Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
This is so obviously true; I don't see how it can even be considered "controversial."
Seriously, is there some controversy over this view?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kids from low income low education level families would be better off in separate schools, where they would have their needs met (lots of basic enrichment, year round schooling, enough time for learning the basics in reading and math, free meals, outside time, character building).
Kids from UMC and MC home would be better off in more experiential schools with less time for direct instruction and more time for more advanced (possibly few based) enrichment and less strict attendance policies.
Isn’t this why UMC send their kids to private?[/quote]
Most UMC families send their kids to public schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AI is going to make much of the STEM field obsolete. Sorry guys.
Who is going to create and manage all of the apps and tools to make AI possible, genius??!! Your STEM counterparts.
lol AI is going to be making AI it's already started
My computer can code better than I can
I don't believe you. And I'm in the tech field
Same. I'm actually in the automation of programming field and it's a lot like fusion reactors. Just around the corner, fifteen years from now. IOW, nowhere near viability.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
+1
X a million
But I’m gonna up the anti...
If we removed children from their shitty homes and boarded them, we’d see a dramatic drop in crime within 20 years.
Boarding school? It's Lord of the Flies there. There's a reason we closed the orphanages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Direct instruction is better than experiential learning, since it's better taught.
+1000
- a teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public schools are failing dyslexic kids. If you are the parent of a dyslexic kid take your child out for remediation, because it's not going to be done well in public school. And no accommodations alone just don't cut it. Neither does waiting for the kid to fail just to prove they really do have just want the private testing has already told you they have: dyslexia.
Did you start the reading thread? Sounds like it.
No, that wasn't me, I have to admit. But this is a very common opinion of parents of kids with dyslexia, so I am not surprise another parent beat me to the punch.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
This is so obviously true; I don't see how it can even be considered "controversial."
Seriously, is there some controversy over this view?
Apparently so. Do you see any schools for parents on how to raise their children?
DP -- I would fully support tax dollars going to adding parenting classes to the wrap around services at schools in high poverty areas. If I had my way, parents who get any form of social services and who don't have jobs would be required to be occupied with remedial coursework, job training, parenting classes, cooking and nutrition classes, personal finance classes, and the like. We have to break the cycle of poverty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AI is going to make much of the STEM field obsolete. Sorry guys.
Who is going to create and manage all of the apps and tools to make AI possible, genius??!! Your STEM counterparts.
lol AI is going to be making AI it's already started
My computer can code better than I can
I don't believe you. And I'm in the tech field
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
This is so obviously true; I don't see how it can even be considered "controversial."
Seriously, is there some controversy over this view?
Apparently so. Do you see any schools for parents on how to raise their children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Public schools are failing dyslexic kids. If you are the parent of a dyslexic kid take your child out for remediation, because it's not going to be done well in public school. And no accommodations alone just don't cut it. Neither does waiting for the kid to fail just to prove they really do have just want the private testing has already told you they have: dyslexia.
Did you start the reading thread? Sounds like it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
This is so obviously true; I don't see how it can even be considered "controversial."
Seriously, is there some controversy over this view?
Anonymous wrote:Achievement gaps will only ever be eliminated by changes in homes and society in general. Attempting to correct them in the schools is too little, too late.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't believe in the Hillary Clinton "It takes a village" philosophy. I signed up to raise my kids, not yours. It's not my job to make up for other people's bad parenting choices.
You end up paying more for it later because these kids become criminals, dropouts, underemployed, more likely to use gov benefits later on
Better to fix the issue when they are younger
Signed Republican
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AI is going to make much of the STEM field obsolete. Sorry guys.
Who is going to create and manage all of the apps and tools to make AI possible, genius??!! Your STEM counterparts.
lol AI is going to be making AI it's already started
My computer can code better than I can
Anonymous wrote:I don't believe in the Hillary Clinton "It takes a village" philosophy. I signed up to raise my kids, not yours. It's not my job to make up for other people's bad parenting choices.