Saints transfers are likely to look at Potomac or Visi.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You'll find fresh/soph players in the easy games that every ISL school plays even SR/SSSAS, but when it comes to tougher competition, it's a different story. If the older players have the upper hand in skill and experience, you can bet the coach will choose them. A savvy coach won't risk playing fresh/soph in crucial games unless they truly are better than the older players and have something special to offer.

wrong there are no freshmen on SSSAS Varsity and likely will be no freshman or sophomores next year as there are only 2 seniors leaving and the coach does not ever sub.

And there will be transfers so get ready for that.

Anonymous wrote:Similarly in college, coaches do not allocate game time for player development; that is designated for practice and individual training. Coaches primarily emphasize the team's success over the growth of individual players. It is unreasonable to anticipate high school coaches to concentrate on enhancing your player. Their main objective is to secure wins with the best players, occasionally making substitutions when needed. Most teams are composed of juniors and seniors, with a few younger players included. This applies to virtually every ISL lax team. The majority of younger players and parents have misguided beliefs that their child is superior, despite the coach observing them in practice and understanding their capabilities. If your child truly excelled as a freshman/sophomore, they would receive more playing time....

No one is suggesting that coaches put inferior players or underclassman in general on the field during a close game just so they can get practice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC

Come on. lmao

Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.

See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.

playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.

One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.

If you keep bringing up your kids on this forum, you should expect someone will clap back. This is not the place where you should expect positive reinforcement on your anonymous hot take about how great your child played. Call your mother instead.

Not the OP and no dog in this particular fight, but do want these pages to work, so going to weigh in.

No one mentioned a specific kid or kids. More than half SJC's starters are underclassmen. The post seemed relevant to me in relation to the ongoing debate on how to work underclassmen into the Varsity rotation; a discussion that focused on some of the ISL schools. With that background, you went out of your way to attack a further subset and point out a game where you perceived they didn't play their best--apparently erroneously in part.

I think those of us who saw the game, or watched the feed, can all note that GC overpowered SJC. Good game for the Falcons. Your intent on personalizing this is ugly, and entirely on you. You should call your mother, or your psychologist, to explore that, but those viewpoints should not be welcome here.

Anonymous wrote:You'll find fresh/soph players in the easy games that every ISL school plays even SR/SSSAS, but when it comes to tougher competition, it's a different story. If the older players have the upper hand in skill and experience, you can bet the coach will choose them. A savvy coach won't risk playing fresh/soph in crucial games unless they truly are better than the older players and have something special to offer.

wrong there are no freshmen on SSSAS Varsity and likely will be no freshman or sophomores next year as there are only 2 seniors leaving and the coach does not ever sub.

Anonymous wrote:Similarly in college, coaches do not allocate game time for player development; that is designated for practice and individual training. Coaches primarily emphasize the team's success over the growth of individual players. It is unreasonable to anticipate high school coaches to concentrate on enhancing your player. Their main objective is to secure wins with the best players, occasionally making substitutions when needed. Most teams are composed of juniors and seniors, with a few younger players included. This applies to virtually every ISL lax team. The majority of younger players and parents have misguided beliefs that their child is superior, despite the coach observing them in practice and understanding their capabilities. If your child truly excelled as a freshman/sophomore, they would receive more playing time....

This. Development occurs in the offseason.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC

Come on. lmao

Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.

See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.

playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.

One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.

If you keep bringing up your kids on this forum, you should expect someone will clap back. This is not the place where you should expect positive reinforcement on your anonymous hot take about how great your child played. Call your mother instead.

Anonymous wrote:Similarly in college, coaches do not allocate game time for player development; that is designated for practice and individual training. Coaches primarily emphasize the team's success over the growth of individual players. It is unreasonable to anticipate high school coaches to concentrate on enhancing your player. Their main objective is to secure wins with the best players, occasionally making substitutions when needed. Most teams are composed of juniors and seniors, with a few younger players included. This applies to virtually every ISL lax team. The majority of younger players and parents have misguided beliefs that their child is superior, despite the coach observing them in practice and understanding their capabilities. If your child truly excelled as a freshman/sophomore, they would receive more playing time....

Or if your child and their parent has worked out some kind of arrangement with the coach.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC

Come on. lmao

Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.

See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.

playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.

One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.

nah. they folded

Taking receipts. Thanks for the off-season motivation

congrats on your "BIG" win.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC

Come on. lmao

Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.

See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.

playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.

One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.

nah. they folded

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC beat Visi. They would beat SSSAS now too. They are perfect reason why you let underclassmen be on varsity. The team will improve during the year. Great job SJC

Come on. lmao

Not sure I agree that SJC would beat SSSAS now, but agree that underclassmen develop better when they get to play and overall team balance over multiple years can improve.

See eg Maryvale and SPSG in the IAAM. Both started Freshmen over established upperclass commits. Will be a benefit over the next several years.

playing time helps but the sjc freshman were a no show in WCAC championship game.

One of them had 3 goals, but nice post jack wagon.