Therefore current 6th graders will be well into their math track and this should not factor in. I'd bee more concerned with rising 3rd graders possibly 4th graders.Anonymous wrote:They just shared that it will be unveiled in 2023-2024. Next stage by 2024-2025 and fully implemented in 2025-2026 so it will slowly roll out.
Anonymous wrote:I though this was all implemented in 2025-26. Current 6th graders will follow the current system.
I though this was all implemented in 2025-26. Current 6th graders will follow the current system.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has two kids who are thriving in different math tracks can see this is going to be a lot harder than the glib pronouncements about collaborative work and depth suggest. And I don’t think it’s very likely to help kids who would have been on the less accelerated tracks in their math confidence levels at all!
Having said that, it’s math outcomes now are awful for many, many kids do I agree something needs to change. I just don’t have confidence in this plan (and nor do I find the supporting studies all that applicable or compelling.)
We are in the same boat. My 6th grade AAP student is not even a "math person" and will either take Algebra I HN in 7th or 8th, depending on SOL score. They're challenged and enjoying math. My child who wavers between just below and average is much better served in a class with other students working at their pace. Shoving them all into one class hurts both of them.
Also, having got to a high school that offered practical and college-track math classes, it worked out well. Two of my classmates who weren't interested in college started their own business after graduating, and they were able to take a basic business accounting class in high school that helped them learn to keep books, calculate quarterly sales tax, and set up inventory/invoicing. I don't think sticking everyone with the same choices best serves all students. Giving them options to choose the classes that best fit their desired outcome seems more advantageous for all, including the workforce they're graduating into.
Anonymous wrote:Reminder that VDOE is holding its third community session on VMPI tonight. Hear more about the shift in approach.
Tuesday 4/27 at 6:30pm
Essential Concepts courses Grades 8-10.
Watch live (or recorded later):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrbxl9wHScrWKWIEoUWNIfQ
You can still submit Qs/comments in advance or in the chat during the session:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSesz3YtqVqXtAioJKX0xtYbPxUW6l7dfpbwfdbQyEQ5eTgZMQ/viewform
Anonymous wrote:They are still hashing it all out so TBD.
For next year, there are no VDOE changes that would preclude that from happening. If your district changes something, that's on them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has Fairfax County made any changes to eligibility for moving ahead in math?
Melanie Meren said recently in a Zoom that everyone is misunderstanding the initiative. Megan McLaughlin is raising concerns and asking for clarification. Ricardy Anderson has pointed people to the webinars. That’s all I have seen from SB members here.
Loudon looks much further along in planning. No shock that FCPS is out of the loop. Even rural districts have started pilots. At least this is a good one to be behind on.
I’m just saying I have a post grad degree so I’m not the least educated or literate parent in VA. If I don’t understand the initiative I think it’s not clear to a lot of people!
This is one of my biggest issues with the published materials on this initiative. They are not clear/upfront about what this actually looks like on the ground for kids or how it will be practically implemented. There is a lot of sociological and education research jargon - I have an M.Ed, and it was a slog for me to read and make minimal sense of. All I wanted to know was what will math look like for my children (one in advanced math, one struggling with grade-level) for there rest of their school career? I don't give a crap about educational policy research or the latest educational fads - just tell me if my 7th grader can take Algebra I Honors next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has two kids who are thriving in different math tracks can see this is going to be a lot harder than the glib pronouncements about collaborative work and depth suggest. And I don’t think it’s very likely to help kids who would have been on the less accelerated tracks in their math confidence levels at all!
Having said that, it’s math outcomes now are awful for many, many kids do I agree something needs to change. I just don’t have confidence in this plan (and nor do I find the supporting studies all that applicable or compelling.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has Fairfax County made any changes to eligibility for moving ahead in math?
Melanie Meren said recently in a Zoom that everyone is misunderstanding the initiative. Megan McLaughlin is raising concerns and asking for clarification. Ricardy Anderson has pointed people to the webinars. That’s all I have seen from SB members here.
Loudon looks much further along in planning. No shock that FCPS is out of the loop. Even rural districts have started pilots. At least this is a good one to be behind on.
I’m just saying I have a post grad degree so I’m not the least educated or literate parent in VA. If I don’t understand the initiative I think it’s not clear to a lot of people! [/quote
This is one of my biggest issues with the published materials on this initiative. They are not clear/upfront about what this actually looks like on the ground for kids or how it will be practically implemented. There is a lot of sociological and education research jargon - I have an M.Ed, and it was a slog for me to read and make minimal sense of. All I wanted to know was what will math look like for my children (one in advanced math, one struggling with grade-level) for there rest of their school career? I don't give a crap about educational policy research or the latest educational fads - just tell me if my 7th grader can take Algebra I Honors next year.
Anonymous wrote:The more I read about this the less concerned I am. Many states teach math this way. It still allows for differentiation within the curriculum, much like they teach reading/language arts now. Seems like it will be the best system for the vast majority of kids and will lessen the ultra-competitive parenting that happens in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/virginia-advanced-math-classes-equity/2021/04/26/41f3dbd0-a6a3-11eb-bca5-048b2759a489_story.html
This is encouraging! But also hard to believe a post referencing FCPS and also showing a stack of textbooks!
LOL notice that caption says the photo is from a private school!
That is hilarious. Also very on-brand for a Catholic school (which is where it's from).Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/virginia-advanced-math-classes-equity/2021/04/26/41f3dbd0-a6a3-11eb-bca5-048b2759a489_story.html
This is encouraging! But also hard to believe a post referencing FCPS and also showing a stack of textbooks!