Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

You don't know the meaning of gaslighting. But, it's trendy to say.... so.....

I agree with pp. Lots of strong women out there. Not all of them are Democrats, by the way.

As long as they're lily-white you approve, I'm sure.

There you go again. Always pulling that race card. It's old and tired.

You seem to like it plenty when Trump does it.

Hey, honey bunch - you're the one that injected race into the discussion. Neither I nor Trump did that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

You don't know the meaning of gaslighting. But, it's trendy to say.... so.....

I agree with pp. Lots of strong women out there. Not all of them are Democrats, by the way.

As long as they're lily-white you approve, I'm sure.

There you go again. Always pulling that race card. It's old and tired.

You seem to like it plenty when Trump does it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

You can't support Trump AND say you don't approve of those chants. It's just not believeable, sorry.

DP.
Of course you can. You may not believe it, but I do.
Of course, you probably believe things I don't. Like Michael Cohen went to Prague. Or, that the Steele dossier was accurate.

Contrary to your belief, he did not lead the chant, and he has disavowed them. But, you don't believe that either.

LOL! Never try to talk sense to Cult45.

Never try to debate with one who consistently uses the term "Cult45" because she resorts to name calling in an effort to cover up for her lack of debate skills and logical arguments.

Why bother when you lie so much? Every one of your statements is easily debunked, often by your own Dear Leader.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

You don't know the meaning of gaslighting. But, it's trendy to say.... so.....

I agree with pp. Lots of strong women out there. Not all of them are Democrats, by the way.

As long as they're lily-white you approve, I'm sure.

There you go again. Always pulling that race card. It's old and tired.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

You can't support Trump AND say you don't approve of those chants. It's just not believeable, sorry.

DP.
Of course you can. You may not believe it, but I do.
Of course, you probably believe things I don't. Like Michael Cohen went to Prague. Or, that the Steele dossier was accurate.

Contrary to your belief, he did not lead the chant, and he has disavowed them. But, you don't believe that either.

LOL! Never try to talk sense to Cult45.

Never try to debate with one who consistently uses the term "Cult45" because she resorts to name calling in an effort to cover up for her lack of debate skills and logical arguments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

You don't know the meaning of gaslighting. But, it's trendy to say.... so.....

I agree with pp. Lots of strong women out there. Not all of them are Democrats, by the way.

As long as they're lily-white you approve, I'm sure.

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts from a center-right voter who would like to vote for a Democrat but will probably just end up writing someone in again:

1. Harris isn’t as moderate as this thread suggests. She literally proposed abolishing private insurance. I was skeptical of but largely okay with Obamacare. This next move scares me.

2. Mayor Pete is a joke. If Republicans nominated a staunch conservative mayor of, say, Huntsville, the commentariat would fairly be asking if this is a further sign of a party crack-up. He shouldn’t be in this convo.

3. I like Warren personally, but she’s way too liberal. If I were a Dem, though, I’d want to see her nominated. Clearly smart and probably very capable.

4. Biden wouldn’t be anywhere near this conversation if not for folks’ rosy views of Obama.

5. The debates seemed like raw meat for the base. It was really unsettling to me.

6. Trump will lose virtually regardless. 2016 was a fluke and no one wants to be caught off guard by his victory again. But flukes are sometimes flukes, and that’s what 2016 was.

7. Please don’t screw this up and, in particular, please don’t pick Bernie.

Agree on all this plus any time a candidate specifically makes a policy geared toward a racial group it just makes Trump stronger

The candidates need to quit specifically making comments and policies that benefit african americans or illegal immigrants etc

Just stick to what warren is doing most of the D proposals would benefit large portions of poor and middle class Americans stick to it helping Americans period not some specific group

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

You can't support Trump AND say you don't approve of those chants. It's just not believeable, sorry.

DP.
Of course you can. You may not believe it, but I do.
Of course, you probably believe things I don't. Like Michael Cohen went to Prague. Or, that the Steele dossier was accurate.

Contrary to your belief, he did not lead the chant, and he has disavowed them. But, you don't believe that either.

LOL! Never try to talk sense to Cult45.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

You can't support Trump AND say you don't approve of those chants. It's just not believeable, sorry.

DP.
Of course you can. You may not believe it, but I do.
Of course, you probably believe things I don't. Like Michael Cohen went to Prague. Or, that the Steele dossier was accurate.

