Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid has received a dorm infraction for alcohol, noise violation, drugs, found passed out in a hallway. Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid hasn't shown up for class in 2 or 3 weeks.
FERPA
At 18, all of the privacy rights provided by FERPA belong to the student.
https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/faq/what-ferpa
There is no law preventing colleges from emailing parents a notification the child has been absent from class or had a run-in with campus police.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid has received a dorm infraction for alcohol, noise violation, drugs, found passed out in a hallway. Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid hasn't shown up for class in 2 or 3 weeks.
FERPA
At 18, all of the privacy rights provided by FERPA belong to the student.
https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/faq/what-ferpa
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education used to operate legally “in loco parents,” and laws changed starting in the ‘60s such that they now do not. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis
The law of the land changed in the 1960s. Current laws have been in place for approximately 70 years.
When Mom went to college in the 1950s boys were locked out of the dorm and the dorm had a "house mother" who
protected the girls "innocence." Girls were not allowed in the boys dorms either.
Both Mom and Dad also had maids that cleaned their dorm rooms as part of their dorm fees. I'm not sure if the
maids were daily or weekly. Mom and Dad were at a state college (not private).
Alcohol has been problematic in college settings for 100's of years. Gambling used to be a problem in the 1800s.
Back in the day, the girl's had curfews and had to be back to the dorm by a certain hour or they would get into trouble. Men were not allowed in the building. At my mom's school attendance at the meals in the dining hall were mandatory and served family style. No skipping dinner and heading out for pizza w/o getting permission. If they were planning to go home for the weekend or take an overnight trip they had to inform the house mother of their plans in advance.
Times were better then. Now Ivory Tower lunatic hippies get off on kids going nuts. If a few die, develop addictions, get sexually assaulted, so be it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid has received a dorm infraction for alcohol, noise violation, drugs, found passed out in a hallway. Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid hasn't shown up for class in 2 or 3 weeks.
FERPA
At 18, all of the privacy rights provided by FERPA belong to the student.
https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/faq/what-ferpa
How to fix this nonsense??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid has received a dorm infraction for alcohol, noise violation, drugs, found passed out in a hallway. Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid hasn't shown up for class in 2 or 3 weeks.
FERPA
At 18, all of the privacy rights provided by FERPA belong to the student.
https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/faq/what-ferpa
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid has received a dorm infraction for alcohol, noise violation, drugs, found passed out in a hallway. Cite the "law" about emailing parents a notification your kid hasn't shown up for class in 2 or 3 weeks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education used to operate legally “in loco parents,” and laws changed starting in the ‘60s such that they now do not. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis
The law of the land changed in the 1960s. Current laws have been in place for approximately 70 years.
When Mom went to college in the 1950s boys were locked out of the dorm and the dorm had a "house mother" who
protected the girls "innocence." Girls were not allowed in the boys dorms either.
Both Mom and Dad also had maids that cleaned their dorm rooms as part of their dorm fees. I'm not sure if the
maids were daily or weekly. Mom and Dad were at a state college (not private).
Alcohol has been problematic in college settings for 100's of years. Gambling used to be a problem in the 1800s.
Back in the day, the girl's had curfews and had to be back to the dorm by a certain hour or they would get into trouble. Men were not allowed in the building. At my mom's school attendance at the meals in the dining hall were mandatory and served family style. No skipping dinner and heading out for pizza w/o getting permission. If they were planning to go home for the weekend or take an overnight trip they had to inform the house mother of their plans in advance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.
Once again, for the terminally stupid . . .
That.Does.Not.Comply.With.The.Law. Unless the freshman is 17, which few are, and virtually none for the entire year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Higher education used to operate legally “in loco parents,” and laws changed starting in the ‘60s such that they now do not. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis
The law of the land changed in the 1960s. Current laws have been in place for approximately 70 years.
When Mom went to college in the 1950s boys were locked out of the dorm and the dorm had a "house mother" who
protected the girls "innocence." Girls were not allowed in the boys dorms either.
Both Mom and Dad also had maids that cleaned their dorm rooms as part of their dorm fees. I'm not sure if the
maids were daily or weekly. Mom and Dad were at a state college (not private).
Alcohol has been problematic in college settings for 100's of years. Gambling used to be a problem in the 1800s.
Anonymous wrote:Higher education used to operate legally “in loco parents,” and laws changed starting in the ‘60s such that they now do not. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_loco_parentis
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
For all that cash, parents must DEMAND better.
But you know you have to take your demands to your elected officials because your issue is with the law. Or do you think colleges should just ignore laws?
While you’re at it, why not make the age of majority 25?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think it's a lot to ask that the default be open disclosure to parents of freshman. It should have to be turned off by the student upon request. OF COURSE the colleges are wholly against this sort of disclosure because they want to control your kids and brush everything under the rug.
That's called nudging. Just like with organ donors, much more opt-in when it's just default.