Anonymous wrote:Congrats to Potomac for winning its first ever VISAA state title by knocking off STAB yesterday.
Panthers capped off their best season in school history’s.
Congrats ladies and coaches!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC
Come on. lmao
Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.
See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.
playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.
One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.
If you keep bringing up your kids on this forum, you should expect someone will clap back. This is not the place where you should expect positive reinforcement on your anonymous hot take about how great your child played. Call your mother instead.
Not the OP and no dog in this particular fight, but do want these pages to work, so going to weigh in.
No one mentioned a specific kid or kids. More than half SJC's starters are underclassmen. The post seemed relevant to me in relation to the ongoing debate on how to work underclassmen into the Varsity rotation; a discussion that focused on some of the ISL schools. With that background, you went out of your way to attack a further subset and point out a game where you perceived they didn't play their best--apparently erroneously in part.
I think those of us who saw the game, or watched the feed, can all note that GC overpowered SJC. Good game for the Falcons. Your intent on personalizing this is ugly, and entirely on you. You should call your mother, or your psychologist, to explore that, but those viewpoints should not be welcome here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You'll find fresh/soph players in the easy games that every ISL school plays even SR/SSSAS, but when it comes to tougher competition, it's a different story. If the older players have the upper hand in skill and experience, you can bet the coach will choose them. A savvy coach won't risk playing fresh/soph in crucial games unless they truly are better than the older players and have something special to offer.
wrong there are no freshmen on SSSAS Varsity and likely will be no freshman or sophomores next year as there are only 2 seniors leaving and the coach does not ever sub.
And there will be transfers so get ready for that.
There’s no way anyone would be stupid enough to transfer in there
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You'll find fresh/soph players in the easy games that every ISL school plays even SR/SSSAS, but when it comes to tougher competition, it's a different story. If the older players have the upper hand in skill and experience, you can bet the coach will choose them. A savvy coach won't risk playing fresh/soph in crucial games unless they truly are better than the older players and have something special to offer.
wrong there are no freshmen on SSSAS Varsity and likely will be no freshman or sophomores next year as there are only 2 seniors leaving and the coach does not ever sub.
And there will be transfers so get ready for that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC
Come on. lmao
Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.
See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.
playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.
One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.
If you keep bringing up your kids on this forum, you should expect someone will clap back. This is not the place where you should expect positive reinforcement on your anonymous hot take about how great your child played. Call your mother instead.
Not the OP and no dog in this particular fight, but do want these pages to work, so going to weigh in.
No one mentioned a specific kid or kids. More than half SJC's starters are underclassmen. The post seemed relevant to me in relation to the ongoing debate on how to work underclassmen into the Varsity rotation; a discussion that focused on some of the ISL schools. With that background, you went out of your way to attack a further subset and point out a game where you perceived they didn't play their best--apparently erroneously in part.
I think those of us who saw the game, or watched the feed, can all note that GC overpowered SJC. Good game for the Falcons. Your intent on personalizing this is ugly, and entirely on you. You should call your mother, or your psychologist, to explore that, but those viewpoints should not be welcome here.
Despite having a big senior class, I think GC had 3-4 underclassmen starters against SJC in the championship game. One might have even been a freshmen?
Anonymous wrote:Saints transfers are likely to look at Potomac or Visi.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC
Come on. lmao
Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.
See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.
playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC
Come on. lmao
Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.
See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.
playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.
One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.
If you keep bringing up your kids on this forum, you should expect someone will clap back. This is not the place where you should expect positive reinforcement on your anonymous hot take about how great your child played. Call your mother instead.
Not the OP and no dog in this particular fight, but do want these pages to work, so going to weigh in.
No one mentioned a specific kid or kids. More than half SJC's starters are underclassmen. The post seemed relevant to me in relation to the ongoing debate on how to work underclassmen into the Varsity rotation; a discussion that focused on some of the ISL schools. With that background, you went out of your way to attack a further subset and point out a game where you perceived they didn't play their best--apparently erroneously in part.
I think those of us who saw the game, or watched the feed, can all note that GC overpowered SJC. Good game for the Falcons. Your intent on personalizing this is ugly, and entirely on you. You should call your mother, or your psychologist, to explore that, but those viewpoints should not be welcome here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You'll find fresh/soph players in the easy games that every ISL school plays even SR/SSSAS, but when it comes to tougher competition, it's a different story. If the older players have the upper hand in skill and experience, you can bet the coach will choose them. A savvy coach won't risk playing fresh/soph in crucial games unless they truly are better than the older players and have something special to offer.
wrong there are no freshmen on SSSAS Varsity and likely will be no freshman or sophomores next year as there are only 2 seniors leaving and the coach does not ever sub.
And there will be transfers so get ready for that.
Transfers to SSSA varsity.
At $55 k per year. Right? No way. Visi and SR cheaper.
Yes actually it has happened and will be next year too. Visi and SR might be a better choice but it is happening.