Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
It seems like a couple coaches change clubs across the overall soccer scene here every year, so that's not a surprise, but is there a particular new angle or reason other than normal movement (someone leaves, someone else comes in) you'd think this?
LMVSC just sent out an e-mail wishing their director of athletic development (whatever that actually means) good luck in his future endeavors
How is this true? He’s supposed to be leading a Winter Sports Program starting January 5th
they just tweeted it too
https://twitter.com/LMVSCSoccer/status/1341808557851897861
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
Let’s assume this is true for a minute (players following). With exception of a couple teams that made a big move (after earlier going the other direction in at least 1 case), that influx was limited to a few players/age group while not losing a ton (although some people did leave). Consolidating talent in the small area covered by SYC/Gunston/LMVSC/South County programs gives those same coaches more talent to coach. I think the current coaches are an impressive group that has also managed to consolidate some kids that in years past have spread across those programs listed above, which kept them all in a similar competition level. Greater concentration of talented players coming together with good coaches is a good recipe for success.
How does the consolidation of talented players (which I agree happened) prove that the coaches are good? Nothing against anyone, but this is classic for this area. Couple clubs pull this off every few years and then it goes away just as quickly. Too many clubs, too many egos, too much money flowing for any of this to be sustainable.
Fair point - player consolidation improving the talent level doesn't prove the coaches are good. My opinion as an SYC parent is that at least the ones we've interacted with are good, but the proof will be if they can sustain and show continued development across multiple age groups. Consistently good results across a period of time and continued development are important and that will take a little while to show.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
It seems like a couple coaches change clubs across the overall soccer scene here every year, so that's not a surprise, but is there a particular new angle or reason other than normal movement (someone leaves, someone else comes in) you'd think this?
LMVSC just sent out an e-mail wishing their director of athletic development (whatever that actually means) good luck in his future endeavors
How is this true? He’s supposed to be leading a Winter Sports Program starting January 5th
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
It seems like a couple coaches change clubs across the overall soccer scene here every year, so that's not a surprise, but is there a particular new angle or reason other than normal movement (someone leaves, someone else comes in) you'd think this?
LMVSC just sent out an e-mail wishing their director of athletic development (whatever that actually means) good luck in his future endeavors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
It seems like a couple coaches change clubs across the overall soccer scene here every year, so that's not a surprise, but is there a particular new angle or reason other than normal movement (someone leaves, someone else comes in) you'd think this?
LMVSC just sent out an e-mail wishing their director of athletic development (whatever that actually means) good luck in his future endeavors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
It seems like a couple coaches change clubs across the overall soccer scene here every year, so that's not a surprise, but is there a particular new angle or reason other than normal movement (someone leaves, someone else comes in) you'd think this?
Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t be surprised if they picked up a few more additional coaches this year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
Let’s assume this is true for a minute (players following). With exception of a couple teams that made a big move (after earlier going the other direction in at least 1 case), that influx was limited to a few players/age group while not losing a ton (although some people did leave). Consolidating talent in the small area covered by SYC/Gunston/LMVSC/South County programs gives those same coaches more talent to coach. I think the current coaches are an impressive group that has also managed to consolidate some kids that in years past have spread across those programs listed above, which kept them all in a similar competition level. Greater concentration of talented players coming together with good coaches is a good recipe for success.
How does the consolidation of talented players (which I agree happened) prove that the coaches are good? Nothing against anyone, but this is classic for this area. Couple clubs pull this off every few years and then it goes away just as quickly. Too many clubs, too many egos, too much money flowing for any of this to be sustainable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
Let’s assume this is true for a minute (players following). With exception of a couple teams that made a big move (after earlier going the other direction in at least 1 case), that influx was limited to a few players/age group while not losing a ton (although some people did leave). Consolidating talent in the small area covered by SYC/Gunston/LMVSC/South County programs gives those same coaches more talent to coach. I think the current coaches are an impressive group that has also managed to consolidate some kids that in years past have spread across those programs listed above, which kept them all in a similar competition level. Greater concentration of talented players coming together with good coaches is a good recipe for success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
But with the same players they had Lee Mt. Vernon. those teams are so much better now at SYC. What was holding them back from being so good at Lee Mt. Vernon? Is the culture that much different ?
It’s not the same players in MLS. They have drawn more by taking a core group at SYC. SYC had some success before the shift, and the shifting players had some success before going to SYC. I don’t think any of this is surprising. This is what MLS and ambition will do for the right clubs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
But with the same players they had Lee Mt. Vernon. those teams are so much better now at SYC. What was holding them back from being so good at Lee Mt. Vernon? Is the culture that much different ?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?
They were successful at Lee Mt. Vernon and are still successful at SYC... Given that most of the Lee Mt. Vernon players followed their coaches to the new club.
Not sure they would've had success at SYC without those players though.
Anonymous wrote:Why are the same coaches more successful at SYC than they ever were at LEE MOUNT VERNON ?