Mostly in school behavior, coaches are not very lenient which doesn't seem to be working well for them this year
Langley kids in trouble? This is unprecedented!
You know how those kids are man, socioeconomic factors am I right!?
Mfs js be making up words at this point ðŸ˜
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Can't tell if this is a dig at Langley for having the suspensions, or passive-aggressive as though non-Langley people would know about this resolution.
10/10 on DC Urban Mom lacrosse posting for maximum snark and tone.
What were the suspensions at Langley about? Academic or based on behavior during a game?
Mostly in school behavior, coaches are not very lenient which doesn't seem to be working well for them this year
Langley kids in trouble? This is unprecedented!
You know how those kids are man, socioeconomic factors am I right!?
Anonymous wrote:As mentioned I think it’s pretty clear Indy looks the part. In no particular order Robo, YT, JM, BF, and Cosby are in the mix. Unlikely those 6 lose to anyone else besides themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Is Langley's hotshot goalie one of their injuries? Goaltending is at a premium in low scoring games. At least 2 of the last 3 McLean goals were easy saves. Crazy to watch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.
If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .
Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before
Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.
Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.
I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?
Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Can't tell if this is a dig at Langley for having the suspensions, or passive-aggressive as though non-Langley people would know about this resolution.
10/10 on DC Urban Mom lacrosse posting for maximum snark and tone.
What were the suspensions at Langley about? Academic or based on behavior during a game?
Mostly in school behavior, coaches are not very lenient which doesn't seem to be working well for them this year
Langley kids in trouble? This is unprecedented!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Can't tell if this is a dig at Langley for having the suspensions, or passive-aggressive as though non-Langley people would know about this resolution.
10/10 on DC Urban Mom lacrosse posting for maximum snark and tone.
Spreading false info, classic parents on this app who don’t know anything. Stick to hyping up your kid and stop speaking on things you don’t know, you look silly.
What were the suspensions at Langley about? Academic or based on behavior during a game?
Mostly in school behavior, coaches are not very lenient which doesn't seem to be working well for them this year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Please come back tomorrow and tell me how this went.
I’m back, looks like I was right they figured it out and handled stone bridge no problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't know why nobody is taking Langley, with all their suspensions figured out Stone Bridge will be no issue
Please come back tomorrow and tell me how this went.