Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
OK, maybe you are right. You have provided unimpeachable proof the ivies graduate imbeciles. Mea Culpa.
It’s not just Ivies. Harvard graduated everyone. But many other schools are also difficult for rodeo girl.
Anonymous wrote:You can't engineer your kid to be something he/she isn't. It's pretty obvious in sports when parents try (the Ryan Leaf/Todd Marinovich syndrome) even when they are talented.
The same goes for academics . All you can do is give them support and every opportunity you can afford and stay the hell out of their way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
OK, maybe you are right. You have provided unimpeachable proof the ivies graduate imbeciles. Mea Culpa.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Start the Common App in 9th grade...keep using it to add all the EC stats. You get into the habit of logging your accomplishment as well as have a fair sense where your application is weak.
Chart your courses for the entire HS journey beginning of 9th grade
Advanced Math actually starts from ES years. Don't wait for the school to enrich and accelerate. You can do it on your own by using Khan Academy.
College visits from 10th grade. Virtual is absolutely fine. Interview them.
You can do this?? I didn't even know that.
+2. Is this true?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC and my DH both went to Ivies. Those kids from the “rodeo” backgrounds had a very hard time at those difficult schools. High level of dropping out and mental breakdowns. Those social experiments are not very kind in the end.
You just made that up and it is not true. The graduation rates prove it.
Of course they eventually graduate them. The schools don’t want to feel like losers for their social experiment. Then they go on to the job market and employers go WTH? And they end up well whatever. They also have a great deal of difficulty with the professional entrance exams. However they populate SJW and low pay non profits.
You are wrong, full stop. They do not "eventually" graduate them. Poor kids at Harvard graduate at almost the same rate as other kids. And research has clearly shown that going to an elite school confers advantages on poor students and POC much more than on wealthier and white students. Facts matter.
From Harvard's common data set for freshmen starting fall 2013 (most recent data available)
First-time, full-time freshmen receiving Pell Grant= 273
graduated in 4 years or less: 224 (82%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 260 (95%)
First-time, full-time freshmen, no Pell = 1378
graduated in 4 years or less: 1176 (85%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 1343 (97%)
You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
These are the graduation rates for all freshmen entering in Fall 2013. Are you under the impression that 85% of Harvard freshmen major in CS, econ, math, and engineering?
Also, are we moving the goalposts now? The statement was that these students don't graduate on time. This is demonstrably false at many schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC and my DH both went to Ivies. Those kids from the “rodeo” backgrounds had a very hard time at those difficult schools. High level of dropping out and mental breakdowns. Those social experiments are not very kind in the end.
You just made that up and it is not true. The graduation rates prove it.
Of course they eventually graduate them. The schools don’t want to feel like losers for their social experiment. Then they go on to the job market and employers go WTH? And they end up well whatever. They also have a great deal of difficulty with the professional entrance exams. However they populate SJW and low pay non profits.
You are wrong, full stop. They do not "eventually" graduate them. Poor kids at Harvard graduate at almost the same rate as other kids. And research has clearly shown that going to an elite school confers advantages on poor students and POC much more than on wealthier and white students. Facts matter.
From Harvard's common data set for freshmen starting fall 2013 (most recent data available)
First-time, full-time freshmen receiving Pell Grant= 273
graduated in 4 years or less: 224 (82%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 260 (95%)
First-time, full-time freshmen, no Pell = 1378
graduated in 4 years or less: 1176 (85%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 1343 (97%)
You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
Anonymous wrote:where's the data from 2014 on?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
OK, maybe you are right. You have provided unimpeachable proof the ivies graduate imbeciles. Mea Culpa.
everyone has to have a STEM degree because otherwise you'll be a barista. It doesn't matter if the sociology degree is from Yale and you get accepted to Harvard law- you'll still be a barista. To PP, you might want to dig deeper- it's been years since I looked or cared, but I remember philosophy majors doing very well
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
OK, maybe you are right. You have provided unimpeachable proof the ivies graduate imbeciles. Mea Culpa.
Anonymous wrote:You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC and my DH both went to Ivies. Those kids from the “rodeo” backgrounds had a very hard time at those difficult schools. High level of dropping out and mental breakdowns. Those social experiments are not very kind in the end.
You just made that up and it is not true. The graduation rates prove it.
Of course they eventually graduate them. The schools don’t want to feel like losers for their social experiment. Then they go on to the job market and employers go WTH? And they end up well whatever. They also have a great deal of difficulty with the professional entrance exams. However they populate SJW and low pay non profits.
You are wrong, full stop. They do not "eventually" graduate them. Poor kids at Harvard graduate at almost the same rate as other kids. And research has clearly shown that going to an elite school confers advantages on poor students and POC much more than on wealthier and white students. Facts matter.
From Harvard's common data set for freshmen starting fall 2013 (most recent data available)
First-time, full-time freshmen receiving Pell Grant= 273
graduated in 4 years or less: 224 (82%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 260 (95%)
First-time, full-time freshmen, no Pell = 1378
graduated in 4 years or less: 1176 (85%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 1343 (97%)
You're wrong. Graduating doesn't mean anything if your degree is in sociology or gender studies. Upper-middle class White/Asian kids dominate the high-paying majors at Ivies (CS, Econ, Math, Engineering). Plus most rodeo kids didn't do so well in corporate recruiting due to their lower GPAs and weaker class schedules.
-Ivy alum
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC and my DH both went to Ivies. Those kids from the “rodeo” backgrounds had a very hard time at those difficult schools. High level of dropping out and mental breakdowns. Those social experiments are not very kind in the end.
You just made that up and it is not true. The graduation rates prove it.
Of course they eventually graduate them. The schools don’t want to feel like losers for their social experiment. Then they go on to the job market and employers go WTH? And they end up well whatever. They also have a great deal of difficulty with the professional entrance exams. However they populate SJW and low pay non profits.
You are wrong, full stop. They do not "eventually" graduate them. Poor kids at Harvard graduate at almost the same rate as other kids. And research has clearly shown that going to an elite school confers advantages on poor students and POC much more than on wealthier and white students. Facts matter.
From Harvard's common data set for freshmen starting fall 2013 (most recent data available)
First-time, full-time freshmen receiving Pell Grant= 273
graduated in 4 years or less: 224 (82%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 260 (95%)
First-time, full-time freshmen, no Pell = 1378
graduated in 4 years or less: 1176 (85%)
graduated in 6 years or less: 1343 (97%)
Anonymous wrote:where's the data from 2014 on?