Anonymous wrote:40 is not too old to have a baby but it is selfish.
Anonymous wrote:40 is not too old to have a baby but it is selfish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are too young yet to realize that 40 is not old.
40 is middle age and too old to be having babies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people explain this to me please, I realize I'm being ignorant and probably will trigger the old farts on this forum. But why? Why not adopt? Do you really want to be 60 when your child is 20? 70 at 30? Women who have babies in their 40s really grosses me out.
I understand the economic and cultural differences for waiting to be older, but biologically you are at menopause age.
Why not adopt? Are you insane? Why would any woman who could easily get pregnant in her 40s choose adoption, which costs tens of thousands of dollars and often takes years?
Also, menopause age? LOL. Go back to high school biology.
Yeah, OP is one of those people who thinks adoption is easy, and not fraught with heartbreak, expense, and in some cases years of futile effort.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op, are you dense? The average age of menopause is 52!
Someone who goes through menopause at 40 has premature ovarian insufficiency.
I think ignorance is 🤮.
Sincerely,
Pregnant at age 28.
I apologize on behalf of all 20 something year olds for the OPs stupidity. Yes OP your opinion is stupid.
Omg this my period is regular as heck and I'm 45 and a half.
Same, 48.