Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just reading the article. What about the fact that DNA was found in her car that was related to other assault cases? And the DNA was not her husband’s?
Is it linked to the secret husband with six kids? He would have had access to her car.
He has been cleared - solid alibi for that day.
Wait, what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just reading the article. What about the fact that DNA was found in her car that was related to other assault cases? And the DNA was not her husband’s?
Is it linked to the secret husband with six kids? He would have had access to her car.
He has been cleared - solid alibi for that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was totally him.
I thought he was suing for $15M for everything police put him through just to then drop the charges right before his trial. I dunno, I wouldn't being suing anyone for even a dime if I was guilty of the crime they're accusing me of. I would keep my head down.
Nah. He did it. She told her friends the marriage was rocky and he would not even speak of divorce. The day after she texted him that she was “done” he drives home from a job site (supposedly) and then his phone pings all over the house in a crazy pattern. He claims he was chasing a chipmunk in the house. He also said he went to bed at 8pm (with his wife “missing”!) but then his truck computer shows it was used at 9:30pm. The next day, they have him on camera visiting multiple public trash dumpsters.
Come on. He killed her.
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/suzanne-morphew-case-evidence-photos/
The sad thing is, his daughters believe him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was just reading the article. What about the fact that DNA was found in her car that was related to other assault cases? And the DNA was not her husband’s?
Is it linked to the secret husband with six kids? He would have had access to her car.
Anonymous wrote:I was just reading the article. What about the fact that DNA was found in her car that was related to other assault cases? And the DNA was not her husband’s?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this latest news. They dropped the caae against him ... because they wanted to find the body before the trial but there's not enough time?
Is this some kind of strategy?
Maybe they can’t delay the trial but don’t want to argue the case without a full investigation of evidence and a proper autopsy? If they go to trial and lose because of a lack of evidence they can’t re-try him because of double jeopardy. The body isn’t going anywhere , they can refile in 2023.
I wonder why they think they’d ever find the body. And if they do would the remains really be informative of the cause of death?
They found it. Apparently it’s under five feet of snow and ice in a rural mountainous area of Colorado that’s hard to get to?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was totally him.
I thought he was suing for $15M for everything police put him through just to then drop the charges right before his trial. I dunno, I wouldn't being suing anyone for even a dime if I was guilty of the crime they're accusing me of. I would keep my head down.
Nah. He did it. She told her friends the marriage was rocky and he would not even speak of divorce. The day after she texted him that she was “done” he drives home from a job site (supposedly) and then his phone pings all over the house in a crazy pattern. He claims he was chasing a chipmunk in the house. He also said he went to bed at 8pm (with his wife “missing”!) but then his truck computer shows it was used at 9:30pm. The next day, they have him on camera visiting multiple public trash dumpsters.
Come on. He killed her.
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/suzanne-morphew-case-evidence-photos/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was totally him.
I thought he was suing for $15M for everything police put him through just to then drop the charges right before his trial. I dunno, I wouldn't being suing anyone for even a dime if I was guilty of the crime they're accusing me of. I would keep my head down.
Anonymous wrote:It was totally him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this latest news. They dropped the caae against him ... because they wanted to find the body before the trial but there's not enough time?
Is this some kind of strategy?
Maybe they can’t delay the trial but don’t want to argue the case without a full investigation of evidence and a proper autopsy? If they go to trial and lose because of a lack of evidence they can’t re-try him because of double jeopardy. The body isn’t going anywhere , they can refile in 2023.
I wonder why they think they’d ever find the body. And if they do would the remains really be informative of the cause of death?
They found it. Apparently it’s under five feet of snow and ice in a rural mountainous area of Colorado that’s hard to get to?
They found her in sand dunes. In SAND. DUNES. In a Colorado state park. Never would have guessed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this latest news. They dropped the caae against him ... because they wanted to find the body before the trial but there's not enough time?
Is this some kind of strategy?
Maybe they can’t delay the trial but don’t want to argue the case without a full investigation of evidence and a proper autopsy? If they go to trial and lose because of a lack of evidence they can’t re-try him because of double jeopardy. The body isn’t going anywhere , they can refile in 2023.
I wonder why they think they’d ever find the body. And if they do would the remains really be informative of the cause of death?
They found it. Apparently it’s under five feet of snow and ice in a rural mountainous area of Colorado that’s hard to get to?
They found her in sand dunes. In SAND. DUNES. In a Colorado state park. Never would have guessed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand this latest news. They dropped the caae against him ... because they wanted to find the body before the trial but there's not enough time?
Is this some kind of strategy?
Maybe they can’t delay the trial but don’t want to argue the case without a full investigation of evidence and a proper autopsy? If they go to trial and lose because of a lack of evidence they can’t re-try him because of double jeopardy. The body isn’t going anywhere , they can refile in 2023.
I wonder why they think they’d ever find the body. And if they do would the remains really be informative of the cause of death?
They found it. Apparently it’s under five feet of snow and ice in a rural mountainous area of Colorado that’s hard to get to?