Contrary to your belief, he did not lead the chant, and he has disavowed them. But, you don't believe that either.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

You don't know the meaning of gaslighting. But, it's trendy to say.... so.....

I agree with pp. Lots of strong women out there. Not all of them are Democrats, by the way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

You can't support Trump AND say you don't approve of those chants. It's just not believeable, sorry.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

PP here. I don't approve of those chants at all. I'm just making a general comment about strong women.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.

Nice try at gaslighting. Yeah, person who admires women is the type to chant send her back. Insecure wimps.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Should anyone be elected that is promising "healthcare for all"..... it will be a promise not kept. Mark my words.

It's not sustainable.

The good docs will open boutique shops. Pay up front!

Why can't it be sustainable? If you open up medicare, the pool gets bigger. Most people won't get it for free. You pay on a sliding scale, as they do today. My parents are low income, but they still pay for medicare.

Medicare taxes on paychecks can also be raised a tiny bit to help sustain it. It's what Reagan did back in 1983. Yes, folks, a R raised taxes to help pay for government sponsored healthcare. Imagine that.

Medicare pays a fraction of what the charges really are. Private insurance currently pays a much greater percentage.
A few things will happen with Medicare for all.
1. People are going to stop going into medicine. It won't be worth it considering the cost of the education.
2. Doctors will stop or avoid taking Medicare. Right now, about 94% of doctors take Medicare patients - that willl likely become less. This assumes that people will still have private insurance, which is debatable under the Medicare for All plans.
3. Doctors will become "boutique." My former GP had such a practice. You paid an annual fee ($1500 or more) for the luxury of being his patient. He limited the number of patients he took and none were Medicare. He was an excellent doctor, so my family paid. Each adult is charged the annual fee. Kids were covered under that plan.
4. People will start paying in cash and probably get reduced charges for services.

Are fewer people going to go into medicine? If that is the case, why are there doctors still going into practice around the world in places where there is Medicare for all?

They may stop taking Medicare and go to boutique, but if there is a large enough section of the population on Medicare, they will take it. Not every doc can become boutique.

What it comes down to is the cost of medicine, not the insurance. Costs are out of control, so you are almost forced to have insurance because you cannot pay for it. If costs came down, it would be easier to pay for care and use insurance only as catastrophic. Like car insurance, I can pay for routine care, minor repairs out of pocket, but I carry insurance for major issues.
My daughter had her bellybutton cauterized when she was a couple weeks old. The doc saw it was oozing a little and immediately did it. I got a bill in the mail for $175 for it. Why the hell was it that expensive???

Other countries pay a fraction of the costs that we do because companies know they can make up their costs in the US. We need somebody to oversee healthcare costs and get them down to be more manageable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:+1. To the above. The Dems are running like the winner is going to be chosen by popular vote. It’s baffling to me.

The Republicans are running like you're going to anoint the winner at a KKK rally. It's baffling to me.

It shouldn’t be. There are a lot of (1) racists and (2) people who are extremely opposed to illegal immigration and (3) people who will accept anything from Trump as long as he’s for tax cutting and nominates conservative judges. And these people aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive, so it’s not a bad strategy (obviously, as Trump won the presidency).

But the Democrats’ strategy truly is baffling. Most of them are advocating for positions far to the left of where most of the country, and the Obama administration is/was. When the states they have to win are (as always) swing states that are not bastions of coastal liberalism. Issues like racial justice, healthcare and other protections for undocumented immigrants, taking away private health insurance, etc. are not going to be winners there. They just aren’t. The 2020 candidates need to recognize this and change their messaging accordingly, but most of them aren’t grasping this. It’s truly baffling.

I think it's super baffling that Republicans think they can be as utterly repellent as they are being, right out in the open, and it won't have consequences!

Your default seems to be that Republicans win unless perfect Democrats come to challenge them. I do not subscribe to that default. I think Republicans are repellent and going out of their way to repel moderates, white suburban women, black voters, and anyone else beyond the Trumpiest of Trumpzis.

Do I feel confident that Trump will lose? F*ck no! 2016 blindsided me and I feel like I've still got PTSD. Do I feel more confident every time I see Trump being a disgraceful fool, and his Republican buddies falling in line? Yes, I sure do.

Poor little snowflake-

LOL! The snowflakes are the MAGA trash yelling "send her back" because they can't abide strong Democratic women.

You're confused. Just because someone doesn't agree with another woman's ideas doesn't mean that person doesn't like and admire strong women.