Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?
She has dementia, so….. ????
Well, did she ask to step away from the judiciary committee on her own or did one of her handlers do it? Someone (or likely multiple people) have been enabling her for a long time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?
She has dementia, so….. ????
She isn’t legally incompetent as far as I know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?
She has dementia, so….. ????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?
She has dementia, so….. ????
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
This is getting crazy. She needs to do the right thing and retire. Can no one talk any sense into her?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
If she doesn’t resign they need 60 votes even to temporarily replace her on the Judiciary Committee. They’ll never get them because Republicans are thrilled by the pause in judicial confirmations. She needs to retire.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if she retired tomorrow, what would happen?
Newsom would appoint her replacement who would be there in days. Kamala Harris resigned on a Monday and her replacement was sworn in on Wednesday.
Anonymous wrote:So if she retired tomorrow, what would happen?
Anonymous wrote:So I think that a) Feinstein should not have run again and b) that she should have retired by now and c) I’m OK with Fetterman. BUT, I also think it’s interesting that all of this consternation about Feinstein hit just as Fetterman is about to return.
At least take her off the Judiciary Committee, FFS.
Anonymous wrote:This may have been asked but the shingles vaccine has been available for 20 years and a second, more effective shingles vaccine, for ten years. Why didn't she get at least one of them?
To everyone else, please get the two-shot shingles vaccine