Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Good, very good. The party loves him b/c he brings in tons of $$, his district is Asheville but also MAGA outside the city. He might get primaried but doubt anyone can match his funding/reach. Says a lot about Americans, much not nice.
Didn't he get redistricted? My mom is in his current district outside of Asheville and she's been saying for a while he won't be her representative anymore because they redid the boundary maps.
Cawthorn chose a new district - he wants to run in an even redder district.
https://www.themountaineer.com/news/the-real-story-behind-madison-cawthorn-switching-congressional-districts/article_ae55d270-46e3-11ec-94b9-236cb74043ff.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Good, very good. The party loves him b/c he brings in tons of $$, his district is Asheville but also MAGA outside the city. He might get primaried but doubt anyone can match his funding/reach. Says a lot about Americans, much not nice.
Didn't he get redistricted? My mom is in his current district outside of Asheville and she's been saying for a while he won't be her representative anymore because they redid the boundary maps.
Anonymous wrote:
Good, very good. The party loves him b/c he brings in tons of $$, his district is Asheville but also MAGA outside the city. He might get primaried but doubt anyone can match his funding/reach. Says a lot about Americans, much not nice.
Anonymous wrote:The entitlement here is really astounding:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/03/09/rep-madison-cawthorn-charged-with-driving-with-revoked-license-second-time/
Anonymous wrote:“A formal effort to evaluate whether North Carolina Rep. Madison Cawthorn should be disqualified as a candidate because of his involvement in the January 2021 rally that preceded the U.S. Capitol riot should be allowed to continue, voters and election officials told a federal judge.
Nearly a dozen North Carolina voters had filed a candidate challenge last month against the first-term Republican. On Monday, attorneys for the voters and the State Board of Elections turned in court filings arguing that Cawthorn’s motion to cancel the challenge process be rejected.”
https://apnews.com/article/elections-lawsuits-north-carolina-constitutions-congress-98cb70ead7f5421b1c318ff41fadd1bc
Anonymous wrote:Madison Cawthorn is citing a Confederate amnesty act from 1872 to defend against the push to remove him from office for his participation in the January 6 insurrection.
This is not a joke.