Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of gym for elementary age isn't a big deal, nor is the lack of a cafeteria. Those things have very little impact on the educational experience for elementary school kids. Is it really so bad for young kids to play outside as much as possible, or to eat lunch at their desks?
With all due respect, this is Maryland we are talking about. There are several weeks during the year children are unable to play outside because it is too cold. They need a gym.
A cafeteria is also nice because a lot of families prefer lunch being provided by the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of gym for elementary age isn't a big deal, nor is the lack of a cafeteria. Those things have very little impact on the educational experience for elementary school kids. Is it really so bad for young kids to play outside as much as possible, or to eat lunch at their desks?
With all due respect, this is Maryland we are talking about. There are several weeks during the year children are unable to play outside because it is too cold. They need a gym.
A cafeteria is also nice because a lot of families prefer lunch being provided by the school.
When my kids were at Grace Episcopal Day School in Kensington a few years ago, they didn't serve lunch except for pizza on Friday. Nobody cared and it's widely regarded as a great elementary school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of gym for elementary age isn't a big deal, nor is the lack of a cafeteria. Those things have very little impact on the educational experience for elementary school kids. Is it really so bad for young kids to play outside as much as possible, or to eat lunch at their desks?
With all due respect, this is Maryland we are talking about. There are several weeks during the year children are unable to play outside because it is too cold. They need a gym.
A cafeteria is also nice because a lot of families prefer lunch being provided by the school.
Anonymous wrote:You guys pay $20K for a school that has no gym or cafeteria, and that is financially in trouble?
Wow.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lack of gym for elementary age isn't a big deal, nor is the lack of a cafeteria. Those things have very little impact on the educational experience for elementary school kids. Is it really so bad for young kids to play outside as much as possible, or to eat lunch at their desks?
With all due respect, this is Maryland we are talking about. There are several weeks during the year children are unable to play outside because it is too cold. They need a gym.
A cafeteria is also nice because a lot of families prefer lunch being provided by the school.

Anonymous wrote:The lack of gym for elementary age isn't a big deal, nor is the lack of a cafeteria. Those things have very little impact on the educational experience for elementary school kids. Is it really so bad for young kids to play outside as much as possible, or to eat lunch at their desks?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You guys are paying money to a school nobody has heard of, and that has no athletic faciliaties?
I always assumed one reason they were able to keep costs so low (compared to other secular private schools) is because they offer no bells and whistles. I mentioned much earlier in this thread that I toured many, many years ago when my daughter was entering K. The small size and lack of bells and whistles did not interest me. But on the other hand, does one want to pay almost $50k for the most up-to-date bells and whistles? People complain about that.
What is the good balance between a school that does well regarding academics, no bells and whistles and inexpensive vs one one that is much, much more expensive, does well regarding academics and all the bells and whistles?
Anonymous wrote:You guys are paying money to a school nobody has heard of, and that has no athletic faciliaties?
Anonymous wrote:You guys are paying money to a school nobody has heard of, and that has no athletic faciliaties?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This Seneca school has no gym? Makes sense now.
They exercise outside. Probably what everyone should be doing for the next year or so...
Anonymous wrote:This Seneca school has no gym? Makes sense now.