Anonymous wrote:Since I know many of you live and breathe the almighty US News rankings, you all should look at undergrad teaching rankings. Michigan is ranked #13 in the nation for undergraduate teaching. Cornell? #61. Oof.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The odd thing here is that the schools and their atmospheres are very different. It really should be based on where the kid feels most comfortable and where the academic opportunities provide a decent possible fit (provided the kid is not looking for some very specific program or has scholarship possibilities, etc. . . that would lead to a different analysis).
Kids rejected from Cornell handle Ann Arbor and Charlottesville just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fake thread. This isn't a real decision. Nobody with a brain chooses public u over an Ivy.
Except the donut hole families that’s not prepared to pay $70,000+ per year for 4 years.
This is a baseless myth spread by tailgate state dimwits on message boards. The avg Cornell debt load is less than Michigan's according to US Gov Scorecard. And Cornell grads make a lot more money! You sorry dimwits need to just stop.
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/school/?170976-University-of-Michigan-Ann-Arbor
https://collegescorecard.ed.gov/school/?190415-Cornell-University
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The odd thing here is that the schools and their atmospheres are very different. It really should be based on where the kid feels most comfortable and where the academic opportunities provide a decent possible fit (provided the kid is not looking for some very specific program or has scholarship possibilities, etc. . . that would lead to a different analysis).
Kids rejected from Cornell handle Ann Arbor and Charlottesville just fine.
Anonymous wrote:The odd thing here is that the schools and their atmospheres are very different. It really should be based on where the kid feels most comfortable and where the academic opportunities provide a decent possible fit (provided the kid is not looking for some very specific program or has scholarship possibilities, etc. . . that would lead to a different analysis).
Kids rejected from Cornell handle Ann Arbor and Charlottesville just fine.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fake thread. This isn't a real decision. Nobody with a brain chooses public u over an Ivy.
Except the donut hole families that’s not prepared to pay $70,000+ per year for 4 years.
Anonymous wrote:Fake thread. This isn't a real decision. Nobody with a brain chooses public u over an Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fake thread. This isn't a real decision. Nobody with a brain chooses public u over an Ivy.
Especially if you are from the East Coast (mid-Atlantic). The price tag isn't that different between the two. And the driving time is less for Cornell. Its an Ivy and attracts more geographic diversity and better prepared cohorts.
Anonymous wrote:Fake thread. This isn't a real decision. Nobody with a brain chooses public u over an Ivy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have to question the capacity of anyone who genuinely turns down a more competitive, more elite, resource-rich college for the 40,000-student rah-rah diploma mill full of slackers who paint their faces for sport ball matches. Such a decision would be a MAJOR personality red flag at the very least.
Cornell is great. Michigan is great. No red flags if someone gets into both and has the choice and chooses one over the other.
+1. All this hue and cry over two schools that are ranked 17 and 25 respectively.
25 could be Cornell - easily. It’s Soft Ivy that overlaps with Almost Ivies.
If someone thinks it is the right fit for them, and they are part of the single digits to be admitted, who are you to rain on that parade?
OP’s kid chose M over Cornell. Who are you to say she’s wrong about her choice?
Your reading comprehension skills are atrocious.