Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if this same toddler is in a store and pulls down a display shelf of expensive items.... oopsie?
We are raising a generation of dipshits because we've abandoned all sense of accountability. And I'm not talking about the children... it's the parents more interested in their selfie with their pinot gris and the ahi tuna than the child across the table with a tablet pressed to their nose.
This is a good point, without the name calling and over dramatic scenario. If a 2 year old pushes a lamp or vase down in Target or tosses a ball in a store and breaks something, parent should be responsible.
Something being out and accessible doesn't give a child the right to touch it. The child may not know better, but that's how it goes. Parent has to take the heat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if this same toddler is in a store and pulls down a display shelf of expensive items.... oopsie?
We are raising a generation of dipshits because we've abandoned all sense of accountability. And I'm not talking about the children... it's the parents more interested in their selfie with their pinot gris and the ahi tuna than the child across the table with a tablet pressed to their nose.
This is a good point, without the name calling and over dramatic scenario. If a 2 year old pushes a lamp or vase down in Target or tosses a ball in a store and breaks something, parent should be responsible.
Something being out and accessible doesn't give a child the right to touch it. The child may not know better, but that's how it goes. Parent has to take the heat.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand all of you people who are saying the parent of the toddler is responsible to pay, but the owner of the phone should refuse to accept payment.
Aren't you admitting that it's the owner's fault? If someone does something to destroy my property and I legitimately believe it's their fault, I will accept their payment. If someone hits my car - I expect to be paid for that. I wouldn't graciously decline the offer.
I think you are tacitly admitting that it IS the phone owner's fault but you would offer to pay even though you aren't at fault, because you feel badly that the phone owner is in that situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of the boy who threw it.
No. The stupid mother who put her phone down at kiddie pool.
How about the parent not watching poolside a kid not old enough to know better?
Oh didn’t you hear? You don’t have to watch your kids at the kiddie pool. Drowning is nonexistent.
You should work on your reading comprehension. You are truly the only one saying that.
Really?! My mistake.
Guess I’m just confused when plenty of responses have said, it’s just the kiddie pool and they don’t need that much supervision. When drowning was brought up someone called that poster crazy. When asked why the child who threw the phone into the pool wasn’t being watched the responses were it’s a kiddie pool you don’t have to hover. Other responses were the kiddie pool is where children can run free.
Anonymous wrote:So if this same toddler is in a store and pulls down a display shelf of expensive items.... oopsie?
We are raising a generation of dipshits because we've abandoned all sense of accountability. And I'm not talking about the children... it's the parents more interested in their selfie with their pinot gris and the ahi tuna than the child across the table with a tablet pressed to their nose.
Anonymous wrote:So if this same toddler is in a store and pulls down a display shelf of expensive items.... oopsie?
We are raising a generation of dipshits because we've abandoned all sense of accountability. And I'm not talking about the children... it's the parents more interested in their selfie with their pinot gris and the ahi tuna than the child across the table with a tablet pressed to their nose.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of the boy who threw it.
No. The stupid mother who put her phone down at kiddie pool.
How about the parent not watching poolside a kid not old enough to know better?
Oh didn’t you hear? You don’t have to watch your kids at the kiddie pool. Drowning is nonexistent.
You should work on your reading comprehension. You are truly the only one saying that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of the boy who threw it.
No. The stupid mother who put her phone down at kiddie pool.
How about the parent not watching poolside a kid not old enough to know better?
Oh didn’t you hear? You don’t have to watch your kids at the kiddie pool. Drowning is nonexistent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of the boy who threw it.
No. The stupid mother who put her phone down at kiddie pool.
How about the parent not watching poolside a kid not old enough to know better?