Anonymous wrote:The New York and DC Attorney General, both of whom are Democrats, have flat out admitted that they are attempting to destroy the NRA. And you think it is about enforcing the law?
If you don't get it, you don't get it.
Racine's announcement came the same day New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) announced a lawsuit seeking to dissolve the NRA itself. James alleged that the pro-gun interest group violated state law that governs nonprofit organizations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
There are an awful lot of right wingers who think this crime should be ignored for some reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
There are an awful lot of right wingers who think this crime should be ignored for some reason.
New to politics?
Anonymous wrote:The New York and DC Attorney General, both of whom are Democrats, have flat out admitted that they are attempting to destroy the NRA. And you think it is about enforcing the law?
If you don't get it, you don't get it.
Racine's announcement came the same day New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) announced a lawsuit seeking to dissolve the NRA itself. James alleged that the pro-gun interest group violated state law that governs nonprofit organizations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
Of course not. It's a great way to score points with left wing voters. Do you really think she cares about NRA members? Everyone knows it's a political stunt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
There are an awful lot of right wingers who think this crime should be ignored for some reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
NRA is incorporated in NY, so NY has the jurisdiction.
Of course they are politicians. That doesn't mean every decision they make is political. She had clear reason to investigate this from NRA insiders. Again, should she have ignored this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
But why NY?
She is a former defense attorney and one of the new woke prosecutors. She is pandering to her clueless left wing constituents by going after the NRA.
In June 2016, James attempted to pressure six financial institutions, including BB&T, Berkshire Bank, Citizens Financial Group, People's United Bank, Regions Financial Corporation and TD Bank, into ending its practice of providing financial services to gun manufacturers.
Did you not know that these people are politicians?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.
Oliver North was president of the NRA until 2019. He believed there were financial issues and ordered an investigation. The investigation never happened, he was forced out instead. This was widely reported in the news and NY AG launched it's own investigation at the same time. You think they should have ignored this? Why?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would the NY AG care that Wayne LaPierre was irresponsibly spending money from donors?
If this is about politics, isn't it better that he wastes the money instead of use it for lobbying purposes.
Are you seriously asking why the AGs office would care about laws being broken?
Are you seriously not getting that the AG is politically motivated?
So using your logic, no prosecutors can fairly handle cases relating to people of opposite political parties? That makes a ton of sense...
Might want to re-take logic class.