Anonymous wrote:I had my kids at 31 and 33, which according to current standards is about the perfect age. However, my own parent had me at 23 and 24 and it's weird to me to think that when my parents were my age (46), I was already out of college, whereas my own kids are 12 and 14. I'm a bit torn because I certainly enjoyed my childfree time in my 20's, but hate to think that my kids and future grandkids will be younger when I'm gone. I didn't lose my first grandparent, till I was in my 40s. I understand the benefits of delaying kids, but sometimes, I think society is doing a disservice to us by encouraging this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Okay, but those eggs are not your best work. Just saying. You may have had a viable birth, but you would have better kids if you had had them earlier. Mic drop. But I’m sure the ones you have are just adorable!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]I hope you support paid family leave and universal affordable childcare, and candidates that push for those policies.[/b]
I do, but in the past, everyone started having kids in their early 20's and none of these things existed.
Wow. You are so clueless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]I hope you support paid family leave and universal affordable childcare, and candidates that push for those policies.[/b]
I do, but in the past, everyone started having kids in their early 20's and none of these things existed.
A living wage existed. Guys could get a blue collar job straight out of high school and make enough to buy a house and support a family on one income. Today that’s not possible for most college graduates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Okay, but those eggs are not your best work. Just saying. You may have had a viable birth, but you would have better kids if you had had them earlier. Mic drop. But I’m sure the ones you have are just adorable!
Wow, aren’t you a world class b!tch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]I hope you support paid family leave and universal affordable childcare, and candidates that push for those policies.[/b]
I do, but in the past, everyone started having kids in their early 20's and none of these things existed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Okay, but those eggs are not your best work. Just saying. You may have had a viable birth, but you would have better kids if you had had them earlier. Mic drop. But I’m sure the ones you have are just adorable!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous[b wrote:]I hope you support paid family leave and universal affordable childcare, and candidates that push for those policies.[/b]
I do, but in the past, everyone started having kids in their early 20's and none of these things existed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Okay, but those eggs are not your best work. Just saying. You may have had a viable birth, but you would have better kids if you had had them earlier. Mic drop. But I’m sure the ones you have are just adorable!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
+1 and I am one of them. Pregnant with no help at 35 and 38.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one of the huge mistakes of today’s society and I silently shake my head in sad confusion whenever I see a pregnant person in their 40s or late 30s. It’s not right. Our bodies know it’s not right, but science makes it possible.
Well, I know a number of women that got pregnant late 30's/ early 40's without help.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^^^ Did it occur to you that you did not attract men who wanted to settle down because you were not interested in settling down?
I dated two men seriously, one I am married to. I was open with every guy I ever went out with that I wanted to have kids and was dating with that in mind. I met my future husband at 22. Started dating at 24, married at 27. And +4 for him (so he was 31).
I consider myself a case study in focused dating. And I consider myself lucky, because I'm the only one of my friends married, two kids in and financially and relationship stable at 33. Some have some of those things, but I have all. Mostly it was luck and I still didn't have my first until 31.
Wow you sound smug. But I find that life works in cycles so I’m sure before too long you’ll find yourself taken down a peg or two.
But please don’t wish that on anyone. Everyone does in fact experience grave misfortune but we don’t wish that on others!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My parents had us in their mid20s. They were newlyweds with starter jobs and no savings. Sure, it worked out fine but I have no doubt my kids are better off having parents that have careers, savings, stability.
I am in the camp that thinks getting married in your early 20s is usually a bad idea and evidence is starting to prove out those who get married later divorce less. Which is better for kids? I would argue for 'older' parents.
Well, actually no, the "evidence" does not really prove that. Prior to age 32 or so, each additional year of age at marriage reduces the odds of divorce by 11 percent. However, after that the odds of divorce increase by 5 percent per year. The change in slopes is statistically significant. In other words, getting married after your mid-30s is actually riskier than getting married in your late 20s—and that the best age at which to get married appears to be between 28 and 32. Before that age range, divorce rates are still decreasing; after that window, they begin to climb again.
Anonymous wrote:My parents had us in their mid20s. They were newlyweds with starter jobs and no savings. Sure, it worked out fine but I have no doubt my kids are better off having parents that have careers, savings, stability.
I am in the camp that thinks getting married in your early 20s is usually a bad idea and evidence is starting to prove out those who get married later divorce less. Which is better for kids? I would argue for 'older' parents.