Anonymous
Post 09/25/2022 14:36     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies


Abortion won't stop. It will just be the rich that get it.


Guess Mississippi will limit abortions to 15 weeks pregnant and under.

That’s 96% of abortions anyhow and still a carve out for health if the women.


Who’s out there hemming and hawing about getting an abortion for 15, 20, 25 weeks? Waiting for a payout or an engagement? Sounds like drama.


Idiot.

A total ban, in other words.
Anonymous
Post 09/25/2022 14:35     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Ha! When he said she should be having this conversation with her doctor I almost lost it. It's beyond absurd.

Me too. And the staffer is so clearly grossed out by the conversation; no one has ever discussed discharge or spotting with him and he finds the idea repellent. I bet the idiot doesn’t understand that he told on himself.


Right. I can imagine him wondering, "what does a uterus or bleeding have to do with abortions? Uteruses are lady business."

He’s just so grossed out and doesn’t understand her point even though he makes it for her.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 20:20     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Ha! When he said she should be having this conversation with her doctor I almost lost it. It's beyond absurd.

Me too. And the staffer is so clearly grossed out by the conversation; no one has ever discussed discharge or spotting with him and he finds the idea repellent. I bet the idiot doesn’t understand that he told on himself.


Right. I can imagine him wondering, "what does a uterus or bleeding have to do with abortions? Uteruses are lady business."
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 17:27     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Ha! When he said she should be having this conversation with her doctor I almost lost it. It's beyond absurd.

Me too. And the staffer is so clearly grossed out by the conversation; no one has ever discussed discharge or spotting with him and he finds the idea repellent. I bet the idiot doesn’t understand that he told on himself.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 16:37     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So tired of men trying to control women.

I’m tired of the women who help them.


I am angry at both. I mean, states want to go back to 1864? Really?
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 14:32     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:


Ha! When he said she should be having this conversation with her doctor I almost lost it. It's beyond absurd.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 11:29     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies


Abortion won't stop. It will just be the rich that get it.


Guess Mississippi will limit abortions to 15 weeks pregnant and under.

That’s 96% of abortions anyhow and still a carve out for health if the women.


Who’s out there hemming and hawing about getting an abortion for 15, 20, 25 weeks? Waiting for a payout or an engagement? Sounds like drama.


Idiot.

Forced birthers don’t care that they’re completely inconsistent and unintelligent. They just want to hurt women.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 11:28     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 02:57     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:So tired of men trying to control women.

I’m tired of the women who help them.
Anonymous
Post 09/24/2022 00:06     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Finally, after the suctioning of 63 million growing babies


Abortion won't stop. It will just be the rich that get it.


Guess Mississippi will limit abortions to 15 weeks pregnant and under.

That’s 96% of abortions anyhow and still a carve out for health if the women.


Who’s out there hemming and hawing about getting an abortion for 15, 20, 25 weeks? Waiting for a payout or an engagement? Sounds like drama.


Idiot.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2022 23:38     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

So tired of men trying to control women.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2022 23:18     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Arizona bans all abortion. One less state my daughter will apply to for college.

It’s actually older than Arizona.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2022 23:11     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Arizona bans all abortion. One less state my daughter will apply to for college.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2022 22:21     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.


And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

At this point I think they want to encourage the Democratic voters and not give the forced birther lunatics a boost at the polls. Promising to enlarge the court would get them out to vote.


You are probably right, not many in my camp are NOT going to vote just because they aren’t talking about expanding the court.


You e got to be kidding. I vote in every election and any woman with any sense is not voting for any Republican candidates this election. They aren't sitting it out.


That’s what I said. Double negative translates to most every woman in my camp is voting regardless.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2022 22:07     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:https://www.cnbc.com/2022/09/23/biden-promises-to-codify-roe-if-two-more-democrats-are-elected-to-the-senate.html

With 46 days to go until November’s Election Day, Biden urged supporters at a Democratic National Committee event to consider “what’s on the ballot,” listing issues including abortion.
“If you give me two more senators in the United States Senate, I promise you, I promise you, we’re going to codify Roe and once again make Roe the law of the land,” Biden said.


And states rights republicans will sue and win at SCOTUS. Rings hollow for me, I want to hear him say they’re going to expand the court. But I’ll take this. Voting this weekend.

At this point I think they want to encourage the Democratic voters and not give the forced birther lunatics a boost at the polls. Promising to enlarge the court would get them out to vote.


You are probably right, not many in my camp are NOT going to vote just because they aren’t talking about expanding the court.


You e got to be kidding. I vote in every election and any woman with any sense is not voting for any Republican candidates this election. They aren't sitting it out.