Anonymous wrote:PP here... U15 team. We had four tapped for National Team
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?
I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.
All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.
Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.
Well, since you want to be like that. Let me give you my two cents.
VDA out possessed, out shot, out defended and all around out played FCV on that particular day. There wasn’t a person that watched that game that didn’t walk away saying VDA was the better team ... on that day. And yes, many people not associated with either team were watching...to include Loudoun players and parents. Does FCV have good players. Sure. So does VDA and that’s why the game is played. The truth of the matter is that it could have easily been 3-0 in favor of VDA if the opportunities were finished...but it could have never been the other way around because FCV had one legit (maybe 2) shots on goal. Every other opportunity was set pieces. Which FCV excels at. The one goal they scored was on a set piece outside the box on a handball call. It was a quality shot by a good player. Wasn’t surprised.
The three goals called back were due to reckless play (fouls) on set pieces. All of which were properly called. And yes, the game was properly officiated.
1. You cannot head the ball out of the goalies hands.
2. You can not slam the goalie and force her to drop the ball (foul)
3. You can not run at the goalie full speed and slam her into the back of the net (Foul - extremely reckless and should have been carded)
Again. FCV is a good team with good players. The fact that you can’t acknowledge that VDA has talent as well is ridiculous. The team that played better did not win. I’m sure Christian told the girls such.
You don't know Christian! And I think I actually heard Bobby's "coaching" from my house!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?
I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.
All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.
Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.
Well, since you want to be like that. Let me give you my two cents.
VDA out possessed, out shot, out defended and all around out played FCV on that particular day. There wasn’t a person that watched that game that didn’t walk away saying VDA was the better team ... on that day. And yes, many people not associated with either team were watching...to include Loudoun players and parents. Does FCV have good players. Sure. So does VDA and that’s why the game is played. The truth of the matter is that it could have easily been 3-0 in favor of VDA if the opportunities were finished...but it could have never been the other way around because FCV had one legit (maybe 2) shots on goal. Every other opportunity was set pieces. Which FCV excels at. The one goal they scored was on a set piece outside the box on a handball call. It was a quality shot by a good player. Wasn’t surprised.
The three goals called back were due to reckless play (fouls) on set pieces. All of which were properly called. And yes, the game was properly officiated.
1. You cannot head the ball out of the goalies hands.
2. You can not slam the goalie and force her to drop the ball (foul)
3. You can not run at the goalie full speed and slam her into the back of the net (Foul - extremely reckless and should have been carded)
Again. FCV is a good team with good players. The fact that you can’t acknowledge that VDA has talent as well is ridiculous. The team that played better did not win. I’m sure Christian told the girls such.
Anonymous wrote:What positions? I know the 10 for McLean is probably one of the chosen few...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are just trolling
They’re not trolling. McLean just had another one.
How many did Loudoun get? Ah, I see. Keep sporting that Mohawk tho. Advertising and marketing is what keeps you afloat.
As if you wouldn’t do that same thing if something this good ever happened to your club.
Not too bright up there, I see. Maybe all that gel is getting to ya, bud.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are just trolling
They’re not trolling. McLean just had another one.
How many did Loudoun get? Ah, I see. Keep sporting that Mohawk tho. Advertising and marketing is what keeps you afloat.
As if you wouldn’t do that same thing if something this good ever happened to your club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are just trolling
They’re not trolling. McLean just had another one.
How many did Loudoun get? Ah, I see. Keep sporting that Mohawk tho. Advertising and marketing is what keeps you afloat.
Anonymous wrote:They are just trolling
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Metro 07 is in Jeff Cup this year. They should win their bracket.
Playing in the 5th bracket down, they'd better.....
LoL the host of this subject thread tournament has all of their ECNL teams in 3rd or lower bracket.
But repthered tho
ReptheGA tho
The league that has players getting call ups to national team? Holla at me
A zoom meeting isn’t a call up. Do you even know what a call up is?
You know what....forget about it
GArising
Girls on our club were tapped for national team. They all just found out this week. Anyone else?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Metro 07 is in Jeff Cup this year. They should win their bracket.
Playing in the 5th bracket down, they'd better.....
LoL the host of this subject thread tournament has all of their ECNL teams in 3rd or lower bracket.
But repthered tho
ReptheGA tho
The league that has players getting call ups to national team? Holla at me
A zoom meeting isn’t a call up. Do you even know what a call up is?
You know what....forget about it
GArising
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You know why LOL. Only reason why they allowed that FCV 2004 team to play the VDA 2004 team last weekend was they thought it would be an easy game. Well, that backfired. VDA was way more organized, technical and had way more opportunities to score. Honestly, watch the film. VDA 2004 owned that FCV 2004 team, can you imagine what the VDA 2006 team would do?
I think "owned" is a little optimistic, LOL. FCV had three goals which got called back. When was the last time you saw that? VDA has some very good players, FCV has some very good players. I'd say it was a hard fought game, and the top teams should be playing each other more often in the area. It was a fun one to watch.
All due respect, it doesn’t count if you continually slam a goalie with the purpose of knocking the ball out her possession. One of which should have been a straight red. With that aside, it was good game with good players.
Spoken like someone who hasn't seen the film. Score legitimately was 3-0. One reversed goal could be argued as a foul.
post the film? you can say this over and over again because there is no way for anyone to "watch the film"!!
Sock Puppet
I have the film and paid for downloads. So no problem, tell me how to post here and I will most definitely post them for all to see that the poster is completely accurate.