Anonymous wrote:There is no “right” for every person to have any gun at any time. The second amendment is pretty clearly about militias and the deranged Supreme Court precedent that put us on this path should be overturned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly care how many successful cases of "defensive gun use" there are because *I* (and in my opinion no normal person) will ever "defensively" use a gun. So why should I care? I don't want to live in the Wild West, I want to live in a civilized country. Just like gun nuts are willing to manifest the type of society they want to live in, so am I. Not one in which people are running around "defending" themselves with guns. More likely they are just terrorizing others.
Your sentence structure is nonsensical here. I just want to point out that I will never get an abortion. Should I not care about that as a right?
(First-time poster on this thread.)
If you have an abortion that does not impact me, that’s your body.
If you insist that getting into a shootout at Walmart is “defensive gun use” and that’s how our country should function, that indeed affects me.
There is no “right” for every person to have any gun at any time. The second amendment is pretty clearly about militias and the deranged Supreme Court precedent that put us on this path should be overturned.
Anonymous wrote:Burn the guns!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly care how many successful cases of "defensive gun use" there are because *I* (and in my opinion no normal person) will ever "defensively" use a gun. So why should I care? I don't want to live in the Wild West, I want to live in a civilized country. Just like gun nuts are willing to manifest the type of society they want to live in, so am I. Not one in which people are running around "defending" themselves with guns. More likely they are just terrorizing others.
Your sentence structure is nonsensical here. I just want to point out that I will never get an abortion. Should I not care about that as a right?
(First-time poster on this thread.)
Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly care how many successful cases of "defensive gun use" there are because *I* (and in my opinion no normal person) will ever "defensively" use a gun. So why should I care? I don't want to live in the Wild West, I want to live in a civilized country. Just like gun nuts are willing to manifest the type of society they want to live in, so am I. Not one in which people are running around "defending" themselves with guns. More likely they are just terrorizing others.
Anonymous wrote:I don't particularly care how many successful cases of "defensive gun use" there are because *I* (and in my opinion no normal person) will ever "defensively" use a gun. So why should I care? I don't want to live in the Wild West, I want to live in a civilized country. Just like gun nuts are willing to manifest the type of society they want to live in, so am I. Not one in which people are running around "defending" themselves with guns. More likely they are just terrorizing others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CDC reported as part of a 2013 study that:
“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.“
Link?
Here’s a thought: search a few words and see what pops up.
You make a claim- you provide the proof
Stop being a petulant child.
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/firearms/fastfact.html
Excerpted from CDC document:
Estimates of defensive gun use vary depending on the questions asked, populations studied, timeframe, and other factors related to the design of studies. The report Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violenceexternal icon indicates a range of 60,000 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses each year.
There. You now have attribution. Now stop arguing like a 5 year old.
Anonymous wrote:CDC reported as part of a 2013 study that:
“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.“
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another night and another shooting in NW.
Will there be an end?
Send us the background on the shooter and victim please. Let’s start a catalog and focus on the shooters and not the tool.
There is no mention of any information you asked. Three were dead and some are in hospital.
According to NBC4, a honda car stopped on the road, gunman started shooting to a crowd.
That was it.
No video, no photo.
Targeted? Random?
Better stay home after dark in NW.
Sounds like the victim’s families should be able to bring a massive lawsuit against Honda to force them out of business. One of their cars was used in this crime, so they’re clearly responsible.
Cars= necessary tool for living
Guns= only necessary to kill people or animals
Why do we have to trudge through these same stupid arguments over and over again. They are so trite and third grade level.
Cars a necessary tool for living? No, they are not. Plenty live without one. Weapons were created long before the wheel and motorized vehicles and have been helping people to live (hunt) and stay alive (protect self, family, tribe) for thousands of years. Try again third grader.
No.
That is not an effective argument for guns. Female genital mutilation also existed before cars. Nor does anyone want to ban hunting rifles.
You are not some vigilante protecting your home. Your gun is statistically most likely to kill you or someone you love, not an enemy or intruder. You are not some brave warrior protecting your castle. Please, grow up!
There are thousands of defensive firearm uses in the United States each year, the vast majority not requiring the firing of a single shot, and most unreported for that reason. The trite truism you parrot about risky to gun owners ignores that. Firearms are the single effective means for a weak victim to defend against a powerful aggressor. Whether to own a fires got self defense is a private decision. Criminal misuse of firearms is the subject of numerous laws, and if criminals who misused firearms went away for a good long time, it would be a certainty that they would not be misusing any more firearms during that interval.
Yes, suicides are very high relative to homicides. I think more guns likely leads to more suicides, though a substantial fraction would be just people choosing suicide by gun versus another means.
At least the poster didn't bring up the similar claim that having a gun makes you more likely to get shot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CDC reported as part of a 2013 study that:
“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.“
Link?
Here’s a thought: search a few words and see what pops up.
You make a claim- you provide the proof
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:CDC reported as part of a 2013 study that:
“Almost all national survey estimates indicate that defensive gun uses by victims are at least as common as offensive uses by criminals, with estimates of annual uses ranging from about 500,000 to more than 3 million, in the context of about 300,000 violent crimes involving firearms in 2008.“
Link?
Here’s a thought: search a few words and see what pops up.